📖Topic Explanations

🌐 Overview
Hello students! Welcome to Displacement reactions and disproportionation!

Prepare to dive into the dynamic world of chemical reactions, where elements assert their dominance and sometimes, a single element performs an incredible chemical juggling act. Mastering these concepts will not only sharpen your understanding of reactivity but also give you a powerful edge in predicting reaction outcomes.

Have you ever wondered how one element can literally kick another out of its place in a compound? Or how a single element can bizarrely decide to oxidize itself and reduce itself at the same time? These aren't magic tricks, but fundamental chemical phenomena that govern countless processes around us, from industrial metal extraction to the complex biochemistry within our bodies.

In this overview, we'll introduce you to two fascinating categories of reactions:

1.

Displacement Reactions: The Chemical Showdown


Imagine a more powerful friend taking your seat. That's essentially what happens in a displacement reaction. Here, a more reactive element displaces a less reactive element from its compound. It's a fundamental concept rooted in the reactivity series, which dictates the pecking order of elements. You'll learn how metals displace other metals, how non-metals displace non-metals, and the conditions under which these chemical "takeovers" occur. Understanding these reactions is crucial for comprehending topics like electrochemistry, corrosion, and the practical extraction of metals from their ores.

2.

Disproportionation Reactions: The Self-Redox Dance


Now, prepare for something even more intriguing: disproportionation reactions. This is a special type of redox reaction where a single element, within a single reactant molecule, is simultaneously oxidized and reduced to different oxidation states. It's like one individual splitting into two, with one part gaining electrons and the other losing them. These reactions are often observed in elements that can exist in multiple oxidation states and are pivotal for understanding the behavior of compounds like hydrogen peroxide, halogens, and various phosphorus compounds.

For both your CBSE board exams and the challenging IIT JEE, a strong grasp of displacement and disproportionation reactions is non-negotiable. They are frequently tested for predicting products, balancing equations, and understanding the nuances of redox chemistry.

Get ready to explore the underlying principles, the factors influencing these reactions, and how to confidently identify and analyze them. By the end of this module, you'll be able to predict who wins the chemical showdown and recognize when an element is performing its impressive self-redox dance! Let's embark on this exciting chemical journey!
📚 Fundamentals
Alright class, welcome back! Today, we're diving into two fascinating and super important types of redox reactions: Displacement reactions and Disproportionation reactions. Don't worry if the names sound a bit intimidating; we'll break them down step-by-step, just like building with LEGOs, starting from the very basics. By the end of this session, you'll not only understand what they are but also be able to identify them and even predict their outcomes!

Remember, all these reactions fall under the big umbrella of Redox Reactions, where oxidation and reduction happen simultaneously. So, keep your knowledge of oxidation states handy!

---

### 1. Understanding Displacement Reactions: The 'Kicking Out' Game!

Let's start with something familiar. What does "displacement" mean in everyday language? It means one thing taking the place of another, right? Like when you displace water in a tub and the water level rises, or when a stronger player displaces a weaker one from a team.

In chemistry, displacement reactions are exactly like this! They are reactions where a more reactive element displaces (or 'kicks out') a less reactive element from its compound. Think of it as a chemical "turf war" where the stronger, more reactive element wins!

These reactions always involve:
1. An element (let's call it 'A')
2. A compound (let's call it 'BC')

And the general form looks something like this:

A + BC → AC + B

Here, element 'A' is more reactive than element 'B', so 'A' takes 'B's place in the compound 'BC', forming 'AC' and leaving 'B' as a free element.

Let's look at the two main types of displacement reactions:

#### 1.1. Metal Displacement Reactions

This is one of the most common types. Here, a more reactive metal displaces a less reactive metal from its salt solution. How do we know which metal is more reactive? We use something called the Activity Series (or Reactivity Series) of metals. You've probably seen it before, listing metals in decreasing order of their reactivity.























Metal Reactivity
Potassium (K)Most Reactive
Sodium (Na)
Calcium (Ca)
Magnesium (Mg)
Aluminum (Al)
Zinc (Zn)
Iron (Fe)
Lead (Pb)
Hydrogen (H)*
Copper (Cu)
Silver (Ag)
Gold (Au)Least Reactive
Platinum (Pt)

*Hydrogen is included for reference as metals above it can displace hydrogen from acids.

A metal higher in this series can displace a metal lower in the series from its solution. Let's see an example:

Example 1: Zinc displacing Copper

Imagine you dip a shiny piece of zinc metal (Zn) into a solution of copper(II) sulfate (CuSO₄), which is typically blue.


Reaction: Zn(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → ZnSO₄(aq) + Cu(s)


Let's break this down:
1. Who is the 'kicker'? Zinc (Zn) is a free element.
2. Who is being 'kicked out'? Copper (Cu) from copper(II) sulfate.
3. Check reactivity: Look at the activity series. Zinc is above Copper. This means Zinc is more reactive than Copper. So, Zinc *can* displace Copper!
4. What happens visually? Over time, the blue color of the solution fades (as CuSO₄ is consumed) and a reddish-brown deposit of copper metal appears on the zinc strip. The zinc strip itself might appear to corrode as it forms zinc sulfate.

Now, let's look at the redox aspect:
* Original Oxidation States:
* Zn (elemental): 0
* Cu in CuSO₄: +2 (S is -2, O is -2; let's say SO₄²⁻ is -2, so Cu is +2)
* S in CuSO₄: +6
* O in CuSO₄: -2
* Final Oxidation States:
* Zn in ZnSO₄: +2 (SO₄²⁻ is -2, so Zn is +2)
* Cu (elemental): 0
* What happened?
* Zinc went from 0 to +2. This is an increase in oxidation state, meaning Zinc got oxidized (it lost electrons).
* Copper went from +2 to 0. This is a decrease in oxidation state, meaning Copper got reduced (it gained electrons).

See? It's a classic redox reaction!

Example 2: Iron nail in Copper Sulfate Solution (A classic school experiment!)

If you put an iron nail (Fe) into a copper(II) sulfate (CuSO₄) solution:


Reaction: Fe(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → FeSO₄(aq) + Cu(s)


* Iron (Fe) is more reactive than Copper (Cu) (check the activity series!).
* Iron goes from 0 to +2 (oxidized).
* Copper goes from +2 to 0 (reduced).
* You'll see a reddish-brown deposit of copper on the nail, and the blue solution will gradually turn pale green (due to the formation of FeSO₄).

#### 1.2. Non-Metal Displacement Reactions

Just like metals, non-metals also have an activity series, especially the halogens (Group 17 elements: F, Cl, Br, I). Their reactivity generally decreases as you go down the group. So, Fluorine is the most reactive, then Chlorine, Bromine, and Iodine is the least reactive among common halogens.

A more reactive non-metal can displace a less reactive non-metal from its salt solution. This is very common with halogens.

Example 3: Chlorine displacing Bromine

If you bubble chlorine gas (Cl₂) through a solution of potassium bromide (KBr):


Reaction: Cl₂(g) + 2KBr(aq) → 2KCl(aq) + Br₂(aq)


Let's analyze:
1. Who is the 'kicker'? Chlorine (Cl₂) is a free element.
2. Who is being ' kicked out'? Bromine (Br) from potassium bromide.
3. Check reactivity: Chlorine is above Bromine in the halogen group, meaning Chlorine is more reactive. So, Chlorine *can* displace Bromine!
4. What happens visually? The colorless potassium bromide solution turns orange-brown as bromine liquid (Br₂) is formed.

Now, for the redox part:
* Original Oxidation States:
* Cl in Cl₂: 0
* Br in KBr: -1 (K is +1)
* Final Oxidation States:
* Cl in KCl: -1 (K is +1)
* Br in Br₂: 0
* What happened?
* Chlorine went from 0 to -1. This is a decrease in oxidation state, meaning Chlorine got reduced (it gained electrons).
* Bromine went from -1 to 0. This is an increase in oxidation state, meaning Bromine got oxidized (it lost electrons).

Key Takeaway for Displacement Reactions:
* Always involve an element reacting with a compound.
* The displacing element is always more reactive than the element it displaces.
* They are fundamentally redox reactions where one element is oxidized and another is reduced.

---

### 2. Understanding Disproportionation Reactions: The 'Self-Split' Game!

Now, this type of reaction is a bit more unique and might seem counter-intuitive at first, but it's super interesting!

A disproportionation reaction is a special type of redox reaction where the same element, in a particular oxidation state, simultaneously undergoes oxidation AND reduction.

Confusing? Let's use an analogy. Imagine a person who starts off with a moderate amount of money. In a single event, this person manages to both gain a lot of money (like an oxidation, moving to a higher state) AND lose a lot of money (like a reduction, moving to a lower state), resulting in two different financial outcomes *from the same starting point*. The key here is the 'same element' part.

For an element to disproportionate, it must exist in at least three different oxidation states: the intermediate one (which disproportionates) and two others (one higher, one lower) that it forms.

Let's look at some classic examples:

Example 4: Decomposition of Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂)

Hydrogen peroxide is famous for this! It's an unstable compound that readily decomposes, especially in the presence of light or catalysts.


