$2x + 3y = 7$
$x - y = 1$
$a_1x + b_1y + c_1z = d_1$
$a_2x + b_2y + c_2z = d_2$
$a_3x + b_3y + c_3z = d_3$
$a_1x + b_1y + c_1z = d_1$
$a_2x + b_2y + c_2z = d_2$
Key Insight for Case 1: When $det(A)
eq 0$, the lines (or planes) *definitely* intersect at one distinct point. This is the simplest and most straightforward case!
| Condition on $det(A)$ | Condition on $adj(A) cdot B$ | Conclusion about System Consistency | Type of Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| $det(A) eq 0$ | (Not required to check) | Consistent | Unique Solution |
| $det(A) = 0$ | $adj(A) cdot B eq 0$ | Inconsistent | No Solution |
| $det(A) = 0$ | $adj(A) cdot B = 0$ | Consistent | Infinitely Many Solutions |
Alright class, let's dive deep into one of the most crucial applications of matrices and determinants: determining the consistency of a system of linear equations. This concept is fundamental, not just for solving equations, but for understanding the very nature of solutions, which is a frequently tested area in JEE.
First, let's refresh our memory about what a system of linear equations is. It's a collection of one or more linear equations involving the same set of variables. For example:
aβx + bβy + cβz = dβ
aβx + bβy + cβz = dβ
aβx + bβy + cβz = dβ
Here, x, y, z are the variables, and aα΅’, bα΅’, cα΅’, dα΅’ are constants. We can represent such a system in a compact matrix form: AX = B.
For the example above:
When we talk about the "consistency" of a system of linear equations, we are simply asking: Does a solution exist?
Our goal is to use matrix methods to determine which of these scenarios holds for a given system without necessarily solving it completely.
This method is particularly useful and quick when the number of equations equals the number of variables, meaning the coefficient matrix A is a square matrix (e.g., 2x2, 3x3). Let's consider the system AX = B.
This is the most common scenario where the right-hand side constants are not all zero.
If the determinant of the coefficient matrix is non-zero, it implies that the matrix A is invertible (Aβ»ΒΉ exists). In this situation, we can directly find a unique solution:
AX = B
Aβ»ΒΉ(AX) = Aβ»ΒΉB
IX = Aβ»ΒΉB
X = Aβ»ΒΉB
This gives us a unique solution. Therefore, the system is consistent.
JEE Focus: This is the simplest case, often tested for basic understanding. Recall Cramer's Rule is also applicable here and yields the same unique solution.
This is where things get interesting and require further investigation. If det(A) = 0, matrix A is singular, meaning Aβ»ΒΉ does not exist. We can't use the direct inverse method. Instead, we need to examine the product adj(A) * B.
Recall that Aβ»ΒΉ = (1/det(A)) * adj(A). When det(A) = 0, the expression for Aβ»ΒΉ becomes undefined. However, we know that A * adj(A) = det(A) * I.
Multiplying AX = B by adj(A) from the left:
adj(A) * (AX) = adj(A) * B
(adj(A) * A) * X = adj(A) * B
(det(A) * I) * X = adj(A) * B
Since det(A) = 0, we get:
0 * X = adj(A) * B
If adj(A) * B β 0 (a non-zero matrix/vector):
The equation becomes , which is a contradiction. This means there is no solution. The system is inconsistent.
If adj(A) * B = 0 (a zero matrix/vector):
The equation becomes , which is an identity. This means the equations are dependent or have overlapping solutions. In this scenario, the system has infinitely many solutions. Therefore, the system is consistent.
JEE Focus: This is a common trap! A zero determinant *doesn't automatically mean no solution*. It could mean infinitely many solutions. Always perform the adj(A) * B check when det(A) = 0.
A homogeneous system always has at least one solution, which is the trivial solution (x=0, y=0, z=0...). So, homogeneous systems are always consistent.
However, we often want to know if non-trivial solutions exist:
As before, Aβ»ΒΉ exists. So, X = Aβ»ΒΉB = Aβ»ΒΉ0 = 0. This means the only solution is the trivial solution (unique solution).
In this case, A is singular. The system has infinitely many solutions, which include the trivial solution and other non-trivial solutions. These solutions often represent a line or a plane in higher dimensions.
Let's summarize the determinant method for non-homogeneous systems AX=B (where A is square):
| Condition | Conclusion about Solutions | Consistency |
|---|---|---|
| det(A) β 0 | Unique Solution (X = Aβ»ΒΉB) | Consistent |
| det(A) = 0 AND adj(A) * B β 0 | No Solution | Inconsistent |
| det(A) = 0 AND adj(A) * B = 0 | Infinitely Many Solutions | Consistent |
CBSE vs. JEE Focus: For CBSE, the determinant method is often sufficient and explicitly taught. For JEE, while it's important for square matrices, the rank method provides a more general and powerful approach, especially for non-square systems or for confirming complex cases.
This is a more powerful and general method that works for any system of linear equations (m equations, n variables), regardless of whether the coefficient matrix is square or rectangular. It relies on the concept of the rank of a matrix.
The rank of a matrix is the maximum number of linearly independent row vectors (or column vectors) in the matrix. Practically, you can find the rank by:
Alternatively, the rank is the order of the largest non-zero minor (determinant of a square submatrix) of the matrix.
To use the rank method, we form the augmented matrix, which combines the coefficient matrix A and the constant matrix B into a single matrix. It's denoted as [A|B].
For a system:
aβx + bβy + cβz = dβ
aβx + bβy + cβz = dβ
aβx + bβy + cβz = dβ
The augmented matrix would be:
This theorem provides the conditions for consistency based on the ranks of A and [A|B]. Let 'n' be the number of variables in the system.
If rank(A) β rank([A|B]), then the system is inconsistent (no solution). This happens when the row operations lead to a contradiction, like 0 = 5, in the augmented part.
If rank(A) = rank([A|B]), then the system is consistent. We then look at the value of this common rank:
If rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n (number of variables):
The system has a unique solution.
If rank(A) = rank([A|B]) < n (number of variables):
The system has infinitely many solutions. This implies that some variables can be expressed in terms of others (free variables).
Let's summarize the Rank method:
| Condition | Conclusion about Solutions | Consistency |
|---|---|---|
| rank(A) β rank([A|B]) | No Solution | Inconsistent |
| rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n (no. of variables) | Unique Solution | Consistent |
| rank(A) = rank([A|B]) < n (no. of variables) | Infinitely Many Solutions | Consistent |
JEE Focus: The rank method is incredibly powerful and crucial for JEE Advanced, especially for systems with parameters (like finding for what values of 'k' the system has unique/no/infinite solutions) and for systems where the number of equations is not equal to the number of variables. Mastery of finding rank using row operations is essential.
