๐Ÿ“–Topic Explanations

๐ŸŒ Overview
Hello students! Welcome to the fascinating world of Intersection of lines! Every point has a story, and the intersection of lines tells us a crucial chapter in problem-solving.

Imagine you're trying to locate a specific spot on a map where two different roads cross, or pinpoint the exact moment two objects travelling along straight paths meet. This seemingly simple idea is the core of what we'll explore in "Intersection of lines." It's not just about drawing lines and seeing where they cross; it's about using the power of mathematics to precisely determine these points of contact, or to understand why they might never meet.

At its heart, the intersection of lines is about finding a common point that lies on two or more distinct lines. This fundamental concept is a cornerstone of Coordinate Geometry, providing the bedrock for understanding more complex geometrical relationships. You'll discover that when two lines interact, there are only three possibilities:

  • They intersect at a unique point (like two roads crossing).

  • They are parallel and never meet (like railway tracks).

  • They are coincident, meaning they are the exact same line, and thus share infinite common points.



Mastering this topic is absolutely vital for both your CBSE board exams and especially for the JEE Main. It forms the basis for solving systems of linear equations, understanding the geometry of various shapes, and is a prerequisite for tackling advanced concepts in 2D and 3D geometry, including the intersection of lines with planes, and lines in space. Questions involving this concept are frequently asked and can be real game-changers in competitive exams.

In this section, we will embark on a journey to understand how to mathematically determine these points of intersection. You'll learn the different methods to identify if lines intersect, how to calculate the coordinates of their intersection point when it exists, and how to distinguish between parallel and coincident lines. We'll explore algebraic approaches, delving into the nuances of solving simultaneous equations, and understand the geometric implications of each case.

Get ready to unlock the secrets behind every line's interaction and equip yourself with a powerful tool for precision and problem-solving in mathematics! This journey will sharpen your analytical skills and build a robust foundation for your future studies.
๐Ÿ“š Fundamentals
Hey there, future engineers and mathematicians! Welcome to a super important topic in coordinate geometry: the Intersection of Lines. You know how roads cross each other, or how the hands of a clock meet at certain times? That's exactly what we're going to talk about today, but with straight lines on a coordinate plane!

Imagine you're navigating a city using a map. You have two streets, and you want to find out where they cross. That crossing point is their intersection. In mathematics, when we talk about lines, their intersection is essentially the common point that lies on both lines simultaneously. Sounds simple, right? It is, but it's a foundational concept that unlocks a lot of advanced problems later on.




### What Does "Intersection" Really Mean Geometrically?

Let's start by visualizing. Draw two straight lines on a piece of paper.


  • Most of the time, they will cross at exactly one point. This unique point is their point of intersection.

  • Sometimes, the lines might run side-by-side forever, never touching. What do we call such lines? Yes, you got it โ€“ parallel lines. Do parallel lines intersect? No, never!

  • And what if the two lines are actually the exact same line, just drawn twice? They "intersect" at every single point because they are coincident. We call these coincident lines.



So, fundamentally, when we say "find the intersection of two lines," we are looking for the coordinates `(x, y)` of a point that satisfies the equations of *both* lines. It's like finding a treasure chest that's on *both* map routes at the same time!




### The Algebraic Connection: Equations of Lines

Remember the general form of a straight line equation? It's usually given as:

Ax + By + C = 0


where A, B, and C are constants, and x and y are the coordinates of any point on the line.

If a point `(xโ‚, yโ‚)` lies on this line, then substituting `xโ‚` for `x` and `yโ‚` for `y` into the equation will make the equation true. For example, if the line is `2x + 3y - 7 = 0`, and the point `(2, 1)` is on it, then `2(2) + 3(1) - 7 = 4 + 3 - 7 = 0`. Since `0 = 0`, the point `(2, 1)` indeed lies on the line.

Now, if a point `(x, y)` is the intersection of *two* lines, say:
Line 1: Aโ‚x + Bโ‚y + Cโ‚ = 0
Line 2: Aโ‚‚x + Bโ‚‚y + Cโ‚‚ = 0

...then this point `(x, y)` *must* satisfy both equations simultaneously. This is the key idea! Finding the point of intersection boils down to solving a system of two linear equations in two variables (`x` and `y`).




### How Do We Actually Find the Point of Intersection? (The Methods!)

There are primarily two algebraic methods we use to find the point of intersection, and you might have seen them before when solving simultaneous equations. Let's refresh our memory with some examples.

#### Method 1: The Substitution Method

This method involves solving one of the equations for one variable (say, `y` in terms of `x`), and then substituting that expression into the other equation.


  1. Step 1: Choose one of the two equations and solve it for one variable in terms of the other. For instance, express `y` as `y = mx + c` or `x` as `x = (By + C)/A`.

  2. Step 2: Substitute this expression into the *other* equation. This will give you a single equation with only one variable.

  3. Step 3: Solve this new equation to find the value of that variable.

  4. Step 4: Substitute the value you just found back into the expression from Step 1 (or either of the original equations) to find the value of the second variable.

  5. Step 5: Write your answer as an ordered pair `(x, y)`.

  6. Step 6 (Optional but Recommended!): Check your solution by plugging both `x` and `y` values into *both* original equations. If they both hold true, your solution is correct!