Reaction: 2H₂O₂(aq) → 2H₂O(l) + O₂(g)


Let's pinpoint the element undergoing disproportionation: Oxygen.
* Original Oxidation States:
* In H₂O₂ (hydrogen peroxide), hydrogen is +1. Since there are two hydrogens (+2 total), the two oxygens must total -2. So, each Oxygen is -1. This is the intermediate state.
* Final Oxidation States:
* In H₂O (water), hydrogen is +1. So, Oxygen is -2. This is a lower oxidation state.
* In O₂ (oxygen gas), Oxygen is 0 (elemental form). This is a higher oxidation state.
* What happened to Oxygen?
* Some Oxygen went from -1 to -2 (in H₂O). This is a decrease in oxidation state, meaning it got reduced.
* Some other Oxygen went from -1 to 0 (in O₂). This is an increase in oxidation state, meaning it got oxidized.

So, the same element (Oxygen, starting at -1) simultaneously ended up in a lower (-2) and a higher (0) oxidation state. That's a perfect example of disproportionation!

Example 5: Chlorine reacting with a dilute, cold alkali (like NaOH)

Halogens, particularly chlorine, bromine, and iodine, often show disproportionation reactions, especially when reacting with bases. The products depend heavily on reaction conditions (temperature, concentration). Let's take chlorine with cold, dilute sodium hydroxide.


Reaction: Cl₂(g) + 2NaOH(aq) → NaCl(aq) + NaClO(aq) + H₂O(l)

(You might recognize NaClO as sodium hypochlorite, the main ingredient in household bleach!)

Let's focus on Chlorine:
* Original Oxidation States:
* In Cl₂ (chlorine gas), Chlorine is 0 (elemental form). This is our intermediate state.
* Final Oxidation States:
* In NaCl (sodium chloride), Sodium is +1, so Chlorine is -1. This is a lower oxidation state.
* In NaClO (sodium hypochlorite), Sodium is +1, Oxygen is -2. For the compound to be neutral, Chlorine must be +1. This is a higher oxidation state.
* What happened to Chlorine?
* Some Chlorine went from 0 to -1 (in NaCl). It got reduced.
* Some other Chlorine went from 0 to +1 (in NaClO). It got oxidized.

Again, the same element (Chlorine, starting at 0) underwent both oxidation and reduction.

Key Takeaway for Disproportionation Reactions:
* A single element in the reactant acts as both the oxidizing agent and the reducing agent.
* The element must have an intermediate oxidation state to start with, and it forms products with higher and lower oxidation states.

---

### 3. Comparing Displacement and Disproportionation Reactions

Let's put them side-by-side to highlight the differences:




































Feature Displacement Reaction Disproportionation Reaction
Definition A more reactive element replaces a less reactive element from its compound. An element in a specific oxidation state is simultaneously oxidized and reduced to different oxidation states.
Reactants Typically an element and a compound. A compound where a specific element exists in an intermediate oxidation state, or an elemental form that can act as both.
Element Undergoing Redox Two different elements: one gets oxidized, one gets reduced. Only one element undergoes both oxidation AND reduction.
Oxidation States The displacing element's oxidation state increases (oxidized). The displaced element's oxidation state decreases (reduced). The same element's oxidation state both increases (oxidized) and decreases (reduced) from its starting intermediate state.
Example Zn(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → ZnSO₄(aq) + Cu(s) 2H₂O₂(aq) → 2H₂O(l) + O₂(g)


---

### Conclusion

Understanding displacement and disproportionation reactions is crucial for mastering redox chemistry. They illustrate how elements behave differently based on their reactivity and their possible oxidation states. Whether it's a stronger metal kicking out a weaker one, or an element performing a 'self-redox' act, both reaction types are fundamental building blocks in your journey through inorganic and physical chemistry, especially for competitive exams like JEE! Keep practicing identifying oxidation states, and you'll become a pro at these in no time!
🔬 Deep Dive
Alright, aspiring chemists! Let's dive deep into two fascinating categories of redox reactions: Displacement Reactions and Disproportionation Reactions. These aren't just theoretical concepts; understanding them is crucial for predicting chemical behavior, understanding electrochemical processes, and absolutely essential for cracking those JEE problems.

### DETAILED EXPLANATION: Displacement Reactions and Disproportionation

#### 1. Displacement Reactions: The "Swap" Game in Chemistry

Imagine a school playground where a stronger, more popular kid comes along and takes the place of a weaker kid in a game. In chemistry, displacement reactions are quite similar!

What is a Displacement Reaction?
A displacement reaction, often also called a single displacement reaction or substitution reaction, is a type of chemical reaction where one element displaces another element from its compound. This always involves a change in the oxidation states of at least two elements, making it inherently a redox reaction.

The general form of a displacement reaction is:
A + BX → AX + B
Here, element 'A' displaces element 'B' from its compound 'BX'. For this to happen, element 'A' must be more reactive (or have a greater tendency to lose or gain electrons, depending on the context) than element 'B'.

Let's break down the redox aspect:
* Element A starts in its elemental form (oxidation state 0) and gets oxidized to form part of compound AX.
* Element B starts in a compound BX (non-zero oxidation state) and gets reduced to its elemental form (oxidation state 0).

Types of Displacement Reactions (with JEE focus):

Understanding the types of displacement reactions is crucial, especially when you need to predict products or reaction feasibility in exams.

a) Metal-Metal Displacement:
This is perhaps the most common type. A more reactive metal displaces a less reactive metal from its salt solution. The reactivity is determined by the metal's tendency to lose electrons (its reducing power).

Example 1: Zinc displacing Copper
When a zinc rod is dipped into a copper sulfate solution, zinc metal gets coated with copper.
Zn(s) + CuSO4(aq) → ZnSO4(aq) + Cu(s)

Let's look at the oxidation states:
* In reactants: Zn is 0, Cu in CuSO4 is +2.
* In products: Zn in ZnSO4 is +2, Cu is 0.
* Zinc (Zn): Oxidation state changes from 0 to +2. It is oxidized (loses electrons) and acts as a reducing agent.
* Copper (Cu): Oxidation state changes from +2 to 0. It is reduced (gains electrons) and acts as an oxidizing agent.

Why does this happen? (JEE Concept: Reactivity Series and Standard Electrode Potentials)
Zinc is more reactive than copper. In terms of electrochemistry, zinc has a more negative standard reduction potential (E° Zn²⁺/Zn = -0.76 V) compared to copper (E° Cu²⁺/Cu = +0.34 V). A more negative E° indicates a greater tendency to get oxidized, meaning Zn is a stronger reducing agent than Cu. Therefore, Zn readily loses electrons to Cu²⁺ ions.

General Rule: A metal higher in the electrochemical series (more negative E° or stronger reducing agent) will displace a metal lower in the series (less negative E° or weaker reducing agent) from its salt solution.

b) Metal-Hydrogen Displacement:
More reactive metals can displace hydrogen from acids or even water.

Example 2: Magnesium displacing Hydrogen from Acid
When magnesium metal reacts with hydrochloric acid, hydrogen gas is evolved.
Mg(s) + 2HCl(aq) → MgCl2(aq) + H2(g)

* Oxidation states: Mg (0) → Mg (+2); H (+1) → H (0).
* Magnesium (Mg): Oxidized from 0 to +2.
* Hydrogen (H): Reduced from +1 to 0.

Example 3: Sodium displacing Hydrogen from Water
Highly reactive metals like sodium, potassium, and calcium can even displace hydrogen from cold water.
2Na(s) + 2H2O(l) → 2NaOH(aq) + H2(g)

* Oxidation states: Na (0) → Na (+1); H (+1) in H2O → H (0) in H2.
* Sodium (Na): Oxidized from 0 to +1.
* Hydrogen (H): Reduced from +1 to 0.

JEE Focus: Only metals placed above hydrogen in the electrochemical series (those with negative standard reduction potentials) can displace hydrogen from acids. Very reactive metals can displace H from water. Less reactive metals like iron and zinc require steam to displace hydrogen.

c) Nonmetal-Nonmetal Displacement (Halogen Displacement):
This often involves halogens. A more reactive halogen (stronger oxidizing agent) displaces a less reactive halogen (weaker oxidizing agent) from its salt solution. The reactivity of halogens decreases down the group (F > Cl > Br > I).

Example 4: Chlorine displacing Bromine
When chlorine gas is bubbled through a potassium bromide solution, the solution turns reddish-brown due to the formation of bromine.
Cl2(g) + 2KBr(aq) → 2KCl(aq) + Br2(aq)

* Oxidation states: Cl (0) → Cl (-1); Br (-1) → Br (0).
* Chlorine (Cl): Reduced from 0 to -1. It is the oxidizing agent.
* Bromine (Br): Oxidized from -1 to 0. It is the reducing agent.