Test the consistency of the system:
x + y + z = 3
2x + 3y + z = 6
x + 2y + z = 4
The matrix form AX = B is:
Step 1: Calculate det(A)
Since det(A) = 1 β 0, the system has a unique solution. Thus, it is consistent.
Step 1: Form the Augmented Matrix [A|B]
Step 2: Reduce to Echelon Form (Elementary Row Operations)
Step 3: Determine Ranks
Since rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n = 3, the system is consistent and has a unique solution.
Test the consistency of the system:
x + 2y - z = 4
2x + 4y - 2z = 3
-x - 2y + 2z = -1
Step 1: Calculate det(A)
Since det(A) = 0, we need to calculate adj(A) * B.
Step 2: Calculate adj(A)
Cofactor matrix C:
adj(A) = Cα΅ (transpose of cofactor matrix)
Step 3: Calculate adj(A) * B
Since adj(A) * B β 0 (it's not a zero vector), and det(A) = 0, the system has no solution. Thus, it is inconsistent.
Step 1: Form the Augmented Matrix [A|B]
Step 2: Reduce to Echelon Form
Now, swap R2 and R3 to get a cleaner echelon form (optional, but good practice):
Step 3: Determine Ranks
Since rank(A) = 2 β rank([A|B]) = 3, the system is inconsistent and has no solution. Notice the last row implies , which is , a clear contradiction.
Test the consistency of the system:
x + y + z = 1
x + 2y + 3z = 4
2x + 3y + 4z = 5
Step 1: Calculate det(A)
Since det(A) = 0, we calculate adj(A) * B.
Step 2: Calculate adj(A)
Cofactor matrix C:
adj(A) = Cα΅
Step 3: Calculate adj(A) * B
Since adj(A) * B = 0 and det(A) = 0, the system has infinitely many solutions. Thus, it is consistent.
Step 1: Form the Augmented Matrix [A|B]
Step 2: Reduce to Echelon Form
Step 3: Determine Ranks
Since rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = 2, and this is less than n = 3, the system is consistent and has infinitely many solutions. Notice the last row implies , which means the equations are dependent.
Understanding both methods thoroughly gives you flexibility and a deeper insight into the nature of linear systems. Keep practicing with diverse examples to master these techniques!
If $ ext{det}(A)
eq 0$ (No 'Z' in the determinant):
The system has a Unique Solution. It is Consistent.
Think: No 'Z'ero determinant means a direct, unique path to a solution. This is the simplest case.
If $ ext{adj}(A)B
eq O$ (Still only ONE 'Z' from $ ext{det}(A)$):
The system has No Solution. It is Inconsistent.
Think: One 'Z' (from $ ext{det}(A)$) is not enough for infinite solutions, and $ ext{adj}(A)B$ is not zero. So, NO solution exists.
If $ ext{adj}(A)B = O$ (The second 'Z' appears!):
The system has Infinitely Many Solutions. It is Consistent.
Think: Two 'Z's (from $ ext{det}(A)$ AND $ ext{adj}(A)B$) means there are 'I'nfinite possibilities for solutions.
| Condition | Number of Solutions | Consistency |
|---|---|---|
| $ ext{det}(A) eq 0$ | Unique Solution | Consistent |
| $ ext{det}(A) = 0$ and $ ext{adj}(A)B eq O$ | No Solution | Inconsistent |
| $ ext{det}(A) = 0$ and $ ext{adj}(A)B = O$ | Infinitely Many Solutions | Consistent |
Understanding the consistency of a system of linear equations is a fundamental concept in Matrices and Determinants, crucial for both JEE Main and Board exams. These quick tips will help you efficiently determine if a system has a solution, and if so, how many.
Consider a system of linear equations represented in matrix form as AX = B, where:
The test of consistency using matrices primarily involves analyzing the determinant of the coefficient matrix, |A|, and the product of the adjoint of A with B, (adj A)B.
This is the critical case where further checks are required. You must calculate (adj A)B.
Mastering these rules will enable you to quickly assess the nature of solutions for any system of linear equations, which is a frequently tested concept.
Understanding the consistency of a system of linear equations using matrices provides a powerful and systematic way to determine if solutions exist, and if so, how many. At its heart, this test is about understanding the relationship between the coefficient matrix, the constant terms, and the variables.
Intuitively, a system of linear equations is consistent if there is at least one set of values for the variables that satisfies all equations simultaneously. If no such set of values exists, the system is inconsistent.
Every system of linear equations can be written in the matrix form Ax = B, where:
From an intuitive standpoint, A represents a "transformation" or a "mapping" from the variable space (x) to the constant term space (B). We are asking: "Is there an 'x' that A can transform into 'B'?"
For systems with an equal number of equations and variables (i.e., A is a square matrix):
The rank of a matrix intuitively represents the "effective dimension" of the space spanned by its rows or columns. It tells us how many of the equations are truly independent.
Consider the augmented matrix [A|B], which is matrix A with the column vector B appended to it. We compare the rank of A with the rank of [A|B].
If Rank(A) ≠ Rank([A|B]):
If Rank(A) = Rank([A|B]):
For JEE, the rank method is the most robust and general approach for determining consistency, applicable to any size system, not just square ones. It provides a deeper understanding of the system's geometric properties.
Keep practicing to solidify your intuitive understanding β it's a powerful tool for solving complex problems!
In essence, testing for consistency answers the fundamental question: Can a solution be found that satisfies all given constraints simultaneously? If a system is inconsistent, it implies that the conditions are contradictory, and no solution can exist. If it is consistent, at least one solution (unique or infinite) exists, indicating that the conditions are compatible.
JEE/CBSE Perspective: While JEE Main and Advanced, and CBSE board exams, primarily focus on the theoretical understanding and computational application of the consistency test (e.g., using determinant and adjoint methods), recognizing these real-world applications provides a deeper appreciation for the mathematical tools. It highlights why this concept is so important in quantitative fields, even if direct application problems are rare in the exams themselves. The ability to model real-world scenarios into mathematical equations is a valuable skill encouraged implicitly.
Understanding when a system of equations has no solution (inconsistent) or infinitely many solutions can be just as important as finding a unique solution, guiding decision-making and problem-solving in practical situations.
When we test the consistency of a system of linear equations using matrices, we are essentially asking: "Do these equations have a common solution, and if so, how many?"