Let's try an example:

Example 1: Find the point of intersection of the lines:
Line 1: `x + y = 5`
Line 2: `2x - y = 4`

Solution using Substitution Method:

1. From Line 1, it's easy to express `y` in terms of `x`:
`y = 5 - x` (Let's call this Equation 3)

2. Now, substitute this expression for `y` into Line 2:
`2x - (5 - x) = 4`

3. Solve this equation for `x`:
`2x - 5 + x = 4`
`3x - 5 = 4`
`3x = 9`
`x = 3`

4. Substitute `x = 3` back into Equation 3 (`y = 5 - x`):
`y = 5 - 3`
`y = 2`

5. The point of intersection is (3, 2).

6. Let's check:
For Line 1: `3 + 2 = 5` (True!)
For Line 2: `2(3) - 2 = 6 - 2 = 4` (True!)
The solution is correct!




#### Method 2: The Elimination Method (or Addition/Subtraction Method)

This method involves manipulating the equations (by multiplying them by constants) so that when you add or subtract them, one of the variables cancels out.


  1. Step 1: Look at the coefficients of `x` and `y` in both equations. Decide which variable you want to eliminate.

  2. Step 2: Multiply one or both equations by suitable constants so that the coefficients of the variable you want to eliminate become either the same (for subtraction) or opposites (for addition).

  3. Step 3: Add or subtract the modified equations to eliminate one variable.

  4. Step 4: Solve the resulting single-variable equation.

  5. Step 5: Substitute the value you found back into *either* of the original equations to find the value of the second variable.

  6. Step 6 (Optional but Recommended!): Check your solution by plugging both `x` and `y` values into *both* original equations.



Let's use the same example:

Example 2: Find the point of intersection of the lines:
Line 1: `x + y = 5`
Line 2: `2x - y = 4`

Solution using Elimination Method:

1. Notice that the `y` coefficients are `+1` and `-1`. They are already opposites! This is perfect for elimination by addition.

2. No need to multiply by constants in this specific case.

3. Add Line 1 and Line 2:
`(x + y) + (2x - y) = 5 + 4`
`x + 2x + y - y = 9`
`3x = 9`

4. Solve for `x`:
`x = 3`

5. Substitute `x = 3` back into Line 1 (`x + y = 5`):
`3 + y = 5`
`y = 5 - 3`
`y = 2`

6. The point of intersection is (3, 2). (Same result, as expected!)

What if the coefficients aren't so friendly?

Example 3: Find the point of intersection of the lines:
Line 1: `3x + 2y = 12`
Line 2: `5x - 3y = 1`

Solution using Elimination Method:

1. Let's eliminate `y`. The coefficients of `y` are `+2` and `-3`. The least common multiple (LCM) of 2 and 3 is 6. We want to make them `+6y` and `-6y`.

2. Multiply Line 1 by 3: `3 * (3x + 2y) = 3 * 12` => `9x + 6y = 36` (Equation 3)
Multiply Line 2 by 2: `2 * (5x - 3y) = 2 * 1` => `10x - 6y = 2` (Equation 4)

3. Now, add Equation 3 and Equation 4:
`(9x + 6y) + (10x - 6y) = 36 + 2`
`9x + 10x + 6y - 6y = 38`
`19x = 38`

4. Solve for `x`:
`x = 38 / 19`
`x = 2`

5. Substitute `x = 2` back into original Line 1 (`3x + 2y = 12`):
`3(2) + 2y = 12`
`6 + 2y = 12`
`2y = 12 - 6`
`2y = 6`
`y = 3`

6. The point of intersection is (2, 3).

7. Check:
For Line 1: `3(2) + 2(3) = 6 + 6 = 12` (True!)
For Line 2: `5(2) - 3(3) = 10 - 9 = 1` (True!)
Perfect!




CBSE vs. JEE Focus: Both the Substitution and Elimination methods are fundamental and equally important. For CBSE, mastering these will be sufficient. For JEE, you'll use these methods constantly, but often as a smaller part of a larger, more complex problem. You might need to find the intersection of lines to determine a vertex of a triangle, or a point that satisfies certain geometric conditions. The speed and accuracy with which you can solve these systems will be crucial.




### Special Cases: When Lines Don't Intersect (or Intersect Everywhere!)

What happens when we try to solve a system of equations for parallel or coincident lines? Let's see!

#### Case A: Parallel Lines (No Intersection)

Remember, parallel lines have the same slope but different y-intercepts. Algebraically, this means their `A` and `B` coefficients (in `Ax + By + C = 0`) are proportional, but `C` is not.

Consider these lines:
Line 1: `2x + 3y = 6`
Line 2: `4x + 6y = 10`

Let's try to eliminate `x`:
Multiply Line 1 by 2: `4x + 6y = 12` (Equation 3)
Line 2 is: `4x + 6y = 10` (Equation 4)

Now, subtract Equation 4 from Equation 3:
`(4x + 6y) - (4x + 6y) = 12 - 10`
`0 = 2`

Wait! `0 = 2`? Is that true? Absolutely not! This is a false statement.
When you try to solve the system and end up with a false statement (like `0 = 2` or `5 = 1`), it means there is no solution. Geometrically, this confirms that the lines are parallel and will never intersect. They have no common point.




#### Case B: Coincident Lines (Infinite Intersections)

Coincident lines are essentially the same line. Their equations are proportional, including the constant term.