Why does this happen? (JEE Concept: Oxidizing Power of Halogens)
Chlorine is more electronegative and a stronger oxidizing agent than bromine. This means Cl2 has a greater tendency to gain electrons (get reduced) than Br2. Hence, Cl2 can oxidize Br⁻ ions to Br2.

d) Other Displacement Reactions:
While less common as a distinct category, reactions like a metal displacing oxygen from a metal oxide at high temperatures (e.g., in metallurgy) can also be considered displacement.
2Al(s) + Fe2O3(s) → Al2O3(s) + 2Fe(s)  (Thermite reaction)

Here, Al (0) gets oxidized to Al (+3) and Fe (+3) gets reduced to Fe (0).

#### 2. Disproportionation Reactions: The Self-Oxidation-Reduction

Now, let's move to a truly unique and interesting type of redox reaction where an element performs a dual role – it oxidizes itself and reduces itself simultaneously!

What is a Disproportionation Reaction?
A disproportionation reaction is a special type of redox reaction in which a single element in a given oxidation state is simultaneously oxidized and reduced.

This means that the same element, starting in one intermediate oxidation state, ends up in at least two different oxidation states in the products: one higher (oxidized) and one lower (reduced) than the initial state.

Key Condition for Disproportionation:
For an element to undergo disproportionation, it must exist in at least three different oxidation states:
1. The initial, intermediate oxidation state.
2. A higher oxidation state (to be oxidized to).
3. A lower oxidation state (to be reduced to).

Let's look at some classic examples that are frequently tested in JEE.

Example 1: Disproportionation of Chlorine in Alkaline Medium
Chlorine gas (Cl2, oxidation state 0) can undergo disproportionation depending on the temperature and concentration of the alkali.

a) Cold, Dilute NaOH:
Cl2(g) + 2NaOH(aq) → NaCl(aq) + NaClO(aq) + H2O(l)

Let's analyze the oxidation states of Chlorine:
* Cl2: Oxidation state 0.
* NaCl: Cl is -1 (reduced).
* NaClO (Sodium Hypochlorite): Cl is +1 (oxidized).
Here, Chlorine (0) disproportionates into Cl (-1) and Cl (+1).

b) Hot, Concentrated NaOH:
Under harsher conditions, chlorine disproportionates further.
3Cl2(g) + 6NaOH(aq) → 5NaCl(aq) + NaClO3(aq) + 3H2O(l)

* Cl2: Oxidation state 0.
* NaCl: Cl is -1 (reduced).
* NaClO3 (Sodium Chlorate): Cl is +5 (oxidized).
Here, Chlorine (0) disproportionates into Cl (-1) and Cl (+5).

JEE Note: The pH significantly influences the products of halogen disproportionation. In acidic medium, halogens typically do not disproportionate but act as oxidizing agents. In basic medium, they do.

Example 2: Disproportionation of Hydrogen Peroxide
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is inherently unstable and readily disproportionates into water and oxygen. This is why it's stored in dark bottles.
2H2O2(aq) → 2H2O(l) + O2(g)

Let's analyze the oxidation states of Oxygen:
* H2O2: Oxygen is in an intermediate oxidation state of -1 (peroxide linkage).
* H2O: Oxygen is -2 (reduced).
* O2: Oxygen is 0 (oxidized).
Here, Oxygen (-1) disproportionates into Oxygen (-2) and Oxygen (0).

Example 3: Disproportionation of Copper(I) Ion
Copper(I) compounds are often unstable in aqueous solutions and tend to disproportionate.
2Cu+(aq) → Cu2+(aq) + Cu(s)

Let's analyze the oxidation states of Copper:
* Cu+: Oxidation state +1.
* Cu2+: Oxidation state +2 (oxidized).
* Cu(s): Oxidation state 0 (reduced).
Here, Copper (+1) disproportionates into Copper (+2) and Copper (0).

JEE Relevance: This reaction explains why Cu+ salts are less common or unstable in aqueous solutions compared to Cu2+ salts. You might be asked to predict the stability of Cu+ in solution.

Example 4: Disproportionation of Sulfur in Alkaline Medium
Elemental sulfur (S8, oxidation state 0) can disproportionate in hot, concentrated alkali.
3S8(s) + 24OH-(aq) → 4S2-(aq) + 2S2O3^2-(aq) + 12H2O(l)

Let's analyze the oxidation states of Sulfur:
* S8: Oxidation state 0.
* S2- (Sulfide ion): Sulfur is -2 (reduced).
* S2O3^2- (Thiosulfate ion): The average oxidation state of sulfur is +2. (The two sulfur atoms are in different environments, but the overall change from 0 to an average of +2 represents oxidation).
Here, Sulfur (0) disproportionates into Sulfur (-2) and Sulfur (+2).

Example 5: Disproportionation of Hypophosphorous Acid (H3PO2)
This is an example from the phosphorus chemistry, often seen in advanced problems.
3H3PO2(aq) → 2H3PO3(aq) + PH3(g)

Let's analyze the oxidation states of Phosphorus:
* H3PO2 (Hypophosphorous acid): Phosphorus is +1.
* H3PO3 (Phosphorous acid): Phosphorus is +3 (oxidized).
* PH3 (Phosphine): Phosphorus is -3 (reduced).
Here, Phosphorus (+1) disproportionates into Phosphorus (+3) and Phosphorus (-3).

Balancing Disproportionation Reactions (JEE Focus):
Disproportionation reactions are balanced using the same ion-electron method (half-reaction method) as other complex redox reactions. You essentially write two half-reactions for the same species: one for oxidation and one for reduction, then combine them.

Consider the disproportionation of Cl2 in cold dilute NaOH:
1. Identify the element undergoing disproportionation: Chlorine (Cl)
2. Write the two half-reactions:
* Oxidation half-reaction: Cl2 → ClO- (Cl from 0 to +1)
Cl2 + 2H2O → 2ClO- + 4H+ + 2e-
* Reduction half-reaction: Cl2 → Cl- (Cl from 0 to -1)
Cl2 + 2e- → 2Cl-
3. Balance electrons, add half-reactions, and balance for medium (basic):
Combining the two: 2Cl2 + 2H2O → 2Cl- + 2ClO- + 4H+
To balance H+ in basic medium, add 4OH- to both sides:
2Cl2 + 2H2O + 4OH- → 2Cl- + 2ClO- + 4H+ + 4OH-
2Cl2 + 2H2O + 4OH- → 2Cl- + 2ClO- + 4H2O
Simplifying:
Cl2 + 2OH- → Cl- + ClO- + H2O (multiplying by 1/2 to get integer coefficients)

#### Conclusion: CBSE vs. JEE Focus

* CBSE/Board Level: You need to define both types, identify them, and write simple balanced equations. Understanding the reactivity series for displacement is key.
* JEE Main & Advanced: Beyond definitions, the focus shifts to:
* Predicting spontaneity of displacement reactions using standard electrode potentials (E° values).
* Identifying if a given reaction is a disproportionation reaction.
* Predicting products of disproportionation, especially those influenced by pH (like halogens).
* Balancing complex disproportionation reactions using the ion-electron method in both acidic and basic media.
* Understanding the stability of compounds that undergo disproportionation (e.g., Cu+, H2O2).

Both displacement and disproportionation reactions are fundamental to understanding redox chemistry and electrochemistry, forming the backbone for many advanced concepts. Keep practicing identifying and balancing these reactions, and you'll master this crucial topic!
🎯 Shortcuts

Mastering redox reactions, including displacement and disproportionation, is crucial for both JEE Main and board exams. These concepts often involve recalling reactivity orders or specific conditions. Here are some effective mnemonics and shortcuts to help you remember key aspects.



I. Mnemonics for Displacement Reactions


Displacement reactions involve a more reactive element displacing a less reactive one from its compound. Remembering the reactivity series is key.





  1. Metal Reactivity Series (Displacement of H from acids/water and other metals from salts):

    This series dictates which metal can displace another. A metal higher in the series can displace any metal below it from its salt solution.




    • Mnemonic: "Kedar Nath Ca Mali Aloo Zara Feeke Pakata Hai, Cu Hg Ag Au Pt."


    • Corresponds to:

      • K (Potassium)

      • Na (Sodium)

      • Ca (Calcium)

      • Mg (Magnesium)

      • Al (Aluminium)

      • Zn (Zinc)

      • Fe (Iron)

      • Pb (Lead)

      • H (Hydrogen – reference point for displacing from acids)

      • Cu (Copper)

      • Hg (Mercury)

      • Ag (Silver)

      • Au (Gold)

      • Pt (Platinum)




    • JEE Tip: Metals above Hydrogen in the series react with dilute acids to produce H2 gas. Metals above Fe can also displace H from steam.




  2. Non-metal Reactivity Series (Halogens - Displacement of other halogens from halides):

    Halogens follow a similar displacement rule. A more reactive halogen displaces a less reactive one from its halide salt solution.




    • Mnemonic: "Fat Cats Bite Infants"


    • Corresponds to:

      • F (Fluorine - Most reactive)

      • Cl (Chlorine)

      • Br (Bromine)

      • I (Iodine - Least reactive)




    • JEE Tip: This order is based on their oxidizing power. F2 can displace Cl-, Br-, I-. Cl2 can displace Br-, I- (but not F-), and so on.