Imagine each linear equation as a 'road' or a 'rule' and the solution as a 'destination' you are trying to reach.
Consider each variable in your system as a specific type of puzzle piece and the equations as rules for how these pieces must fit together.
While matrices handle higher dimensions, our intuition is often built from 2D and 3D geometry.
Before delving into testing the consistency of a system of linear equations using matrix methods, it is crucial to have a strong grasp of certain foundational concepts in Matrices and Determinants. These prerequisites form the bedrock upon which the advanced methods are built, ensuring a clear understanding and correct application of the techniques.
Mastering these concepts will not only help in the current topic but also strengthen your overall understanding of linear algebra, which is vital for both JEE Main and Board examinations.
JEE Main Focus: Questions on testing consistency often involve applying these concepts accurately and efficiently. A strong foundation in matrix rank and elementary operations will significantly speed up problem-solving.
Make sure to practice these fundamental topics thoroughly before proceeding.
Understanding the conditions for consistency of linear equations using matrix methods is crucial, but exams often set up traps to test your fundamental understanding and attention to detail. Be aware of these common pitfalls:
By being mindful of these common traps and practicing meticulously, you can avoid losing valuable marks in the exam.
AX = B
| Condition on |A| | Condition on adj(A)B | Nature of Solution | Consistency |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. |A| β 0 | - (Not required) | Unique Solution (X = A-1B) | Consistent |
| 2. |A| = 0 | adj(A)B β O (O is the null matrix) | No Solution | Inconsistent |
| 3. |A| = 0 | adj(A)B = O (O is the null matrix) | Infinitely Many Solutions | Consistent |
JEE vs. CBSE Focus:
Convert the given system of 'n' linear equations in 'n' variables into the matrix equation AX = B, where:
Find the determinant of the coefficient matrix A, denoted as det(A) or |A|.
When det(A) = 0, the inverse A-1 does not exist, and further investigation is required. This is where most problems on consistency focus.
First, calculate the adjoint of matrix A (adj A).
Then, compute the matrix product (adj A)B.
| det(A) | (adj A)B | Consistency | Nature of Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| β 0 | (Not applicable) | Consistent | Unique Solution |
| = 0 | β O (Null Matrix) | Inconsistent | No Solution |
| = 0 | = O (Null Matrix) | Consistent | Infinitely Many Solutions |
Mastering this systematic approach will allow you to confidently tackle consistency problems in your exams.
A system of linear equations can be represented in matrix form as AX = B, where:
The consistency of the system depends on the determinant of the coefficient matrix |A| and the product adj(A)B.
Understanding and correctly applying these conditions is crucial for full marks in CBSE exams:
| Condition on |A| | Condition on adj(A)B | Result (Nature of Solution) | System Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| |A| β 0 | Not applicable | Unique Solution (X = Aβ»ΒΉB) | Consistent |
| |A| = 0 | adj(A)B = 0 (Zero matrix) | Infinitely Many Solutions | Consistent |
| |A| = 0 | adj(A)B β 0 (Non-zero matrix) | No Solution | Inconsistent |
To score well in CBSE, ensure you present your solution with clear, logical steps:
Mastering this systematic approach will ensure you handle "Test of Consistency using Matrices" questions effectively in your CBSE board examinations.
The test of consistency for a system of linear equations is a fundamental concept in Matrices and Determinants, frequently tested in JEE Main. It determines whether a given system of equations has a unique solution, no solution, or infinitely many solutions. Mastering this topic requires a strong understanding of determinants, matrix operations, and ranks.
Consider a system of n linear equations in n variables, represented in matrix form as AX = B, where:
n x n coefficient matrix.n x 1 column matrix of variables.n x 1 column matrix of constants.This method is particularly efficient for 3x3 systems in JEE problems.
det(A) (or |A|). This is the first and most crucial step.det(A):det(A) β 0, the system is consistent and has a unique solution.X = Aβ»ΒΉB can be calculated (Cramer's Rule is also applicable).det(A) = 0 (Requires further investigation)det(A) = 0, the system could have either no solution or infinitely many solutions. You must then calculate (adj A)B.det(A) = 0 AND (adj A)B β 0 (where 0 represents a column matrix of zeros), the system is inconsistent and has no solution.det(A) = 0 AND (adj A)B = 0, the system is consistent and has infinitely many solutions.This method is more general and robust, especially for systems where A is not necessarily square or when dealing with larger systems, though the determinant/adjoint method is often faster for 3x3 in JEE Main.
rank(A)): The maximum number of linearly independent rows or columns in matrix A.rank([A|B])): The maximum number of linearly independent rows or columns in the augmented matrix formed by combining A and B.| Condition | System Status |
|---|---|
rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n (number of variables) | Consistent, Unique Solution |
rank(A) = rank([A|B]) < n | Consistent, Infinitely Many Solutions |
rank(A) β rank([A|B]) | Inconsistent, No Solution |
For a homogeneous system AX = 0:
X = 0 is always a solution, known as the trivial solution).det(A) β 0, then X = 0 is the only solution.det(A) = 0, then the system has infinitely many non-trivial solutions in addition to the trivial solution. This condition (det(A) = 0 for non-trivial solutions) is very important for JEE.Ξ», k) for which the system exhibits a specific type of solution (unique, no, or infinite).det(A). This immediately separates the unique solution case from the others.3x3 matrices, be proficient in calculating determinants and adjoints quickly and accurately. Minor errors can lead to incorrect conclusions.Stay sharp and systematic! A clear approach will help you navigate complex problems with confidence.
No videos available yet.
No images available yet.
| Condition | System Type | Number of Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| rank(A) β rank([A|B]) | Inconsistent | No Solution |
| rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n | Consistent | Unique Solution |
| rank(A) = rank([A|B]) < n | Consistent | Infinitely Many Solutions |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | | | 6 |
| 3 | 3 | 4 | | | 10 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 0 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | | | 6 |
| 3 | 3 | 4 | | | 10 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | | | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | | | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 0 |
Consider a system of 3 linear equations in 3 variables (so, n=3). A student correctly finds rank(A) = 2 and rank(A|B) = 2.
Wrong Conclusion: "The system of equations is consistent."
This conclusion is incomplete and lacks the crucial detail about the nature of the solution.
For the same system of 3 linear equations in 3 variables (n=3), where rank(A) = 2 and rank(A|B) = 2.
Correct Conclusion: "The system of equations is consistent and has infinitely many solutions because rank(A) = rank(A|B) < n (2 < 3)."
This statement provides the complete and accurate nature of the solution based on the rank analysis.