Consider these lines:
Line 1: `x - 2y = 3`
Line 2: `2x - 4y = 6`

Let's try to eliminate `x`:
Multiply Line 1 by 2: `2x - 4y = 6` (Equation 3)
Line 2 is: `2x - 4y = 6` (Equation 4)

Now, subtract Equation 4 from Equation 3:
`(2x - 4y) - (2x - 4y) = 6 - 6`
`0 = 0`

What now? `0 = 0`? This is a true statement!
When you try to solve the system and end up with a true statement (like `0 = 0`), it means there are infinitely many solutions. Geometrically, this confirms that the lines are coincident โ€“ they are the same line, and every point on one line is also on the other.




### Summary Table of Possibilities:

Here's a quick recap of the three scenarios:


























Algebraic Outcome Geometric Interpretation Number of Solutions
Unique value for `x` and `y` Intersecting Lines Exactly One Solution
A false statement (e.g., `0 = 5`) Parallel Lines No Solution
A true statement (e.g., `0 = 0`) Coincident Lines Infinitely Many Solutions





### Why is this important for JEE?

Understanding the intersection of lines is a core building block. You'll encounter it in various forms:

  • Finding the vertices of polygons defined by lines.

  • Determining the center of a circle that passes through the intersection of two lines.

  • Solving problems involving families of lines (lines passing through a fixed point, which is their intersection).

  • In 3D geometry, finding the intersection of planes (which can be a line) or lines.


So, while these methods seem basic, they are your fundamental tools. Practice them until they become second nature!

That's it for the fundamentals of intersecting lines. Make sure you're comfortable with both substitution and elimination methods, and you understand the special cases. Next up, we'll dive deeper into more advanced concepts and applications! Keep practicing!
๐Ÿ”ฌ Deep Dive
Welcome to this detailed exploration of the "Intersection of Lines" โ€“ a fundamental concept in Coordinate Geometry that forms the bedrock for numerous advanced problems in JEE. Understanding how lines interact in a plane is crucial, and we'll dive deep into all possible scenarios, methods to find intersection points, and advanced applications like families of lines and concurrency.

---

### 1. Introduction to Intersection of Lines

In a two-dimensional Cartesian plane, a straight line represents an infinite set of points satisfying a linear equation. When we talk about the "intersection of lines," we are essentially looking for points that lie on *two or more* lines simultaneously. Geometrically, this point (or points) is where the lines cross or coincide.

Consider two distinct lines, L1 and L2. When drawn on a plane, there are only three possible relationships they can have:
1. Intersecting Lines: They cross each other at exactly one unique point. This is the most common scenario we deal with.
2. Parallel and Distinct Lines: They never meet, no matter how far they are extended. In this case, there is no point of intersection.
3. Coincident Lines: They are essentially the same line, lying directly on top of each other. This means they share infinitely many points of intersection.

Our primary goal is to understand these conditions and, for the first case, how to find that unique point of intersection.

---

### 2. Finding the Point of Intersection of Two Lines (Unique Case)

When two lines intersect at a unique point, that point must satisfy the equations of both lines simultaneously. This means finding the point of intersection is equivalent to solving a system of two linear equations in two variables (x and y).

Let the equations of two lines be:


Line 1 (L1): $A_1x + B_1y + C_1 = 0$


Line 2 (L2): $A_2x + B_2y + C_2 = 0$



There are several standard methods to solve such a system:

#### Method 1: Substitution Method
1. Express one variable (say, y) in terms of the other (x) from one equation.
2. Substitute this expression into the second equation.
3. Solve the resulting single-variable equation for x.
4. Substitute the value of x back into the expression from step 1 to find y.

#### Method 2: Elimination Method
1. Multiply one or both equations by suitable constants such that the coefficients of one variable (say, y) become equal in magnitude but opposite in sign.
2. Add the two equations to eliminate that variable.
3. Solve the resulting single-variable equation for the remaining variable (x).
4. Substitute the value of x back into either original equation to find y.

#### Method 3: Cross-Multiplication Method (General Formula Derivation)
This method is particularly efficient for deriving a general formula for the intersection point.
Given:
$A_1x + B_1y + C_1 = 0$
$A_2x + B_2y + C_2 = 0$

Using the cross-multiplication rule:
$frac{x}{B_1C_2 - B_2C_1} = frac{y}{C_1A_2 - C_2A_1} = frac{1}{A_1B_2 - A_2B_1}$

Provided that $A_1B_2 - A_2B_1
eq 0$ (which implies a unique solution, i.e., intersecting lines), the coordinates of the intersection point $(x, y)$ are:


The point of intersection $(x,y)$ is given by:


$x = frac{B_1C_2 - B_2C_1}{A_1B_2 - A_2B_1}$


$y = frac{C_1A_2 - C_2A_1}{A_1B_2 - A_2B_1}$



This formula is very powerful as it directly gives the intersection point for any two lines in general form. Remember this formula, as it can save time in JEE problems.



Example 1: Finding the point of intersection
Find the point of intersection of the lines $2x - 3y + 5 = 0$ and $3x + y - 2 = 0$.

Solution:
We can use the elimination method:
1. Equation 1: $2x - 3y + 5 = 0$
2. Equation 2: $3x + y - 2 = 0$

Multiply Equation 2 by 3 to make the y coefficients suitable for elimination:
$3 imes (3x + y - 2 = 0) implies 9x + 3y - 6 = 0$ (Equation 3)

Now, add Equation 1 and Equation 3:
$(2x - 3y + 5) + (9x + 3y - 6) = 0$
$11x - 1 = 0$
$11x = 1 implies x = frac{1}{11}$

Substitute $x = frac{1}{11}$ into Equation 2:
$3left(frac{1}{11}
ight) + y - 2 = 0$
$frac{3}{11} + y - 2 = 0$
$y = 2 - frac{3}{11} = frac{22 - 3}{11} = frac{19}{11}$

Therefore, the point of intersection is $left(frac{1}{11}, frac{19}{11}
ight)$.