II. Shortcuts for Disproportionation Reactions


A disproportionation reaction is a type of redox reaction where a single element in a single compound is simultaneously oxidized and reduced.





  • Shortcut for Identification: "Intermediate O.S. is the Key!"

    An element can undergo disproportionation only if it exists in at least three different oxidation states (a lower, an intermediate, and a higher one). The element must be in its intermediate oxidation state in the reactant for disproportionation to occur.



    • The intermediate oxidation state can *decrease* (reduction) and *increase* (oxidation) in the same reaction.




  • Common Examples (Elements to Watch For):

    • Halogens (Cl, Br, I): Often disproportionate in alkaline media when in intermediate oxidation states (e.g., Cl in ClO-, ClO2-, ClO3-).

    • Phosphorus (P4): Disproportionates in hot concentrated NaOH solution to PH3 (reduction, -3 O.S.) and NaH2PO2 (oxidation, +1 O.S.).

    • Sulfur (S8): Disproportionates in hot concentrated NaOH solution to Na2S (reduction, -2 O.S.) and Na2S2O3 (oxidation, +2 O.S.).

    • Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2): Oxygen is in -1 O.S. (intermediate) and disproportionates to O2 (0 O.S. - oxidation) and H2O (-2 O.S. - reduction).




  • Warning for JEE: Elements in their highest or lowest possible oxidation states cannot disproportionate.

    • E.g., KMnO4 (Mn is +7, highest) cannot disproportionate.

    • E.g., F2 (F is 0, but only -1 is possible, so it only oxidizes).

    • E.g., HCl (Cl is -1, lowest) cannot disproportionate (it can only be oxidized).





Stay sharp with these mental tools, and you'll find tackling redox problems much easier!

💡 Quick Tips

Welcome to the "Quick Tips" section! Here, we'll focus on essential pointers for mastering displacement and disproportionation reactions, crucial for both JEE Main and board exams.



Displacement Reactions - Quick Tips


Displacement reactions involve an atom or ion in a compound being replaced by an atom or ion of another element. The key is relative reactivity.



  • Reactivity Series is Key: For metal-metal ion displacement, a more reactive metal will displace a less reactive metal from its salt solution.

    • JEE Tip: Link reactivity directly to standard electrode potentials (E°). A metal with a more negative (or less positive) E° (stronger reducing agent) will displace a metal with a less negative (or more positive) E° from its solution.

    • Example: Zn(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → ZnSO₄(aq) + Cu(s) because E°(Zn²⁺/Zn) < E°(Cu²⁺/Cu).



  • Halogen Displacement: For non-metal-non-metal ion displacement (especially halogens), a more electronegative (more reactive) halogen will displace a less electronegative (less reactive) halogen from its salt solution.

    • Reactivity Order: F₂ > Cl₂ > Br₂ > I₂.

    • JEE Tip: This also relates to E° values; a halogen with a more positive E° (stronger oxidizing agent) will displace one with a less positive E°.

    • Example: Cl₂(aq) + 2KBr(aq) → 2KCl(aq) + Br₂(aq).



  • Oxidation State Change: In all displacement reactions, the displacing element undergoes oxidation (acts as reducing agent), and the displaced element undergoes reduction (the ion acts as oxidizing agent). Always assign oxidation states to confirm.

  • Predicting Feasibility: Use the Electrochemical Series (Reactivity Series) to quickly predict if a reaction will occur spontaneously. If the displacing element is higher in the reactivity series (or has a more negative E° as a reducing agent) than the element to be displaced, the reaction is feasible.



Disproportionation Reactions - Quick Tips


Disproportionation is a special type of redox reaction where a single element in a specific oxidation state is simultaneously oxidized and reduced.



  • Same Element, Different States: The defining characteristic is that the same element is present in the reactant, and in two different oxidation states in the products (one higher, one lower).

  • Intermediate Oxidation State: Look for an element in an intermediate oxidation state. It must have the possibility to be both oxidized to a higher state and reduced to a lower state.

    • Example: In H₂O₂, oxygen is in -1 oxidation state (intermediate). It can be oxidized to O₂ (0) and reduced to H₂O (-2).

    • 2H₂O₂(aq) → 2H₂O(l) + O₂(g)



  • Common Examples:

    • Halogens (Cl₂, Br₂, I₂) in alkaline medium: Cl₂ → Cl⁻ and ClO⁻ (cold dilute) or ClO₃⁻ (hot concentrated).

    • Phosphorus (P₄) in hot, concentrated alkali: P₄ → PH₃ and H₂PO₂⁻.

    • Sulfur (S₈) in hot, concentrated alkali: S₈ → S²⁻ and S₂O₃²⁻.

    • Nitrous acid (HNO₂) or its salts: NO₂⁻ can disproportionate to NO₃⁻ and NO (or N₂O₃).



  • pH Dependence: Many disproportionation reactions are highly pH-dependent. For instance, halogens disproportionate in alkaline media but are stable in acidic media (except F₂ which always oxidizes). JEE Focus: Pay close attention to the reaction conditions (acidic/basic) as they dictate the products.

  • Balancing: Practice balancing disproportionation reactions using the oxidation number method or ion-electron method. This is a common exam question.



By keeping these quick tips in mind, you can efficiently analyze and solve problems related to displacement and disproportionation reactions in your exams!

🧠 Intuitive Understanding

Intuitive Understanding: Displacement and Disproportionation Reactions



Understanding redox reactions doesn't always require complex calculations; often, an intuitive grasp of electron transfer is key. This section provides just that for displacement and disproportionation reactions.

1. Displacement Reactions: The "Stronger Takes Over" Principle



Imagine a scenario where a more capable individual replaces a less capable one from a position. This is the essence of a displacement reaction in chemistry.

* The Core Idea: A more reactive element (which has a greater tendency to lose electrons, i.e., get oxidized) displaces a less reactive element from its compound (usually an aqueous solution of its salt).
* Electron Perspective: The more reactive element *donates* its electrons to the ions of the less reactive element.
* The more reactive element itself gets oxidized (loses electrons).
* The ions of the less reactive element get reduced (gain electrons) and form the neutral element.
* Analogy: Think of a game of "musical chairs" but with reactivity. The "stronger" or "more eager" element (higher reactivity) pushes the "weaker" element (lower reactivity) out of its compound.
* JEE Focus: This concept is directly linked to the Electrochemical Series (Reactivity Series). Elements higher in the series are stronger reducing agents and can displace those below them. For metals, look at their tendency to lose electrons; for non-metals, look at their tendency to gain electrons.

Example: When a zinc metal strip is dipped into a copper sulfate solution:
Zn(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → ZnSO₄(aq) + Cu(s)
Here, zinc (Zn) is more reactive than copper (Cu).
* Zn (oxidation state 0) loses electrons to become Zn²⁺ (oxidation state +2) – Oxidation.
* Cu²⁺ (oxidation state +2) gains electrons from Zn to become Cu (oxidation state 0) – Reduction.
The more reactive Zn literally "displaces" Cu from its salt solution.

2. Disproportionation Reactions: The "Split Personality" Redox



Disproportionation reactions are a fascinating class where a single element, in a specific oxidation state, decides to "split" its fate – some atoms of that element get oxidized, while others get reduced.

* The Core Idea: An element in an intermediate oxidation state simultaneously undergoes both oxidation and reduction to form products where it exists in both higher and lower oxidation states. It's like one entity playing both offense and defense.
* Electron Perspective: Some atoms of the element *lose* electrons (oxidized), and some *gain* electrons (reduced), all originating from the same reactant molecule.
* Analogy: Imagine a group of identical twins. Some twins decide to put on weight, while others decide to lose weight. They all started from the same initial weight, but ended up in different states.
* JEE Focus: To identify disproportionation, look for an element that is in an intermediate oxidation state in the reactant and then appears in at least two different oxidation states (one higher, one lower) in the products. This requires the element to have at least three possible stable oxidation states.

Example: Decomposition of hydrogen peroxide:
2H₂O₂(aq) → 2H₂O(l) + O₂(g)
Here, oxygen in H₂O₂ is in the -1 oxidation state (an intermediate state between 0 and -2).
* Some oxygen atoms in H₂O₂ go from -1 to -2 in H₂O – Reduction.
* Other oxygen atoms in H₂O₂ go from -1 to 0 in O₂ – Oxidation.
The same element (Oxygen) from the same reactant (H₂O₂) is both oxidized and reduced.

By grasping these intuitive principles, you can quickly identify and understand the fundamental electron movements in these crucial types of redox reactions, which is essential for both CBSE and JEE exams.
🌍 Real World Applications

Real-World Applications of Displacement and Disproportionation Reactions


Understanding redox reactions like displacement and disproportionation isn't just theoretical; these processes underpin countless phenomena in nature, industry, and daily life. Recognizing these applications provides a practical context to the concepts learned.