[[+, -, +], [-, +, -], [+, -, +]]. Be systematic in your calculations, especially with subtractions involving negative numbers. Double-check the sign of each term contributing to the determinant or adjoint. Consider a system AX = B where you are using the determinant method.
Student calculates det(A) and gets det(A) = 0.00001.
Wrong conclusion: Since det(A) is very small, the student incorrectly assumes det(A) β 0 and proceeds to calculate (adj A)B, concluding either no solution or infinitely many solutions.
Following the previous scenario:
Student calculates det(A) = 0.00001.
Correct conclusion: Since det(A) β 0 (even though it's a very small non-zero number), the system has a unique solution and is therefore consistent.
| Condition | Type of Solution | Context |
|---|---|---|
r = n | Unique Solution | JEE Main, CBSE Boards |
r < n | Infinitely Many Solutions | JEE Main, CBSE Boards |
rank(A) β rank([A|B]) | No Solution (Inconsistent) | JEE Main, CBSE Boards |
When testing the consistency of a system of linear equations AX = B using matrices:
Consider the system:
x + y + z = 1
2x + 2y + 2z = 2
3x + 3y + 3z = 3
The coefficient matrix A =
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
For the system:
x + y + z = 1
2x + 2y + 2z = 2
3x + 3y + 3z = 3
The coefficient matrix A =
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
|A| is incorrectly calculated as zero due to a sign error when it should be non-zero, the system might be wrongly deemed inconsistent or having infinite solutions instead of a unique solution. Similarly, errors in adj(A)B can lead to incorrect conclusions about no solution/infinite solutions when |A|=0. (-1)^(i+j) for cofactors. Students might forget to alternate signs, misapply the sign for a particular element, or make a computational error during the determinant of the minor itself, which then gets compounded by the incorrect sign. This is a common oversight under exam pressure. (+ - +), (- + -), (+ - +) for a 3x3 matrix. When calculating each cofactor C_ij = (-1)^(i+j) * M_ij, first determine the minor M_ij, and then correctly multiply it by (-1)^(i+j). For the adjoint matrix, remember that adj(A) = (C_ij)^T, meaning the cofactors are transposed correctly with their accurate signs. C_12 for a 3x3 matrix where the minor M_12 evaluates to 5. A common error is to write C_12 = +5, incorrectly applying the sign. The position (1,2) requires a negative sign.M_12 = 5, the correct cofactor C_12 is (-1)^(1+2) * M_12 = -1 * 5 = -5. This sign is crucial for correctly forming the adjoint matrix and accurately evaluating |A|, which are fundamental steps for testing consistency.(-1)^(i+j) or draw the checkerboard pattern on your rough work beside the matrix.This setup mixes units for raw material B (grams on the left, but effectively mixed with kg logic), leading to an inconsistent and incorrect representation.[ 2 1 | 10 ]
[1000 2 | 15000]
This is the correct matrix to use for testing the consistency of the system, as all quantities are expressed in compatible units.[ 2 1 | 10 ]
[ 1 2 | 15 ]
The consistency of a system of linear equations AX = B (where A is the coefficient matrix, X is the variable matrix, and B is the constant matrix) is determined by comparing the rank of the coefficient matrix A and the rank of the augmented matrix [A|B]. Let 'n' be the number of variables.
| Condition | System Status | Nature of Solution |
|---|---|---|
| rank(A) = rank([A|B]) | Consistent | |
| rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n | Unique Solution | |
| rank(A) = rank([A|B]) < n | Infinitely Many Solutions | |
| rank(A) ≠ rank([A|B]) | Inconsistent | No Solution |
A student determines that for a system of 3 equations in 3 variables, rank(A) = 2 and rank([A|B]) = 2. They incorrectly conclude that the system has a unique solution because rank(A) = rank([A|B]), overlooking the critical comparison with 'n' (number of variables).
Consider a system of linear equations with 3 variables (n=3). After applying elementary row operations, suppose:
Here, rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = 2. So, the system is consistent.
Since rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = 2 < n = 3, the system has infinitely many solutions. This is the correct interpretation.
R3 → R3 - 3R2:[ 1 2 3 | 6 ]Suppose a student makes an arithmetic error while calculating the new R3:
[ 0 1 -1 | 1 ]
[ 0 3 -2 | 4 ]
-3R2: [0, -3, 3, -3]0 + 0 = 03 + (-3) = 0-2 + 3 = -1 (Error: Correct is 1)4 + (-3) = 1[ 0 0 -1 | 1 ]. This single error will lead to an incorrect Echelon form and potentially a wrong conclusion about consistency.R3 → R3 - 3R2, let's perform the correct calculations:[ 1 2 3 | 6 ]Correct calculation for the new R3:
[ 0 1 -1 | 1 ]
[ 0 3 -2 | 4 ]
0 - 3*(0) = 03 - 3*(1) = 0-2 - 3*(-1) = -2 + 3 = 14 - 3*(1) = 1[ 0 0 1 | 1 ]. This accurate step ensures the correct Echelon form and rank determination.| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
| | | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | | | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | | | 3 |
| | | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 0 |
(-1)^(i+j), or when determining the sign of cofactors. Such errors can lead to incorrect values for det(A) or adj(A)B, fundamentally altering the conclusion about the system's consistency (unique solution, no solution, or infinitely many solutions). + - +, - + -, + - + for 3x3) when expanding determinants or calculating cofactors.(-1)^(i+j) rule is known, errors can occur in the minor M_ij calculation, which then propagates to the sign.a_ij * M_ij with a_ij * C_ij where C_ij = (-1)^(i+j) * M_ij.det(A) can be expanded along any row i or column j:det(A) = ∑(k=1 to n) a_ik * C_ik (along row i)det(A) = ∑(k=1 to n) a_kj * C_kj (along column j)C_ij = (-1)^(i+j) * M_ij is the cofactor. Be particularly careful with the (-1)^(i+j) term, which dictates the sign of each cofactor. For 3x3 matrices, remember the checkerboard pattern of signs for cofactors: + - +
- + -