JEE Tip: For objective questions, if the coefficients are straightforward, the general formula (cross-multiplication method) can be faster. Practice all methods to choose the most efficient one for a given problem.

---

### 3. Conditions for Intersection, Parallelism, and Coincidence

Let the two lines be $L_1: A_1x + B_1y + C_1 = 0$ and $L_2: A_2x + B_2y + C_2 = 0$.
The nature of their intersection depends on the ratios of their coefficients.

1. Intersecting Lines (Unique Solution):
The lines intersect at a unique point if and only if their slopes are different.
Slope of $L_1 = m_1 = -frac{A_1}{B_1}$
Slope of $L_2 = m_2 = -frac{A_2}{B_2}$
For unique intersection, $m_1
eq m_2 implies -frac{A_1}{B_1}
eq -frac{A_2}{B_2} implies frac{A_1}{B_1}
eq frac{A_2}{B_2}$.
This can be rewritten as $A_1B_2 - A_2B_1
eq 0$
.
This condition also means that the denominator in the cross-multiplication formula is non-zero, allowing for a unique solution.

2. Parallel and Distinct Lines (No Solution):
The lines are parallel if their slopes are equal, but they have different y-intercepts.
$m_1 = m_2 implies frac{A_1}{B_1} = frac{A_2}{B_2}$ (or $A_1B_2 - A_2B_1 = 0$)
And their y-intercepts are different.
This leads to the condition: $frac{A_1}{A_2} = frac{B_1}{B_2}
eq frac{C_1}{C_2}$
.
In this case, the system of equations has no solution. Geometrically, the lines never meet.

3. Coincident Lines (Infinite Solutions):
The lines are coincident if they are essentially the same line. This means their slopes are equal, and their y-intercepts are also equal.
$frac{A_1}{A_2} = frac{B_1}{B_2} = frac{C_1}{C_2}$.
In this scenario, every point on one line is also a point on the other, leading to infinitely many solutions.



Example 2: Determining the nature of intersection
Determine whether the following pairs of lines are intersecting, parallel, or coincident:
a) $4x + 6y - 7 = 0$ and $2x + 3y + 1 = 0$
b) $x - 2y + 3 = 0$ and $3x - 6y + 9 = 0$
c) $x + y - 1 = 0$ and $2x - y + 4 = 0$

Solution:
a) $L_1: 4x + 6y - 7 = 0 implies A_1=4, B_1=6, C_1=-7$
$L_2: 2x + 3y + 1 = 0 implies A_2=2, B_2=3, C_2=1$
Check ratios:
$frac{A_1}{A_2} = frac{4}{2} = 2$
$frac{B_1}{B_2} = frac{6}{3} = 2$
$frac{C_1}{C_2} = frac{-7}{1} = -7$
Since $frac{A_1}{A_2} = frac{B_1}{B_2}
eq frac{C_1}{C_2}$, the lines are parallel and distinct.

b) $L_1: x - 2y + 3 = 0 implies A_1=1, B_1=-2, C_1=3$
$L_2: 3x - 6y + 9 = 0 implies A_2=3, B_2=-6, C_2=9$
Check ratios:
$frac{A_1}{A_2} = frac{1}{3}$
$frac{B_1}{B_2} = frac{-2}{-6} = frac{1}{3}$
$frac{C_1}{C_2} = frac{3}{9} = frac{1}{3}$
Since $frac{A_1}{A_2} = frac{B_1}{B_2} = frac{C_1}{C_2}$, the lines are coincident.

c) $L_1: x + y - 1 = 0 implies A_1=1, B_1=1, C_1=-1$
$L_2: 2x - y + 4 = 0 implies A_2=2, B_2=-1, C_2=4$
Check ratios:
$frac{A_1}{A_2} = frac{1}{2}$
$frac{B_1}{B_2} = frac{1}{-1} = -1$
Since $frac{A_1}{A_2}
eq frac{B_1}{B_2}$ (i.e., $frac{1}{2}
eq -1$), the lines are intersecting.

---

### 4. Lines Passing Through the Intersection of Two Given Lines (Family of Lines)

This is a critically important concept for JEE Advanced problems. Often, you'll need to find the equation of a line that passes through the intersection of two given lines and also satisfies some other condition. Instead of finding the intersection point first and then using the point-slope form, there's a more elegant and efficient approach.

Consider two lines $L_1 = 0$ and $L_2 = 0$:
$L_1: A_1x + B_1y + C_1 = 0$
$L_2: A_2x + B_2y + C_2 = 0$

The equation of any straight line passing through the point of intersection of $L_1 = 0$ and $L_2 = 0$ is given by:


$L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0$


or


$(A_1x + B_1y + C_1) + lambda (A_2x + B_2y + C_2) = 0$


where $lambda$ (lambda) is any real number.