1. Real-World Applications of Displacement Reactions


Displacement reactions, where a more reactive element displaces a less reactive one from its compound, are fundamental to various industrial processes and natural phenomena. These are crucial for both JEE and CBSE contexts, especially regarding reactivity series.




  • Metal Extraction and Purification:

    • Hydrometallurgy: A classic example is the extraction of copper. Iron is more reactive than copper. When scrap iron is added to a copper sulfate solution, iron displaces copper:

      Fe(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → FeSO₄(aq) + Cu(s). This method is used to recover copper from low-grade ores or waste solutions.

    • Silver Recovery: Zinc dust can be used to recover silver from photographic solutions containing silver ions:

      Zn(s) + 2AgNO₃(aq) → Zn(NO₃)₂(aq) + 2Ag(s).




  • Corrosion Prevention (Sacrificial Protection/Galvanization):

    • Galvanization: Iron structures are often coated with a layer of zinc. Zinc is more reactive than iron, so if the coating is scratched and both metals are exposed to air and moisture, zinc will preferentially oxidize (corrode) instead of iron, thus protecting the iron. This is a crucial concept for both JEE and CBSE.

    • Cathodic Protection: Large steel structures like pipelines or ship hulls are often protected by connecting them to a more reactive metal (e.g., magnesium or zinc) which acts as a sacrificial anode, corroding in preference to the steel.




  • Batteries (Primary Cells): The operation of many non-rechargeable batteries (like some alkaline batteries) involves a displacement reaction, where a more reactive metal (e.g., zinc anode) displaces hydrogen ions or metal ions of the cathode material.



2. Real-World Applications of Disproportionation Reactions


Disproportionation reactions, where a single element in a compound simultaneously undergoes both oxidation and reduction, are less intuitive but equally prevalent in real-world scenarios. This concept is particularly important for JEE advanced and more challenging CBSE problems.




  • Bleaching Agents:

    • Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂): A common antiseptic and bleaching agent, hydrogen peroxide disproportionates into water and oxygen. The nascent oxygen released is responsible for its bleaching and antiseptic properties:

      2H₂O₂(aq) → 2H₂O(l) + O₂(g). Here, oxygen in H₂O₂ (oxidation state -1) is reduced to oxygen in H₂O (-2) and oxidized to oxygen in O₂ (0). This reaction is often catalyzed by light or certain enzymes (like catalase in biological systems).




  • Water Disinfection:

    • Chlorine Treatment: When chlorine gas is dissolved in water for disinfection, it disproportionates to form hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and hydrochloric acid (HCl). Hypochlorous acid is a powerful oxidizing agent and the primary active disinfectant that kills bacteria and viruses:

      Cl₂(g) + H₂O(l) → HOCl(aq) + HCl(aq). Here, chlorine (oxidation state 0) is reduced to chlorine in HCl (-1) and oxidized to chlorine in HOCl (+1).




  • Biological Systems:

    • Enzymatic Protection: Enzymes like catalase in living organisms protect cells from oxidative damage by disproportionating harmful hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen. This is a vital biochemical process.




JEE Tip: For both types of reactions, be prepared to identify the oxidizing and reducing agents, write balanced chemical equations, and calculate oxidation states. Real-world examples often appear in comprehension or application-based questions.

🔄 Common Analogies

Analogies can be powerful tools to understand complex chemical processes by relating them to everyday scenarios. For displacement and disproportionation reactions, these analogies help clarify the underlying principles of electron transfer.



1. Displacement Reactions: The 'Stronger Friend' Analogy


Imagine a scenario where three friends are together: Friend A, Friend B, and Friend C. Friend B and Friend C are a pair (e.g., dancing partners, a team for a game). Now, Friend A is much stronger or more assertive than Friend B.



  • The Analogy: Friend A (the more reactive element) walks up and, because they are stronger, takes Friend B's (the less reactive element) place with Friend C (the anion/compound partner). Friend B is then left alone, displaced from their partner.

  • Chemical Correlation: In a displacement reaction, a more reactive element replaces a less reactive element from its compound. The more reactive element essentially "steals" the partner (anion) from the less reactive one.

  • Example: When zinc metal (Zn) is added to a copper sulfate (CuSO₄) solution.


    • Zn (Friend A - stronger, more reactive)

    • Cu (Friend B - weaker, less reactive)

    • SO₄²⁻ (Friend C - the partner)


  • Reaction: Zn(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → ZnSO₄(aq) + Cu(s)

  • Explanation: Zinc is more reactive than copper. It displaces copper from copper sulfate, forming zinc sulfate, and copper metal is set free. Here, Zn is oxidized, and Cu²⁺ is reduced.


JEE Tip: This analogy helps visualize the reactivity series. Elements higher in the series can displace those lower in the series from their salt solutions. Remember the activity series of metals (K > Na > Ca > Mg > Al > Zn > Fe > Pb > H > Cu > Ag > Au) to predict displacement reactions.



2. Disproportionation Reactions: The 'Split Personality' Analogy


Consider a single individual who, at different times or in different situations, exhibits two completely opposite behaviors or characteristics. They are simultaneously the "giver" and the "taker," or the "builder" and the "destroyer," using their *own* resources.



  • The Analogy: A single species (the reactant molecule or ion) acts as both the oxidizing agent and the reducing agent *to itself*. This means some atoms of that species get oxidized (increase in oxidation state), while other identical atoms within the same species get reduced (decrease in oxidation state).

  • Chemical Correlation: The key here is that the *same element* in a single reactant species undergoes both oxidation and reduction, leading to products where its oxidation state is both higher and lower than its initial state.

  • Example: The decomposition of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂).


    • H₂O₂ (the species with the 'split personality' - Oxygen has an oxidation state of -1)

    • One part of O in H₂O₂ (behaves like a 'taker' - reduced to O in H₂O, oxidation state -2)

    • Another part of O in H₂O₂ (behaves like a 'giver' - oxidized to O in O₂, oxidation state 0)


  • Reaction: 2H₂O₂(aq) → 2H₂O(l) + O₂(g)

  • Explanation: The oxygen in hydrogen peroxide has an oxidation state of -1. In water (H₂O), oxygen has an oxidation state of -2 (reduction), and in oxygen gas (O₂), oxygen has an oxidation state of 0 (oxidation). The same element (Oxygen) from the same compound (H₂O₂) is simultaneously oxidized and reduced.


JEE Tip: Disproportionation reactions typically involve an element that can exist in at least three different oxidation states, and the reactant is in an intermediate oxidation state. Common examples include halogens (Cl₂, Br₂, I₂ in alkaline medium), phosphorus, sulfur, and hydrogen peroxide.


These analogies provide a simplified mental model to grasp the core ideas of how electrons are transferred in these specific redox reactions, making them easier to recall and apply in problem-solving.

📋 Prerequisites

To effectively grasp Displacement and Disproportionation Reactions, a solid foundation in core redox concepts is essential. These reactions are specific types of redox reactions, and understanding their mechanisms requires proficiency in identifying oxidation state changes and the roles of various species.



Here are the fundamental concepts you should be comfortable with before delving into displacement and disproportionation reactions:




  • 1. Basic Definitions of Oxidation and Reduction:

    • Oxidation: Loss of electrons, increase in oxidation number, addition of oxygen, removal of hydrogen.

    • Reduction: Gain of electrons, decrease in oxidation number, removal of oxygen, addition of hydrogen.

    • JEE/CBSE Focus: For displacement and disproportionation reactions, the definitions based on change in oxidation number and electron transfer are paramount.



  • 2. Rules for Assigning Oxidation Numbers:

    • This is arguably the most critical prerequisite. You must be able to correctly assign oxidation numbers to elements in compounds and ions. This includes:

      • Elements in their elemental state (O.N. = 0).

      • Group 1 metals (+1), Group 2 metals (+2).

      • Fluorine (-1), Hydrogen (+1 generally, -1 in metal hydrides).

      • Oxygen (-2 generally, -1 in peroxides, -1/2 in superoxides, +2 in OF2).

      • Sum of O.N. in a neutral compound = 0.

      • Sum of O.N. in a polyatomic ion = charge on the ion.



    • JEE/CBSE Focus: Proficiency in assigning oxidation numbers accurately is tested directly and indirectly. It's the first step in identifying any redox reaction, including displacement and disproportionation.



  • 3. Identification of Oxidizing and Reducing Agents:

    • Oxidizing Agent (Oxidant): The species that causes oxidation by getting itself reduced (gains electrons, decreases O.N.).

    • Reducing Agent (Reductant): The species that causes reduction by getting itself oxidized (loses electrons, increases O.N.).

    • JEE/CBSE Focus: Understanding these roles is essential for classifying species involved in the reaction and predicting product formation, especially in displacement reactions.



  • 4. Reactivity Series of Metals (Activity Series):

    • For displacement reactions involving metals, knowing the relative reactivity of metals is crucial. A more reactive metal displaces a less reactive metal from its salt solution.

    • Common series: K > Na > Ca > Mg > Al > Zn > Fe > Pb > H > Cu > Ag > Au > Pt. (More reactive metals are higher up and can displace those below them).