+ - + A = [[1, 2, -1], [2, 1, 1], [3, 3, 0]]det(A).+ for the second term's contribution, forgetting the (-1)^(1+2) term.det(A) = 1 * M_11 + 2 * M_12 + (-1) * M_13 (Incorrect sign for a_12 term)M_11 = det([[1, 1], [3, 0]]) = 1*0 - 1*3 = -3M_12 = det([[2, 1], [3, 0]]) = 2*0 - 1*3 = -3M_13 = det([[2, 1], [3, 3]]) = 2*3 - 1*3 = 3det(A) = 1*(-3) + 2*(-3) + (-1)*(3) = -3 - 6 - 3 = -12det(A) = -12 ≠ 0, the system is consistent with a unique solution.A = [[1, 2, -1], [2, 1, 1], [3, 3, 0]]a_11*C_11 + a_12*C_12 + a_13*C_13, where C_ij = (-1)^(i+j)M_ij.C_11 = (-1)^(1+1) * M_11 = +1 * (-3) = -3C_12 = (-1)^(1+2) * M_12 = -1 * (-3) = +3C_13 = (-1)^(1+3) * M_13 = +1 * (3) = +3det(A) = 1*C_11 + 2*C_12 + (-1)*C_13 = 1*(-3) + 2*(3) + (-1)*(3) = -3 + 6 - 3 = 0det(A) = 0, the system is either inconsistent (no solution) or has infinitely many solutions. Further checks (e.g., using (adj A)B) are required.+ - + pattern for the chosen row/column.C_ij individually, making sure to apply (-1)^(i+j) correctly.det(A), quickly re-evaluate at least one term's sign.rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = nrank(A) = rank([A|B]) < nrank(A) β rank([A|B])rank(A) = 2 and rank([A|B]) = 3. They incorrectly conclude that the system has a unique solution, perhaps associating different ranks with 'unique outcome'.rank(A) β rank([A|B]) implies no solution.rank(A) = 2 and rank([A|B]) = 2, then since rank(A) = rank([A|B]) < n (where n=3), the system has infinitely many solutions. If, however, rank(A) = 3 and rank([A|B]) = 3, then the system has a unique solution.x + y + z = 1
2x + 2y + 2z = 3
3x + 3y + 3z = 4
x + y + z = 1
2x + 2y + 2z = 3
3x + 3y + 3z = 4
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | 2 | | | 3 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | | | 4 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 1 |
-1 - 2 - 1 = -4det(A) β 0 for a unique solution. When det(A) = 0, students frequently stop there or incorrectly assume either 'no solution' or 'infinitely many solutions' without proper analysis of the augmented matrix. The core issue is a lack of deep understanding regarding the relationship between rank(A), rank([A|B]), and the number of variables (n). rank(A) = rank([A|B]).rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n (number of variables), the system has a unique solution.rank(A) = rank([A|B]) < n, the system has infinitely many solutions.rank(A) β rank([A|B]). In this case, there is no solution.det(A) = 0. Without further checks, they might incorrectly conclude 'infinitely many solutions' because the rows are linearly dependent, or simply state 'no unique solution' without specifying if it's no solution or infinite solutions.| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | | | 3 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | | | 4 |
rank(A): R2βR2-2R1, R3βR3-3R1 gives rows [0,0,0]. So, rank(A) = 1.rank([A|B]): Applying the same operations:| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 1 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 1 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 0 |
rank([A|B]) = 2 (non-zero rows).rank(A) = 1 and rank([A|B]) = 2, we have rank(A) β rank([A|B]). Therefore, the system has no solution.det(A)=0, always proceed to calculate both rank(A) and rank([A|B]). Never jump to conclusions.AX = B, particularly when the determinant of the coefficient matrix A is zero (i.e., det(A) = 0). They may incorrectly conclude 'no solution' directly when det(A) = 0 without a proper rank analysis. det(A) β 0 implies a unique solution) and fail to grasp the nuances when det(A) = 0. They might not clearly distinguish between the conditions rank(A) = rank(A|B) < n (infinitely many solutions) and rank(A) β rank(A|B) (no solution), where n is the number of variables. A and the augmented matrix (A|B). Let n be the number of variables in the system.rank(A) = rank(A|B)rank(A) = rank(A|B) = nrank(A) = rank(A|B) < nrank(A) β rank(A|B)det(A) = 0, as these often test the precise application of rank conditions. x + y + z = 12x + 2y + 2z = 23x + 3y + 3z = 5det(A) = 0 and immediately conclude 'no solution' or 'inconsistent' without further analysis. This is incorrect.det(A) = 0 to illustrate both 'infinitely many solutions' and 'no solution' scenarios:x + y + z = 1x + y + 2z = 22x + 2y + 3z = 3(A|B) after row operations:| x | y | z | RHS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| R2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| R3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
rank(A) = 2 (non-zero rows in A part) and rank(A|B) = 2 (non-zero rows in A|B). Number of variables n = 3. Since rank(A) = rank(A|B) < n, the system has infinitely many solutions.x + y + z = 1x + y + 2z = 22x + 2y + 3z = 5(A|B) after row operations:| x | y | z | RHS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| R2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| R3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
rank(A) = 2, but rank(A|B) = 3 (because the last row (0 0 0 | 2) represents 0 = 2, making it a non-zero row contribution to the rank of A|B). Since rank(A) β rank(A|B), the system is inconsistent (no solution).rank(A) and rank(A|B) before drawing conclusions.det(A) = 0.det(A) = 0 only implies that a unique solution is not possible; it doesn't rule out infinitely many solutions.[ 1 1 1 | 6 ][ 2 3 1 | 11 ][ 1 2 2 | 10 ][ 1 1 1 | 6 ][ 0 1 -1 | -1 ][ 0 1 1 | 4 ][ 1 1 1 | 6 ][ 0 1 -1 | -1 ][ 0 0 0 | 3 ] (Incorrectly calculating 1 - (-1) as 0)[ 1 1 1 | 6 ][ 0 1 -1 | -1 ][ 0 0 2 | 5 ]rank(A) and rank([A|B]). This directly impacts the conditions for consistency and the nature of the solution (unique, infinite, or no solution). R2 → R2 - 3R1. If R1 = [1 2 3 | 4] and R2 = [3 7 10 | 13], a student might incorrectly calculate the new second element of R2 as 7 - 3*2 = 7 - 5 = 2 (mistaking 3*2 as 5), instead of 7 - 6 = 1. Such a single calculation error propagates, leading to an incorrect pivot and ultimately a wrong rank, thus misidentifying the system's consistency.R1 = [1 2 3 | 4] and R2 = [3 7 10 | 13]. For R2 → R2 - 3R1, the correct calculation for the second element of the new R2 would be 7 - (3 * 2) = 7 - 6 = 1. Similarly, for the third element: 10 - (3 * 3) = 10 - 9 = 1, and for the augmented part: 13 - (3 * 4) = 13 - 12 = 1. The correct new R2 would be [0 1 1 | 1], ensuring the accurate determination of the matrix's rank.Given system AX = B.