#### Why does this work?
1. It's a Line: Expanding the equation $(A_1x + B_1y + C_1) + lambda (A_2x + B_2y + C_2) = 0$, we get $(A_1 + lambda A_2)x + (B_1 + lambda B_2)y + (C_1 + lambda C_2) = 0$. This is clearly a linear equation in x and y (of the form $Ax + By + C = 0$), so it represents a straight line.
2. It Passes Through the Intersection: Let $(x_0, y_0)$ be the point of intersection of $L_1=0$ and $L_2=0$. This means $(x_0, y_0)$ satisfies both equations:
$A_1x_0 + B_1y_0 + C_1 = 0$
$A_2x_0 + B_2y_0 + C_2 = 0$
Now, substitute $(x_0, y_0)$ into the family equation:
$(A_1x_0 + B_1y_0 + C_1) + lambda (A_2x_0 + B_2y_0 + C_2) = 0$
$0 + lambda (0) = 0$
$0 = 0$
Since this equation holds true for any value of $lambda$, any line represented by $L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0$ must pass through the point of intersection $(x_0, y_0)$.

Important Note: This family of lines includes every line passing through the intersection point EXCEPT for the line $L_2=0$ itself (because $L_2=0$ would require $lambda$ to be infinite, or effectively, for $L_1$ to be zero and then a constant times $L_2$ be zero. If you write it as $k_1 L_1 + k_2 L_2 = 0$, then both $L_1=0$ (when $k_2=0$) and $L_2=0$ (when $k_1=0$) are included). In most practical problems, $L_2=0$ is implicitly handled, or it's obvious from the context which specific line is being sought.

To find a specific line from this family, you will always be given one additional condition, which allows you to determine the value of $lambda$.



Example 3: Line through intersection and another point
Find the equation of the line passing through the intersection of lines $x + y - 5 = 0$ and $2x - y + 4 = 0$, and also passing through the point $(1, 2)$.

Solution:
Let $L_1: x + y - 5 = 0$ and $L_2: 2x - y + 4 = 0$.
The equation of a line passing through their intersection is $L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0$:
$(x + y - 5) + lambda (2x - y + 4) = 0$

This line also passes through the point $(1, 2)$. Substitute $x=1$ and $y=2$ into the equation:
$(1 + 2 - 5) + lambda (2(1) - 2 + 4) = 0$
$(-2) + lambda (2 - 2 + 4) = 0$
$-2 + lambda (4) = 0$
$4lambda = 2 implies lambda = frac{1}{2}$

Now substitute $lambda = frac{1}{2}$ back into the family equation:
$(x + y - 5) + frac{1}{2} (2x - y + 4) = 0$
Multiply by 2 to clear the fraction:
$2(x + y - 5) + (2x - y + 4) = 0$
$2x + 2y - 10 + 2x - y + 4 = 0$
$4x + y - 6 = 0$

This is the required equation of the line.



Example 4: Line through intersection and parallel to another line
Find the equation of the line passing through the intersection of lines $3x - y = 0$ and $x + y - 2 = 0$, and parallel to the line $x + 2y = 0$.

Solution:
Let $L_1: 3x - y = 0$ and $L_2: x + y - 2 = 0$.
The equation of a line passing through their intersection is $L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0$:
$(3x - y) + lambda (x + y - 2) = 0$
Rearrange this into the general form $Ax + By + C = 0$:
$(3 + lambda)x + (-1 + lambda)y - 2lambda = 0$

The slope of this line is $m = -frac{ ext{Coefficient of x}}{ ext{Coefficient of y}} = -frac{(3 + lambda)}{(-1 + lambda)} = frac{3 + lambda}{1 - lambda}$.

The required line is parallel to $x + 2y = 0$.
The slope of $x + 2y = 0$ is $m_{parallel} = -frac{1}{2}$.
Since the lines are parallel, their slopes must be equal:
$frac{3 + lambda}{1 - lambda} = -frac{1}{2}$
$2(3 + lambda) = -1(1 - lambda)$
$6 + 2lambda = -1 + lambda$
$2lambda - lambda = -1 - 6$
$lambda = -7$

Now substitute $lambda = -7$ back into the family equation:
$(3x - y) - 7(x + y - 2) = 0$
$3x - y - 7x - 7y + 14 = 0$
$-4x - 8y + 14 = 0$
Dividing by -2:
$2x + 4y - 7 = 0$

This is the required equation of the line.

---

### 5. Concurrency of Three Lines

Three or more lines are said to be concurrent if they all pass through a single common point.

To check if three given lines are concurrent:
Let the three lines be:
$L_1: A_1x + B_1y + C_1 = 0$
$L_2: A_2x + B_2y + C_2 = 0$
$L_3: A_3x + B_3y + C_3 = 0$

#### Method 1: Direct Verification
1. Find the point of intersection of any two lines (say, $L_1$ and $L_2$) using methods discussed earlier.
2. Substitute the coordinates of this intersection point into the equation of the third line ($L_3$).
3. If the point satisfies $L_3=0$, then the three lines are concurrent. Otherwise, they are not.

#### Method 2: Using Determinants (JEE Advanced Focus)
Three lines $A_1x + B_1y + C_1 = 0$, $A_2x + B_2y + C_2 = 0$, and $A_3x + B_3y + C_3 = 0$ are concurrent if and only if the determinant of their coefficients is zero.