    • JEE/CBSE Focus: Questions often involve predicting whether a displacement reaction will occur based on the activity series.



  • 5. Reactivity of Halogens:

    • Similar to metals, halogens also have a reactivity order: F2 > Cl2 > Br2 > I2. A more reactive halogen displaces a less reactive halide ion from its solution.

    • JEE/CBSE Focus: This concept is vital for predicting halogen displacement reactions.





Mastering these prerequisites will provide a strong foundation, making the complex nuances of displacement and disproportionation reactions much easier to understand and apply in problem-solving.

⚠️ Common Exam Traps

⚠ Common Exam Traps in Displacement & Disproportionation Reactions ⚠


This section highlights typical errors and misconceptions students face concerning displacement and disproportionation reactions in competitive exams like JEE Main and board exams. Being aware of these traps can significantly improve accuracy.



1. Traps in Displacement Reactions




  • Incorrect Reactivity Series Application:

    • Many students misremember or misapply the electrochemical series (activity series). For metals, a more reactive metal displaces a less reactive metal from its salt solution. Trap: Forgetting this order or applying it incorrectly. E.g., Gold cannot displace copper from CuSO₄.

    • For halogens (non-metals), the order of reactivity is F₂ > Cl₂ > Br₂ > I₂. A more reactive halogen displaces a less reactive halide ion from its solution. Trap: Confusing the order or thinking a less reactive halogen can displace a more reactive one (e.g., Br₂ displacing Cl⁻ from NaCl).




  • Ignoring Physical State:

    • Displacement reactions typically involve a more reactive element reacting with a compound of a less reactive element. Trap: Expecting two elemental forms to react (e.g., Fe + Cu → ? No reaction as both are in elemental form). The less reactive element must be part of a compound for displacement to occur.




  • Overlooking Redox Nature:

    • Displacement reactions are fundamentally redox reactions. One species is oxidized, and another is reduced. Trap: Not being able to assign oxidation states and confirm the redox nature, which is crucial for balancing equations (JEE).





2. Traps in Disproportionation Reactions




  • Misidentifying Intermediate Oxidation States:

    • The defining characteristic of a disproportionation reaction is that an element in an intermediate oxidation state simultaneously undergoes both oxidation and reduction. Trap: Trying to disproportionate an element already in its highest or lowest possible oxidation state. For example, S in H₂SO₄ (+6) or S in H₂S (-2) cannot disproportionate further. H₂O₂ (O is -1) is a classic example that can disproportionate to O₂ (0) and H₂O (-2).




  • Ignoring Reaction Medium:

    • The medium (acidic, basic, or neutral) often dictates whether disproportionation occurs and what products are formed, especially for halogens and sulfur. For example, Cl₂ disproportionates in basic medium but not readily in acidic medium. Trap: Not considering the given medium, leading to incorrect products or conclusions about reaction feasibility (JEE).




  • Confusing with Auto-oxidation/Reduction:

    • While disproportionation is a type of auto-oxidation/reduction, not all auto-oxidation/reduction is disproportionation (e.g., dimerization of free radicals). Trap: Broadly classifying any self-redox reaction as disproportionation without confirming the single element undergoing both changes.




  • Balancing Complexity:

    • Balancing disproportionation reactions, particularly in acidic or basic media, can be tricky due to the same element appearing in different oxidation states in the products. Trap: Errors in applying the ion-electron method or oxidation number method, especially in assigning coefficients to the disproportionating species and products.





📌 General Exam Advice:



  • Always determine oxidation states: This is the most crucial first step for any redox reaction.

  • Read the question carefully: Pay attention to keywords like "acidic medium," "basic medium," "reactivity order," etc.

  • Practice balancing: Master balancing redox equations, especially for disproportionation, as it's a common area for calculation errors.


Stay alert, practice diligently, and you'll overcome these common exam traps!


Key Takeaways
Here are the key takeaways for Displacement and Disproportionation Reactions:

Key Takeaways: Displacement and Disproportionation Reactions



Understanding displacement and disproportionation reactions is fundamental for redox chemistry, particularly for predicting reaction outcomes and balancing equations in JEE Main.



1. Displacement Reactions



  • Definition: A displacement reaction is a redox reaction where a more reactive element displaces a less reactive element from its compound.

  • Redox Nature:

    • The displacing element acts as a reducing agent (it gets oxidized, its oxidation state increases).

    • The displaced element (from its compound) acts as an oxidizing agent (it gets reduced, its oxidation state decreases).



  • Driving Force (JEE Focus):

    • Reactivity Series: For metals, a metal higher in the activity series (more electropositive, lower standard reduction potential E°red) will displace a metal lower in the series (less electropositive, higher E°red) from its salt solution.

    • Standard Electrode Potentials: A reaction is spontaneous if the standard cell potential (E°cell = E°cathode - E°anode) is positive. For displacement, the element that gets oxidized should have a more negative (or less positive) standard reduction potential than the element that gets reduced.



  • Types: Can be metal-metal, metal-hydrogen, metal-nonmetal, or nonmetal-nonmetal displacements.

  • Example: Zinc displaces copper from copper sulfate solution.

    Zn(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → ZnSO₄(aq) + Cu(s)

    Here, Zn (oxidation state 0) is oxidized to Zn²⁺ (+2), and Cu²⁺ (+2) is reduced to Cu (0). Zn is more reactive than Cu.



2. Disproportionation Reactions



  • Definition: A disproportionation reaction is a specific type of redox reaction in which the same element in a single reactant is simultaneously oxidized and reduced.

  • Key Condition: The element undergoing disproportionation must exist in at least three different stable oxidation states. Its initial oxidation state in the reactant must be an intermediate oxidation state between the two final oxidation states it attains in the products.

  • Characteristic Feature: A single reactant molecule contains the element that shows both an increase and a decrease in its oxidation state.

  • Common Examples:

    • Halogens in basic medium: For example, chlorine gas in cold dilute NaOH.

      Cl₂(g) + 2OH⁻(aq) → Cl⁻(aq) + ClO⁻(aq) + H₂O(l)

      Here, Chlorine (oxidation state 0) is oxidized to ClO⁻ (+1) and reduced to Cl⁻ (-1).

    • Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂):

      2H₂O₂(aq) → 2H₂O(l) + O₂(g)

      Oxygen in H₂O₂ (oxidation state -1) is reduced to H₂O (-2) and oxidized to O₂ (0).

    • Certain compounds of sulfur, phosphorus, and nitrogen in intermediate oxidation states also undergo disproportionation.



  • JEE Tip: When identifying disproportionation, look for an element in the reactant that exists in an intermediate oxidation state and forms products where its oxidation state is both higher and lower than its initial state. Balancing such reactions, especially in acidic or basic media, is a common exam question.



3. Distinction & Exam Relevance



  • The main difference is that disproportionation involves self-oxidation and self-reduction of a single element within the same compound, whereas displacement involves an external element driving the redox process.

  • For exams, be prepared to:

    • Identify both reaction types based on changes in oxidation states.

    • Predict the feasibility of displacement reactions using reactivity series or standard electrode potentials.

    • Balance disproportionation reactions using the ion-electron method (half-reaction method) in acidic or basic conditions.



🧩 Problem Solving Approach
This section outlines a systematic approach to tackle problems involving displacement and disproportionation reactions, critical for both board exams and JEE. Mastering these steps will ensure accuracy in identifying reaction types, predicting products, and balancing equations.

Problem Solving Approach: Displacement Reactions


Displacement reactions typically involve a more reactive element displacing a less reactive element from its compound.



  1. Identify Reactants: Look for an elemental substance (e.g., Zn, Cl₂, F₂) reacting with a compound containing a similar type of element (e.g., CuSO₄, NaI).


  2. Check Reactivity:


    • For Metals: Refer to the activity series (or electrochemical series based on standard reduction potentials). A metal higher in the activity series (more negative standard reduction potential) can displace a metal lower in the series (less negative/more positive standard reduction potential) from its salt solution.


      JEE Tip: For JEE, a deeper understanding of standard electrode potentials (E°) is crucial. A spontaneous redox reaction occurs if E°cell > 0.


    • For Non-metals (Halogens): The reactivity order for halogens is F₂ > Cl₂ > Br₂ > I₂. A more reactive halogen displaces a less reactive halogen from its halide solution.




  3. Assign Oxidation States: Determine the oxidation states of all elements in the reactants and predict their potential changes in products. This confirms if it's a redox reaction where one element is oxidized and another is reduced.


  4. Predict Products: Form the new compound with the displacing element and release the displaced element in its elemental form.


    Example: Zn(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → ZnSO₄(aq) + Cu(s)


  5. Balance the Equation: Use either the oxidation number method or the ion-electron method to balance the redox equation.



Problem Solving Approach: Disproportionation Reactions


Disproportionation is a special type of redox reaction where a single element in an intermediate oxidation state simultaneously undergoes both oxidation and reduction.



  1. Identify the Key Element: Look for a reactant where a single element exists in an intermediate oxidation state. This means it can be both oxidized to a higher oxidation state and reduced to a lower oxidation state.