If det(A) = 0, then the system has no solution. (This conclusion is incomplete and potentially incorrect, as it could also have infinite solutions.)
Given system AX = B.
If det(A) = 0, then:
1. Calculate adj(A).
2. Calculate the matrix product adj(A)B.
3. If adj(A)B = O (zero matrix), then the system has infinitely many solutions.
4. If adj(A)B β O, then the system has no solution.
(This sequence correctly addresses both possibilities when det(A) = 0.)
adj(A)B). These errors might lead to a result like 0.00001 instead of an exact 0, or vice versa. A common mistake is to then treat this numerically 'close-to-zero' value as 'approximately zero' or 'approximately non-zero' for the purpose of consistency testing. This leads to incorrect conclusions about whether a system has a unique solution, infinite solutions, or no solution, as consistency conditions demand exact equality or inequality, not approximation. det(A) = 0 or det(A) β 0, adj(A)B = O or adj(A)B β O) are binary and absolute. There is no concept of an 'approximately consistent' system.det(A) = -0.000002, when the correct value should have been 0. The student concludes: "Since det(A) is not exactly zero (it's -0.000002), the system has a unique solution and is consistent."det(A) = 0. The student correctly proceeds: "Since det(A) = 0, the system either has infinitely many solutions or no solution. We must now calculate adj(A)B. If adj(A)B = O, there are infinitely many solutions (consistent). If adj(A)B β O, there is no solution (inconsistent)."det(A) = 0 or det(A) β 0) are exact. There is no middle ground or 'approximate' state.For a 3x3 matrix:
| + | - | + |
|---|---|---|
| - | + | - |
| + | - | + |
Apply these signs diligently to the calculated minors to get the correct cofactors. Then, transpose the cofactor matrix to get the adjoint matrix.
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
Consider a system Ax = B where after calculating, det(A) = 0.
Wrong thought process: A student might incorrectly conclude, 'Since det(A) = 0, the system has no solution.' or 'Since det(A) = 0, the system has infinitely many solutions.' This is incorrect because the result of (adj A)B is not yet considered.
Consider a system Ax = B where det(A) = 0.
Correct thought process:
1. Calculate det(A). Suppose det(A) = 0.
2. Next, calculate the matrix product (adj A)B.
[ 1 1 1 | 1 ]Student applies R2 β R2 - 2R1. Mistake: Calculates 3 - 2*(1) = 0 instead of 1 for the last element.
[ 2 2 2 | 3 ]
[ 1 1 1 | 1 ]Based on this incorrect matrix, the student concludes: rank(A) = 1, rank([A|B]) = 1. Since ranks are equal, the system is deemed Consistent with infinitely many solutions (INCORRECT).
[ 0 0 0 | 0 ]
[ 1 1 1 | 1 ]Applying R2 β R2 - 2R1 correctly:
[ 2 2 2 | 3 ]
[ 1 1 1 | 1 ]From this correct matrix: rank(A) = 1 (number of non-zero rows in the coefficient matrix part), rank([A|B]) = 2 (number of non-zero rows in the augmented matrix). Since rank(A) β rank([A|B]), the system is Inconsistent (No solution) (CORRECT).
[ 0 0 0 | 1 ]
The conditions for consistency and the nature of solutions are very precise:
Consider a system of linear equations with 3 unknowns (x, y, z). After performing row operations, a student correctly finds that Ο(A) = 2 and Ο([A|B]) = 2.
Wrong Conclusion: The student writes, "Since Ο(A) = Ο([A|B]), the system has a unique solution."
Reason for Error: The student failed to compare the rank with 'n' (number of unknowns), which is 3 in this case. Since Ο(A) = 2 is not equal to n = 3, it cannot be a unique solution.
Using the same example as above: a system with 3 unknowns (x, y, z).
After row operations, suppose the row-reduced echelon form of the augmented matrix is:
| x | y | z | Constant | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 2 | | | 5 |
| 0 | 1 | -1 | | | 3 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 0 |
Here:
Correct Conclusion: Since Ο(A) = Ο([A|B]) = 2, the system is consistent. Furthermore, since Ο(A) = 2 < n = 3, the system has infinitely many solutions.
| + | - | + |
|---|---|---|
| - | + | - |
| + | - | + |
R2 → R2 - 2R1).rank(A) and rank([A|B]) with the number of variables (n) to determine consistency.det(A) = 0. A student, due to an arithmetic error (e.g., wrong sign, miscalculation of a product), incorrectly calculates det(A) = 2.det(A) ≠ 0, the system has a unique solution (which is critically incorrect as the actual determinant is zero). They stop here, failing to investigate ranks.det(A) = 0.det(A) = 0, proceed to find the rank of the coefficient matrix (A) and the augmented matrix ([A|B]) using elementary row operations.rank(A). Similarly, reduce [A|B] to its row echelon form and determine rank([A|B]).rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n (number of variables), then it has a unique solution. If rank(A) = rank([A|B]) < n, then it has infinitely many solutions. If rank(A) ≠ rank([A|B]), then it is inconsistent (no solution).A critical mistake students make in the CBSE 12th examination regarding the consistency of a system of linear equations is prematurely concluding inconsistency when the determinant of the coefficient matrix, |A|, is zero. While det(A) = 0 is a necessary condition for inconsistency, it is not sufficient. This often leads to incorrect answers for problems that actually have infinitely many solutions.
When testing the consistency of a system of linear equations Ax = B:
Consider the system:
x + y + z = 1
2x + 2y + 2z = 2
3x + 3y + 3z = 3
Coefficient matrix A =
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
Wrong Conclusion: "Since det(A) = 0, the system is inconsistent."
Using the same system:
x + y + z = 1
2x + 2y + 2z = 2
3x + 3y + 3z = 3
A =
| 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
Next, calculate adj(A). All cofactors for A are 0. Therefore, adj(A) =
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
Now, compute adj(A)B =
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 |
Correct Conclusion: "Since det(A) = 0 AND adj(A)B = O, the system is consistent and has infinitely many solutions."
x liters of liquid A and y kilograms of solid B. The total combined 'quantity' is 10 units.' A student incorrectly forms the equation: x + y = 10. This is dimensionally inconsistent because liters (volume) cannot be directly added to kilograms (mass) to yield a meaningful 'total quantity'.d_A kg/liter, then the mass of A is x * d_A kg. The correct dimensionally consistent equation for total mass would be: (x * d_A) + y = 10 (where 10 would represent total mass in kg). Similarly, for total volume, if the density of solid B is d_B kg/liter, then its volume is y / d_B liters, leading to: x + (y / d_B) = 10 (where 10 would represent total volume in liters).x = volume in liters).| Condition | System Consistency | Nature of Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| det(A) ≠ 0 | Consistent | Unique Solution |
| det(A) = 0 AND (adj A)B = O (zero matrix) | Consistent | Infinitely Many Solutions |
| det(A) = 0 AND (adj A)B ≠ O (non-zero matrix) | Inconsistent | No Solution |
Consider the system:
x + y = 2
2x + 2y = 4
Coefficient matrix A = [[1, 1], [2, 2]]
|A| = (1*2) - (1*2) = 2 - 2 = 0.