$egin{vmatrix} A_1 & B_1 & C_1 \ A_2 & B_2 & C_2 \ A_3 & B_3 & C_3 end{vmatrix} = 0$



#### Derivation of the Determinant Condition:
If the three lines are concurrent, there exists a unique point $(x_0, y_0)$ that satisfies all three equations:
$A_1x_0 + B_1y_0 + C_1 = 0$
$A_2x_0 + B_2y_0 + C_2 = 0$
$A_3x_0 + B_3y_0 + C_3 = 0$

This is a system of three linear equations in $x_0$ and $y_0$. For a non-trivial solution (i.e., not all coefficients being zero in a specific way) for $x_0$ and $y_0$ to exist, and for consistency, the determinant of the coefficients (when viewed as a system for $x_0, y_0, 1$) must be zero.
Alternatively, consider that if they are concurrent, the third line must be part of the family of lines passing through the intersection of the first two.
So, $L_3$ can be expressed as $L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0$ for some $lambda$.
This means $(A_3x + B_3y + C_3)$ is linearly dependent on $(A_1x + B_1y + C_1)$ and $(A_2x + B_2y + C_2)$.
The condition for linear dependence of three linear forms $L_1, L_2, L_3$ is that the determinant of their coefficients is zero. This is a direct application from linear algebra.



Example 5: Checking for concurrency
Check if the lines $x - y + 1 = 0$, $2x + y - 10 = 0$, and $3x - 2y + 4 = 0$ are concurrent.

Solution:
Method 1: Direct Verification
1. Find the intersection of $L_1: x - y + 1 = 0$ and $L_2: 2x + y - 10 = 0$.
Adding the two equations:
$(x - y + 1) + (2x + y - 10) = 0$
$3x - 9 = 0 implies 3x = 9 implies x = 3$
Substitute $x=3$ into $L_1$:
$3 - y + 1 = 0 implies 4 - y = 0 implies y = 4$
The intersection point of $L_1$ and $L_2$ is $(3, 4)$.

2. Substitute $(3, 4)$ into $L_3: 3x - 2y + 4 = 0$.
$3(3) - 2(4) + 4$
$9 - 8 + 4 = 5$
Since $5
eq 0$, the point $(3, 4)$ does *not* satisfy the equation of $L_3$.
Therefore, the three lines are not concurrent.

Method 2: Using Determinants
Coefficients are:
$L_1: (1, -1, 1)$
$L_2: (2, 1, -10)$
$L_3: (3, -2, 4)$

Calculate the determinant:
$egin{vmatrix} 1 & -1 & 1 \ 2 & 1 & -10 \ 3 & -2 & 4 end{vmatrix}$
$= 1(1 imes 4 - (-10) imes (-2)) - (-1)(2 imes 4 - (-10) imes 3) + 1(2 imes (-2) - 1 imes 3)$
$= 1(4 - 20) + 1(8 + 30) + 1(-4 - 3)$
$= 1(-16) + 1(38) + 1(-7)$
$= -16 + 38 - 7$
$= 22 - 7 = 15$

Since the determinant is $15
eq 0$, the lines are not concurrent. This confirms the result from Method 1.

---

### 6. JEE Focus: Advanced Applications

The concepts of intersection and family of lines are foundational. In JEE problems, they are rarely asked in isolation. Instead, they are combined with other concepts:

* Distance Formulas: Find a line passing through an intersection point such that its distance from a given point is maximized/minimized.
* Angles between Lines: Find a line through an intersection that makes a specific angle with another line.
* Reflection: Problems involving light rays reflecting off a line, where the incident and reflected rays meet at a point on the line.
* Area of Triangles: Calculating the area of a triangle formed by three lines (by finding their three intersection points).
* Locus Problems: Finding the locus of a point related to intersecting lines (e.g., orthocenter, circumcenter, incenter, excenters, when they are defined by a parameter).
* Conic Sections: Tangents to conic sections often involve lines passing through specific points, which might be an intersection of other lines.

The "family of lines" concept ($L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0$) is particularly powerful for JEE problems because it allows you to represent the desired line without explicitly finding the intersection point, thereby simplifying calculations. Master its application!

---
๐ŸŽฏ Shortcuts
In competitive exams like JEE Main, speed and accuracy are paramount. Mnemonics and practical shortcuts can significantly reduce calculation time and help recall crucial conditions instantly. This section focuses on such tools for the "Intersection of Lines" topic.

### 1. Shortcut for Finding the Intersection Point (Cross-Multiplication Method)

When you need to find the exact coordinates of the intersection of two lines, the cross-multiplication method is often faster than substitution or elimination, especially under timed conditions.

Given two lines:
$L_1: a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0$
$L_2: a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0$

The intersection point $(x, y)$ can be found using the formula:
$frac{x}{b_1c_2 - b_2c_1} = frac{y}{c_1a_2 - c_2a_1} = frac{1}{a_1b_2 - a_2b_1}$

Mnemonic to Remember Coefficients:
To recall the denominators easily, write down the coefficients in a specific order:
$b quad c quad a quad b$
For the two equations, stack them:
$b_1 quad c_1 quad a_1 quad b_1$
$b_2 quad c_2 quad a_2 quad b_2$

Now, multiply diagonally downwards and subtract the product of diagonally upwards terms:
* For $x$: $(b_1c_2 - b_2c_1)$
* For $y$: $(c_1a_2 - c_2a_1)$
* For $1$: $(a_1b_2 - a_2b_1)$

JEE Tip: Master this method. It saves critical seconds compared to solving simultaneous equations from scratch.

Example: Find the intersection of $2x + 3y - 7 = 0$ and $3x - 2y - 4 = 0$.
Here, $a_1=2, b_1=3, c_1=-7$ and $a_2=3, b_2=-2, c_2=-4$.
Using the mnemonic:
$3 quad -7 quad 2 quad 3$
$-2 quad -4 quad 3 quad -2$

$frac{x}{(3)(-4) - (-2)(-7)} = frac{y}{(-7)(3) - (-4)(2)} = frac{1}{(2)(-2) - (3)(3)}$
$frac{x}{-12 - 14} = frac{y}{-21 - (-8)} = frac{1}{-4 - 9}$
$frac{x}{-26} = frac{y}{-13} = frac{1}{-13}$
$x = frac{-26}{-13} = 2$
$y = frac{-13}{-13} = 1$
The intersection point is $(2, 1)$.