    Common Examples: P₄, S₈, Cl₂, Br₂, I₂, H₂O₂, and various oxyacids/oxyions (e.g., HClO₂, H₃PO₃, MnO₄²⁻).


  2. Verify Multiple Oxidation States: Confirm that the identified element can indeed exist in at least three oxidation states: the initial intermediate state, a higher state, and a lower state.


  3. Assign Oxidation States: Clearly write down the oxidation state of the potential disproportionating element in the reactant.


  4. Predict Products: The element in question will form at least two different products: one where its oxidation state is higher (oxidized product) and another where its oxidation state is lower (reduced product).


  5. Consider Medium: The products of disproportionation reactions, especially for halogens and some oxyanions, can be highly dependent on the reaction medium (acidic, basic, or neutral). Always note the medium specified in the problem.


    Example: Cl₂ in basic medium gives Cl⁻ and ClO₃⁻, while in neutral/acidic medium, it might not disproportionate or give different products.


  6. Balance the Equation: This is often the most challenging part for disproportionation. Use the ion-electron method (half-reaction method) carefully, as the same element is involved in both oxidation and reduction half-reactions.

    • Separate into oxidation and reduction half-reactions for the *same* element.

    • Balance atoms (except O and H).

    • Balance O using H₂O.

    • Balance H using H⁺ (acidic) or H₂O and OH⁻ (basic).

    • Balance charge using electrons.

    • Equalize electrons and combine the half-reactions.





Important Note: For both types of reactions, a strong grasp of assigning oxidation states and balancing redox equations (both oxidation number and ion-electron methods) is fundamental. Practice is key!

📝 CBSE Focus Areas

Welcome, future chemists! This section focuses on the key aspects of Displacement and Disproportionation Reactions that are particularly relevant for your CBSE Board examinations.



1. Displacement Reactions (CBSE Focus)


In a displacement reaction, a more reactive element displaces a less reactive element from its compound. For CBSE, understanding the reactivity trends is crucial.



  • Metal Displacement: A more reactive metal displaces a less reactive metal from its salt solution. The key here is the Reactivity Series of Metals (K > Na > Ca > Mg > Al > Zn > Fe > Ni > Sn > Pb > H > Cu > Ag > Au).

    • Example: Zinc is more reactive than copper. When a zinc rod is placed in copper sulphate solution, zinc displaces copper.
      Zn(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → ZnSO₄(aq) + Cu(s)

      Here, Zn is oxidized (0 to +2), and Cu²⁺ is reduced (+2 to 0). Zn acts as the reducing agent, and CuSO₄ as the oxidizing agent.



  • Non-metal Displacement (Halogens): A more reactive halogen displaces a less reactive halogen from its halide solution. The reactivity order for halogens is F₂ > Cl₂ > Br₂ > I₂.

    • Example: Chlorine gas bubbled through a potassium bromide solution displaces bromine.
      Cl₂(g) + 2KBr(aq) → 2KCl(aq) + Br₂(aq)

      Here, Cl₂ is reduced (0 to -1), and Br⁻ is oxidized (-1 to 0). Cl₂ acts as the oxidizing agent, and KBr as the reducing agent.



  • Key for CBSE: You should be able to:

    • Predict whether a displacement reaction will occur based on the reactivity series.

    • Identify the species getting oxidized and reduced.

    • Identify the oxidizing and reducing agents.

    • Write simple balanced chemical equations for these reactions.





2. Disproportionation Reactions (CBSE Focus)


A disproportionation reaction is a special type of redox reaction where the same element simultaneously undergoes both oxidation and reduction. This means the element must be in an intermediate oxidation state.



  • Characteristic Feature: An element in one reactant molecule/ion shows an increase in its oxidation state (oxidation) and a decrease in its oxidation state (reduction) in the products.

  • Common Examples for CBSE:

    • Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂): Oxygen in H₂O₂ is in the -1 oxidation state. It disproportionates into O₂ (0 oxidation state, oxidation) and H₂O (-2 oxidation state, reduction).
      2H₂O₂(aq) → 2H₂O(l) + O₂(g)


    • Halogens in Alkaline Medium: Chlorine, Bromine, and Iodine disproportionate in alkaline (basic) solutions. For example, chlorine in cold, dilute NaOH:
      Cl₂(g) + 2NaOH(aq) → NaCl(aq) + NaClO(aq) + H₂O(l)

      Here, Chlorine (0) is reduced to Cl⁻ (-1) and oxidized to ClO⁻ (+1).

    • Phosphorus (P₄) and Sulfur (S₈): These elements also undergo disproportionation in basic medium.



  • Key for CBSE: You should be able to:

    • Define disproportionation reaction with suitable examples.

    • Identify elements that undergo disproportionation (look for intermediate oxidation states).

    • Write and sometimes balance (simpler ones) equations for common disproportionation reactions.





CBSE Exam Tip!


For both types of reactions, pay close attention to the change in oxidation states. This is your primary tool for identifying whether a reaction is redox, and specifically if it's a displacement or disproportionation reaction. Practice identifying the oxidizing and reducing agents. For disproportionation, always look for the same element appearing in different oxidation states on the product side.


Keep practicing, and you'll master these concepts!

🎓 JEE Focus Areas

Mastering displacement and disproportionation reactions is crucial for acing redox chemistry questions in JEE Main. These reaction types frequently appear in questions related to spontaneity, product prediction, and balancing redox equations.



Displacement Reactions: Predicting Spontaneity and Products


Displacement reactions involve one element displacing another from a compound. For JEE, the focus is often on predicting whether a reaction will occur and identifying the products.



  • Metal Displacement Reactions: A more reactive metal displaces a less reactive metal from its salt solution. The reactivity is determined by their standard electrode potentials (electrochemical series).

    • JEE Focus: Remember that a metal higher in the electrochemical series (more negative standard reduction potential, stronger reducing agent) will displace a metal lower in the series (more positive standard reduction potential, weaker reducing agent).

    • Example: Zn(s) + CuSO₄(aq) → ZnSO₄(aq) + Cu(s). Here, Zn (E°Zn²⁺/Zn = -0.76 V) is a stronger reducing agent than Cu (E°Cu²⁺/Cu = +0.34 V), hence it displaces Cu.



  • Non-metal Displacement Reactions: A more reactive non-metal displaces a less reactive non-metal from its salt solution. This is commonly seen with halogens.

    • JEE Focus: For halogens, reactivity decreases down the group (F₂ > Cl₂ > Br₂ > I₂). A halogen higher in the group will displace a halide ion of a halogen lower in the group.

    • Example: Cl₂(g) + 2KBr(aq) → 2KCl(aq) + Br₂(aq). Cl₂ is a stronger oxidizing agent than Br₂, hence it displaces Br⁻.



  • Hydrogen Displacement: Highly reactive metals (like Na, K, Ca) displace hydrogen from cold water. Less reactive metals (like Mg, Al, Zn, Fe) displace hydrogen from steam or acids. Very unreactive metals (like Cu, Ag, Au) cannot displace hydrogen.



Disproportionation Reactions: Identifying Oxidation States


A disproportionation reaction is a special type of redox reaction where the same element undergoes both oxidation and reduction. This means an element in an intermediate oxidation state changes to both a higher and a lower oxidation state.



  • JEE Focus: The key is to identify elements that can exist in at least three different oxidation states, and the reactant should be in an intermediate oxidation state.

  • Common Examples:

    • Halogens: Cl₂, Br₂, I₂ in alkaline medium. For example, Cl₂ + 2NaOH → NaCl + NaClO + H₂O (Cl goes from 0 to -1 and +1). In hot concentrated alkali, they can form +5 oxidation state products.

    • Hydrogen Peroxide: 2H₂O₂(aq) → 2H₂O(l) + O₂(g). Oxygen in H₂O₂ (oxidation state -1) changes to -2 in H₂O and 0 in O₂.

    • Phosphorus: P₄ in basic medium.

    • Sulfur: S in basic medium (forms S²⁻ and S₂O₃²⁻ or SO₃²⁻).



  • Identifying Disproportionation:

    1. Assign oxidation states to all elements in the reactant and products.

    2. If the same element's oxidation state increases in one product and decreases in another product, it's a disproportionation reaction.



  • Common Mistake (JEE): Confusing intramolecular redox (where different atoms in the same molecule are oxidized and reduced) with disproportionation. In disproportionation, it is strictly the same element.



Key JEE Strategy: Balancing Equations


For both reaction types, especially disproportionation, you must be proficient in balancing redox reactions using both the oxidation number method and the half-reaction (ion-electron) method in acidic and basic media. This is a recurring and high-scoring topic.



Stay sharp and practice identifying these reaction types, especially under different conditions. Good luck!