Wrong Conclusion: Since |A|=0, the system is inconsistent (no solution).For the system:
x + y = 2
2x + 2y = 4
A = [[1, 1], [2, 2]], B = [[2], [4]]
|A| = 0.
Calculate adj A:
adj A = [[2, -1], [-2, 1]]
Calculate (adj A)B:
(adj A)B = [[2, -1], [-2, 1]] * [[2], [4]]
= [[(2*2) + (-1*4)], [(-2*2) + (1*4)]]
= [[4 - 4], [-4 + 4]]
= [[0], [0]] = O.
Correct Conclusion: Since (adj A)B = O, the system is consistent and has infinitely many solutions.rank(A) = 2 and rank(A|B) = 2. They incorrectly conclude that the system has a unique solution because the ranks are equal. The critical mistake is not comparing the rank with the number of variables, n=3.| Rank(A) | Rank(A|B) | Number of Variables (n) | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 3 | Inconsistent (No Solution) |
| 3 | 3 | 3 | Unique Solution |
| 2 | 2 | 3 | Infinitely Many Solutions |
Lack of Conceptual Clarity: Students may memorize the rank conditions without truly understanding their implications, especially for systems with infinite solutions versus no solution.
Incomplete Case Analysis: When parameters are present, students often fail to consider all possible cases for the parameter's value that affect the rank (e.g., when a determinant becomes zero, or a row reduces to all zeros).
Hasty Conclusion: Rushing to conclusions after calculating ranks without meticulously comparing rank(A) and rank([A|B]) and comparing them with the number of variables (n).
To test the consistency of a system of linear equations AX = B with n variables:
Form the augmented matrix [A|B].
Reduce [A|B] to its Echelon form using elementary row operations.
Determine rank(A) (number of non-zero rows in the Echelon form of A) and rank([A|B]) (number of non-zero rows in the Echelon form of [A|B]).
Apply the conditions:
If rank(A) β rank([A|B]): The system is inconsistent (no solution).
If rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n (number of variables): The system is consistent and has a unique solution.
If rank(A) = rank([A|B]) < n: The system is consistent and has infinitely many solutions (with n - rank(A) free variables).
For systems with parameters, analyze each case for the parameter's value carefully, as it can change the ranks and the nature of solutions.
Consider the system:
x + y + z = 1
x + 2y + 3z = 2
2x + 3y + Ξ»z = ΞΌAfter row operations, the augmented matrix [A|B] reduces to:
[[1, 1, 1 | 1],
[0, 1, 2 | 1],
[0, 0, Ξ»-4 | ΞΌ-3]]Student's Incorrect Reasoning: "I see a row of zeros in the 'A' part if Ξ»=4. So, if Ξ»=4, the system always has infinite solutions because rank(A) will be less than n=3."
This is a critical mistake because it ignores the condition on 'B' (the right-hand side, ΞΌ-3) for consistency. If Ξ»=4, but ΞΌ β 3, the system is inconsistent (no solution), not infinite solutions. The student fails to correctly compare rank(A) and rank([A|B]) when Ξ»=4.
Using the same system as above, with the augmented matrix reduced to:
[[1, 1, 1 | 1],
[0, 1, 2 | 1],
[0, 0, Ξ»-4 | ΞΌ-3]]Correct Analysis: Number of variables n = 3.
Case 1: Ξ» - 4 β 0 (i.e., Ξ» β 4)
In this case, there are three non-zero rows in both A and [A|B].
So, rank(A) = 3 and rank([A|B]) = 3.
Since rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n = 3, the system is consistent and has a unique solution.
Case 2: Ξ» - 4 = 0 (i.e., Ξ» = 4)
The augmented matrix becomes:
[[1, 1, 1 | 1],
[0, 1, 2 | 1],
[0, 0, 0 | ΞΌ-3]]Subcase 2a: ΞΌ - 3 β 0 (i.e., ΞΌ β 3)
Here, rank(A) = 2 (from the first two rows of the coefficient part).
However, rank([A|B]) = 3 (due to the non-zero element ΞΌ-3 in the last row).
Since rank(A) β rank([A|B]), the system is inconsistent and has no solution.
Subcase 2b: ΞΌ - 3 = 0 (i.e., ΞΌ = 3)
Here, the last row is entirely zero: [0, 0, 0 | 0].
So, rank(A) = 2 and rank([A|B]) = 2.
Since rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = 2 < n = 3, the system is consistent and has infinitely many solutions.
This detailed analysis correctly covers all scenarios based on the parameters Ξ» and ΞΌ.
Master Rank Definition: Ensure a strong understanding of what matrix rank means and how to calculate it accurately for both A and [A|B].
Memorize & Understand Conditions: Do not just memorize the consistency conditions; understand why each condition (rank(A) = rank([A|B]) = n, rank(A) = rank([A|B]) < n, rank(A) β rank([A|B])) leads to its specific solution type.
Systematic Case Analysis: For problems involving parameters, always perform a systematic case analysis. Identify all critical values of the parameter(s) where the rank might change (e.g., when a determinant becomes zero, or a leading coefficient of a row becomes zero).
Verify Each Case: After reducing the matrix, explicitly write down rank(A) and rank([A|B]) for each case of the parameter(s) and then compare them with n.