---

### 2. Conditions for Types of Intersection

For two linear equations $a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0$ and $a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0$:


























Type of Lines Condition Number of Solutions
Intersecting (Unique Solution) $frac{a_1}{a_2}
e frac{b_1}{b_2}$
One
Parallel (No Solution) $frac{a_1}{a_2} = frac{b_1}{b_2}
e frac{c_1}{c_2}$
Zero
Coincident (Infinite Solutions) $frac{a_1}{a_2} = frac{b_1}{b_2} = frac{c_1}{c_2}$ Infinite


Mnemonic for Parallel vs. Coincident:
* Think of the $c$ (constant) term as the "meeting point" or "alignment".
* Parallel lines: The 'P' stands for Partial match. $a/a$ and $b/b$ ratios match, but the $c/c$ ratio does NOT match ($
e c_1/c_2$). If their "alignment" isn't fully matched, they will never meet.
* Coincident lines: The 'C' stands for Complete match. All ratios ($a/a, b/b, c/c$) match perfectly. This means they are the exact same line, hence infinite intersections.

---

### 3. Family of Lines Passing Through the Intersection of Two Given Lines

This is an extremely powerful shortcut for JEE problems.
If you have two lines $L_1 = a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0$ and $L_2 = a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0$, then any line passing through their intersection point can be represented by the equation:
$L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0$
$(a_1x + b_1y + c_1) + lambda(a_2x + b_2y + c_2) = 0$
where $lambda$ is an arbitrary constant.

JEE Tip: This formula allows you to find a specific line that passes through the intersection of two lines *without actually calculating the intersection point*. This is a huge time-saver. You'll typically use an additional condition given in the problem (e.g., passing through another point, parallel/perpendicular to another line, specific intercept) to find the value of $lambda$.

For instance, if a problem asks for a line passing through the intersection of $L_1$ and $L_2$ and also through point $(x_0, y_0)$, you simply substitute $(x_0, y_0)$ into $L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0$ to find $lambda$.

Mastering these shortcuts will significantly boost your problem-solving speed and accuracy in coordinate geometry. Keep practicing!
๐Ÿ’ก Quick Tips

Quick Tips for Intersection of Lines


Understanding the intersection of lines is fundamental in coordinate geometry, serving as a building block for more complex topics in JEE Main. These quick tips will help you approach problems efficiently and accurately.



1. Core Concept & Interpretation



  • The intersection point of two distinct lines is the unique point that satisfies the equations of both lines simultaneously. Geometrically, it's where the lines cross each other.

  • Algebraically, finding the intersection involves solving a system of two linear equations in two variables (x, y).



2. Methods for Finding Intersection Point


For two lines, $L_1: a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0$ and $L_2: a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0$:



  • Substitution Method: Express one variable (e.g., $y$) from one equation in terms of the other variable ($x$), and substitute this expression into the second equation. Solve for $x$, then find $y$.

  • Elimination Method: Multiply one or both equations by suitable constants to make the coefficients of one variable (e.g., $x$) equal or opposite. Add or subtract the equations to eliminate that variable, then solve for the remaining variable.

  • JEE Tip - Cramer's Rule (Determinant Method): This is often the fastest method for competitive exams.

    The solution $(x, y)$ is given by:


    $$x = frac{egin{vmatrix} -c_1 & b_1 \ -c_2 & b_2 end{vmatrix}}{egin{vmatrix} a_1 & b_1 \ a_2 & b_2 end{vmatrix}}$$
    $$y = frac{egin{vmatrix} a_1 & -c_1 \ a_2 & -c_2 end{vmatrix}}{egin{vmatrix} a_1 & b_1 \ a_2 & b_2 end{vmatrix}}$$

    Provided the denominator determinant $Delta = egin{vmatrix} a_1 & b_1 \ a_2 & b_2 end{vmatrix} = a_1b_2 - a_2b_1
    eq 0$.





3. Conditions for Intersection (or Lack Thereof)


Based on the system of equations:































Condition Geometric Interpretation Algebraic Condition Number of Solutions
Unique Intersection Intersecting Lines $frac{a_1}{a_2}
eq frac{b_1}{b_2}$ (or $Delta
eq 0$)
Exactly one solution
No Intersection Parallel Lines (distinct) $frac{a_1}{a_2} = frac{b_1}{b_2}
eq frac{c_1}{c_2}$ (or $Delta = 0$ and $Delta_x
eq 0$ or $Delta_y
eq 0$)
No solution
Infinite Intersections Coincident Lines (same line) $frac{a_1}{a_2} = frac{b_1}{b_2} = frac{c_1}{c_2}$ (or $Delta = 0$ and $Delta_x = 0$ and $Delta_y = 0$) Infinitely many solutions

Important: Always check these conditions first, especially for parameters-based problems, to avoid unnecessary calculations if no unique solution exists.



4. JEE Main Special: Family of Lines


The equation of any straight line passing through the point of intersection of two given lines $L_1: a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0$ and $L_2: a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0$ is given by:


$L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0$


i.e., $(a_1x + b_1y + c_1) + lambda(a_2x + b_2y + c_2) = 0$, where $lambda$ is a real parameter.