🌐 Overview
Displacement: a more reactive species (often more reducing) displaces a less reactive one from a compound (e.g., Zn + CuSO4 → ZnSO4 + Cu). Disproportionation: the same species is simultaneously oxidized and reduced (e.g., 2H2O2 → 2H2O + O2).
📚 Fundamentals
• Displacement: A + BX → AX + B if A is more reactive (more reducing or higher potential to displace B).
• Disproportionation: species X changes to forms with higher and lower oxidation numbers simultaneously.
🔬 Deep Dive
Thermodynamic criteria (ΔG, E°cell) for displacement; kinetic considerations; catalytic disproportionation (qualitative).
🎯 Shortcuts
“Displace if higher in series; Disproportionation = one splits both ways.”
💡 Quick Tips
• For halogens: F2 > Cl2 > Br2 > I2 reactivity (in displacement of halides).
• Check if disproportionation is forbidden by high/low oxidation state stability.
🧠 Intuitive Understanding
Displacement reflects relative tendencies to lose/gain electrons; disproportionation happens when a species can exist in multiple oxidation states and is unstable at an intermediate state.
🌍 Real World Applications
• Metal extraction and refining.
• Halogen displacement reactions in synthesis.
• Disproportionation in bleaching and disinfection (H2O2, Cl2).
🔄 Common Analogies
• Sports ranking: stronger team displaces a weaker team from a bracket. For disproportionation, one player plays both offense and defense in the same game.
📋 Prerequisites
Oxidation number rules, activity series/standard potentials, acid/base media identification.
⚠️ Common Exam Traps
• Ignoring the reaction medium (acidic vs basic).
• Misapplying activity series to complexed ions.
• Failing to check both mass and charge balance.
Key Takeaways
• Use series/potentials to predict direction.
• Balance with ion–electron method.
• Check mass and charge conservation.
🧩 Problem Solving Approach
1) Assign oxidation states.
2) Identify oxidation and reduction parts.
3) Balance half‑reactions with appropriate medium.
4) Combine and cancel electrons.
5) Validate with potentials/series for feasibility.
📝 CBSE Focus Areas
Examples of metal/halogen displacements; recognizing disproportionation and balancing equations.
🎓 JEE Focus Areas
Predicting feasibility with electrode potentials; complex disproportionation/comproportionation scenarios; medium‑dependent balancing.

No CBSE problems available yet.

No JEE problems available yet.

No videos available yet.

No images available yet.

📐Important Formulas (3)

Spontaneity Criterion (Displacement/Redox)
E^circ_{ ext{cell}} > 0 quad ext{or} quad Delta G^circ = -n F E^circ_{ ext{cell}} < 0
Text: Standard Cell Potential (E-naught cell) must be positive for a spontaneous reaction (like displacement). Standard Gibbs Free Energy change must be negative.
This is the fundamental thermodynamic criterion for any redox reaction, including displacement. If Metal A displaces Metal B, $E^circ_{ ext{cell}}$ must be positive, indicating A is a stronger reducing agent than B.
Variables: Determining the feasibility of any displacement reaction (e.g., metal dissolving in acid, or metal displacing another from salt). Used heavily in CBSE and JEE.
Calculation of Standard Cell Potential
E^circ_{ ext{cell}} = E^circ_{ ext{reduction (cathode)}} - E^circ_{ ext{reduction (anode)}}
Text: E-naught cell equals the standard reduction potential of the species undergoing reduction (cathode) minus the standard reduction potential of the species undergoing oxidation (anode).
Required to calculate the numerical value used in the Spontaneity Criterion. In a displacement reaction, the displacing species acts as the anode (oxidation).
Variables: Calculating the driving force (voltage) of a displacement reaction using standard reduction potentials provided in the Electrochemical Series.
Disproportionation Criterion (Stability Analysis)
E^circ_{1} + E^circ_{2} > 0 quad ext{for the net reaction}
Text: The sum of the standard potentials for the two half-reactions resulting in disproportionation must lead to a positive E-naught cell for spontaneity.
Disproportionation involves a species in an intermediate oxidation state (M) reacting with itself to form a higher state (M') and a lower state (M''). The reaction $2M o M' + M''$ must be spontaneous ($E^circ > 0$).
Variables: Determining if an intermediate oxidation state (e.g., $Cu^+$ or $MnO_4^{2-}$) is unstable and will undergo self-redox (disproportionation). High importance for JEE Advanced.

📚References & Further Reading (10)

Book
Chemistry Part I (NCERT Textbook for Class XII)
By: National Council of Educational Research and Training (NCERT)
http://ncert.nic.in/textbook/html/lech101.htm
Fundamental definitions and standard examples of redox reactions, including the basic concepts of displacement reactions (metal activity series) and basic examples of disproportionation (e.g., halogens in base).
Note: Essential foundational text for CBSE 12th and JEE Main aspirants. Covers all basic requirements for the topic.
Book
By:
Website
Electrochemical Series and Displacement Reactions
By: Chemistry LibreTexts
https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/General_Chemistry/Map:General_Chemistry_(Averill_and_Eldredge)/17:_Electrochemistry/17.02:_The_Activity_Series
Detailed explanation of the activity series (or electrochemical series) and its role in predicting the spontaneity and outcome of single displacement reactions, focusing on metal/ion interactions.
Note: Crucial for understanding the 'why' behind metal displacement reactions, connecting the topic directly to standard reduction potentials (key for JEE).
Website
By:
PDF
Competitive Exam Review: Disproportionation Reactions of Halogens
By: Resonance/FIITJEE Study Material (Example)
N/A
Focused guide specifically analyzing common disproportionation reactions found in entrance exams (e.g., P4, S8, Cl2, H2O2) under various pH conditions, including common exceptions and pitfalls.
Note: Extremely practical for JEE Main/Advanced, focusing on memorization of critical examples and typical exam-style questions regarding reaction conditions.
PDF
By:
Article
The Spontaneity of Metal Displacement Reactions in Aqueous Solution
By: R. C. Murray
N/A
Discusses the calculation of Gibbs free energy (ΔG) and standard cell potential (E°) to quantitatively predict the feasibility and driving force of single-replacement displacement reactions.
Note: Integrates electrochemistry and thermodynamics, essential for the quantitative analysis required in JEE Advanced problems involving reaction prediction.
Article
By:
Research_Paper
Displacement Chemistry and Materials Synthesis: Utilizing Redox Potential Gaps
By: Y. Sun, Y. Xia
N/A
Focuses on the practical application of galvanic displacement reactions (e.g., silver coating on copper) to synthesize nanostructures, linking fundamental redox principles to modern materials science.
Note: Excellent for providing context and real-world application of displacement reactions, motivating students and aiding in conceptual visualization (useful for application-based JEE questions).
Research_Paper
By:

⚠️Common Mistakes to Avoid (61)

Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

Confusing Standard Redox Reactions with Disproportionation (Intermediate O.S. Requirement)

Students frequently misidentify general intermolecular or intramolecular redox reactions as disproportionation reactions. The key mistake is failing to enforce the strict condition that the reactant species must contain the element in an intermediate oxidation state (O.S.) which simultaneously increases (oxidation) and decreases (reduction) its O.S. in the products.
💭 Why This Happens:
This error stems from an over-generalized definition. Students observe that a single element's oxidation state changes and immediately label it disproportionation, neglecting to check if the element acted as both the reducing and oxidizing agent from the same starting O.S..
✅ Correct Approach:
To confirm a disproportionation reaction, perform the following two checks:
  • Check 1: Does the element undergoing change exist in only one species on the reactant side?
  • Check 2: Is the initial O.S. of that element neither its maximum nor minimum possible O.S., allowing it the flexibility to move both up and down? (e.g., Chlorine starting at O.S. 0, which can go to -1 and +1).
📝 Examples:
❌ Wrong:
Classifying the decomposition of potassium chlorate ($2KClO_3
ightarrow 2KCl + 3O_2$) as disproportionation.

O.S. changes are Cl: +5 to -1 (Reduction) and O: -2 to 0 (Oxidation). Since two different elements are changing states, this is an Intramolecular Redox, not disproportionation.
✅ Correct:


























Reaction Element & Initial O.S. Product O.S. (Higher) Product O.S. (Lower) Classification
$3Cl_2 + 6NaOH
ightarrow 5NaCl + NaClO_3 + 3H_2O$
Cl: 0 Cl: +5 Cl: -1 Disproportionation
$MnO_4^- + 8H^+ + 5e^-
ightarrow Mn^{2+} + 4H_2O$
Mn: +7 N/A Mn: +2 Standard Reduction (No Disproportionation)
💡 Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: Always calculate the O.S. of the element in all species. If the element's initial O.S. is already the maximum (e.g., $N^{+5}$ in $HNO_3$) or minimum (e.g., $S^{-2}$ in $H_2S$), it cannot undergo disproportionation, though it can undergo redox.
CBSE_12th

No summary available yet.

No educational resource available yet.

Displacement reactions and disproportionation

Subject: Chemistry
Complexity: High
Syllabus: JEE_Main

Content Completeness: 33.3%

33.3%
📚 Explanations: 0
📝 CBSE Problems: 0
🎯 JEE Problems: 0
🎥 Videos: 0
🖼️ Images: 0
📐 Formulas: 3
📚 References: 10
⚠️ Mistakes: 61
🤖 AI Explanation: No