Practice with Parameters: Solve numerous problems involving systems with parameters to gain experience in handling different scenarios and avoid overlooking critical cases.
| F1 | F2 | RHS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eq 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Eq 2 | 2 | 0.05 | 500 |
| x | y | RHS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eq 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Eq 2 | 2 | 500 | 20 |
| x | y | RHS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eq 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Eq 2 | 2 | 0 | 15 |
rank(A), rank(A|B), and the number of variables (n) for each solution type.A and the augmented matrix A|B.rank(A) and rank(A|B), typically by reducing both to Echelon form using elementary row operations. This is crucial when dealing with parameters.rank(A) = rank(A|B) = nrank(A) = rank(A|B) < n (This implies (n - rank(A)) free variables).rank(A) β rank(A|B)x + y + z = 1x + 2y + 3z = k2x + y + (k-1)z = 2det(A) = 0 for a specific k value and immediately conclude 'infinite solutions' without checking rank(A|B) for that specific k. This can lead to an incorrect answer if rank(A) β rank(A|B) for that k, implying no solution.A = [[1, 1, 1], [1, 2, 3], [2, 1, k-1]]A|B = [[1, 1, 1, 1], [1, 2, 3, k], [2, 1, k-1, 2]]R2 -> R2-R1, R3 -> R3-2R1, then R3 -> R3+R2), the augmented matrix can be reduced to an Echelon form like:[[1, 1, 1, 1], [0, 1, 2, k-1], [0, 0, k-4, 2-k]]k-4 β 0 (i.e., k β 4): rank(A) = 3 and rank(A|B) = 3. Since n=3, the system has a unique solution.k = 4: The matrix becomes [[1, 1, 1, 1], [0, 1, 2, 3], [0, 0, 0, -2]]. rank(A) = 2 (non-zero rows in A) but rank(A|B) = 3 (since the last row of A|B is [0 0 0 -2]). rank(A) β rank(A|B), the system is inconsistent (no solution) when k=4.det(A)=0.A and A|B, compute their ranks, and then compare them with each other and with 'n'.A. It's a necessary but not sufficient condition for complete analysis beyond unique solutions.| 1 | 1 | | | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 | | | 4 |
| 3 | 3 | | | 6 |
| 1 | 1 | | | 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | | | 0 |
| 0 | 0 | | | 0 |
rank(A) = rank(A|B)). The true critical error, often of similar impact to a unit conversion mistake in other subjects, is the fundamental misinterpretation of the rank conditions themselves. rank(A) = rank(A|B) = n (unique solution), rank(A) = rank(A|B) < n (infinite solutions), or rank(A) ≠ rank(A|B) (no solution). rank(A) = rank(A|B) = nrank(A) = rank(A|B) < nrank(A) ≠ rank(A|B)x + 2y + 3z = 6 (Eq. 1)2x + 4y + 6z = 10 (Eq. 2)rank(A) = rank(A|B) when they are actually different, leading to a wrong conclusion about consistency.x + 2y + 3z = 62x + 4y + 6z = 10| x | y | z | RHS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| R2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
R2 → R2 - 2R1:| x | y | z | RHS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| R2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
A (first three columns) is 1 (due to the non-zero row R1).A|B (all columns) is 2 (due to non-zero rows R1 and R2).rank(A) ≠ rank(A|B) (1 ≠ 2), the system is inconsistent and has no solution. No unit conversion is involved; only numerical rank calculation and condition interpretation.rank(A), rank(A|B), and n (number of variables) for unique, infinite, or no solutions.det(A), adj(A), and consequently, wrong conclusions about the consistency of the system (unique solution, no solution, or infinitely many solutions). Another common mistake is misplacing or overlooking signs when forming the augmented matrix [A|B] from the given system of linear equations. (-1)^(i+j) * M_ij). Sometimes, simple arithmetic mistakes with negative numbers during matrix multiplication also contribute. Overlooking negative signs in the original equations while forming the augmented matrix is another frequent oversight. C_ij = (-1)^(i+j) * M_ij, where M_ij is the minor. Double-check each sign during cofactor calculation. When forming the augmented matrix [A|B], ensure that all coefficients of variables (for matrix A) and constant terms (for matrix B) are accurately transcribed, including their respective signs, from the system of equations. Perform matrix multiplications step-by-step, especially when negative numbers are involved, to minimize arithmetic errors. C_12 (element in row 1, column 2) for the matrix A.M_12 is calculated as -3.C_12 = M_12 = -3, ignoring the (-1)^(i+j) factor for cofactors. This error drastically changes the determinant or adjoint matrix.M_12 = -3.C_12, i=1 and j=2. So, (-1)^(1+2) = (-1)^3 = -1.C_12 = (-1) * M_12 = (-1) * (-3) = 3.+ - +
- + -
+ - +
[A|B], verifying each coefficient and constant term's sign. This step is often rushed.(-1)^(i+j) sign before recording the cofactor value.(adj(A))B), carry out multiplications and additions/subtractions step-by-step, especially when negative numbers are involved. Consider doing an intermediate check of signs.det(A) = 0 vs. det(A) β 0, or rank equality) are absolute and do not allow for 'close enough' approximations.[[1, 1, 1],
[1, 2, 3],
[2, 3, 4]]
det(A) = 0.001 instead of 0. Based on this 'small non-zero' value, they incorrectly conclude that the system has a unique solution. This is a critical error, as the system actually behaves very differently when det(A) is exactly zero.[[1, 1, 1],
[1, 2, 3],
[2, 3, 4]]
[[1, 1, 1, | 1],
[1, 2, 3, | 2],
[2, 3, 4, | 3]]
[[1, 1, 1, | 1],
[0, 1, 2, | 1],
[0, 1, 2, | 1]]
[[1, 1, 1, | 1],
[0, 1, 2, | 1],
[0, 0, 0, | 0]]
det(A) and the ranks, especially if the calculations are complex or involve unknown parameters, as these are the pivot points for determining solution nature.| x | y | z | | | Constant | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 6 |
| R2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | | | 10 |
| R3 | 2 | 3 | 4 | | | 20 |
R2 → R2 - R1R3 → R3 - 2R1| x | y | z | | | Constant | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 6 |
| R2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | | | 4 |
| R3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | | | 8 |
R3 → R3 - R2| x | y | z | | | Constant | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | | | 6 |
| R2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | | | 4 |
| R3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | | 4 |
rank(A) ≠ rank(A|B) (2 ≠ 3), the system is inconsistent and has no solution. The initial assumption based solely on det(A) = 0 was incorrect.[A|B] for non-homogeneous systems.[A|B] to its echelon form. This is crucial for correctly determining ranks.rank(A) ≠ rank(A|B), the system is inconsistent (no solution).rank(A) = rank(A|B) = n (number of variables), the system is consistent with a unique solution.rank(A) = rank(A|B) < n, the system is consistent with infinitely many solutions.AX = 0, rank(A) will always equal rank(A|0), meaning homogeneous systems are always consistent. The conditions then simplify to rank(A) = n for a unique trivial solution, and rank(A) < n for infinitely many non-trivial solutions.No summary available yet.
No educational resource available yet.