  • This concept is extremely useful as it allows you to find a specific line passing through the intersection point *without* actually calculating the intersection point itself.

  • Use an additional condition given in the problem (e.g., passing through another point, parallel/perpendicular to another line, specific intercept) to find the value of $lambda$.



Mastering these quick tips will not only improve your speed but also your accuracy in solving problems related to lines and their intersections. Keep practicing!

๐Ÿง  Intuitive Understanding

Welcome to the intuitive understanding of how lines interact in a coordinate plane. This fundamental concept is crucial not just for straight lines, but also forms the basis for understanding the intersection of other curves like circles, parabolas, and ellipses.



What Does "Intersection of Lines" Mean?


At its core, the intersection of lines refers to the point (or points) where two or more lines meet or cross each other. Imagine drawing two straight lines on a piece of paper; the spot where they physically touch is their point of intersection.





  • Geometrically: It's the unique point that lies on all the intersecting lines simultaneously. If you're given two distinct lines, they will either cross at exactly one point or never cross at all (if they are parallel).


  • Algebraically: Each straight line can be represented by a linear equation (e.g., (Ax + By + C = 0)). The point of intersection is the solution that satisfies all the equations of the lines simultaneously. In other words, if ((x_0, y_0)) is the point of intersection, then substituting (x_0) and (y_0) into each line's equation will make all equations true.



Types of Intersection (JEE Perspective)


For JEE and board exams, understanding the different scenarios of line intersection is vital. It's not always just a single point:
































Scenario Geometric Interpretation Algebraic Interpretation Number of Solutions
1. Unique Intersection Two non-parallel lines cross at exactly one point. Their equations form a consistent system with a unique solution. This happens when the ratio of coefficients (A_1/A_2
eq B_1/B_2).
One point (x, y)
2. No Intersection Two lines are parallel and distinct. They never meet. Their equations form an inconsistent system with no solution. This happens when (A_1/A_2 = B_1/B_2
eq C_1/C_2).
Zero (no solution)
3. Infinite Intersections Two lines are coincident (they are essentially the same line). Every point on one line is also on the other. Their equations form a consistent system with infinitely many solutions. This happens when (A_1/A_2 = B_1/B_2 = C_1/C_2). Infinite points


Example: Consider two lines: (L_1: x + y = 5) and (L_2: x - y = 1). If you were to plot these, you'd see them cross. The point where they cross is ((3, 2)). This is because (3+2=5) and (3-2=1). The point ((3,2)) satisfies both equations, making it their unique point of intersection.



Importance in Exams


Understanding line intersection is crucial for various JEE topics:




  • System of Equations: It's the visual representation of solving a system of linear equations.


  • Concurrency of Lines: Three or more lines are concurrent if they intersect at a single common point.


  • Family of Lines: The equation of a line passing through the intersection of two given lines (L_1=0) and (L_2=0) is given by (L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0). This is a powerful concept for JEE.


  • Geometric Problems: Finding vertices of triangles, quadrilaterals, or other polygons often involves finding the intersection points of their sides.


Mastering this basic concept will provide a strong foundation for more complex problems in coordinate geometry.

๐ŸŒ Real World Applications
The concept of the intersection of lines is not just an abstract mathematical idea; it forms the backbone of numerous real-world applications across various disciplines. Understanding where two or more linear paths meet is critical for design, planning, and problem-solving in fields ranging from engineering to economics.

Here are some practical applications where the intersection of lines plays a vital role:



  • Traffic Management and Urban Planning:

    In city planning, roads and highways are often modeled as lines. The points where these "lines" intersect represent junctions or crossroads. Engineers use the principles of line intersection to design traffic signals, plan flyovers, underpasses, and roundabouts, ensuring smooth traffic flow and minimizing congestion and accidents. For instance, determining the optimal timing for traffic lights at a four-way intersection relies on understanding the meeting points of different traffic streams.




  • Economics and Business Analysis:

    In economics, supply and demand curves can often be represented as linear equations (at least over certain ranges). The point where the supply line intersects the demand line is known as the equilibrium point. This intersection determines the market equilibrium price and quantity, where the amount of a product supplied equals the amount demanded. Similarly, in business, break-even analysis involves finding the intersection of cost and revenue lines to determine the sales volume at which a business makes no profit or loss.




  • Computer Graphics and Gaming:

    The concept of line intersection is fundamental in computer graphics, especially for rendering and collision detection in video games. For example, in ray tracing, a technique used to generate realistic images, "rays" (which are essentially lines) are cast from a virtual camera into a 3D scene. The intersection points of these rays with objects' surfaces (often defined by intersecting lines and planes) determine what is visible and how light interacts with the scene. In gaming, detecting if a bullet (modeled as a line segment) hits an enemy (modeled by polygons, which are collections of line segments) involves calculating line intersections.




  • Engineering and Architecture:

    Architects and structural engineers extensively use line intersections in their designs. When designing building frameworks, bridges, or complex machinery, the points where beams, columns, or structural components intersect are critical. These intersection points are where forces are concentrated, and their precise location and angles are essential for calculating stress, ensuring structural integrity, and optimizing material use. Similarly, in plumbing or electrical layouts, understanding where pipes or wires cross helps in preventing clashes and ensures efficient routing.




  • Navigation and GPS Systems:

    While GPS primarily uses spherical coordinates, simplified navigation systems or specific tasks can involve line intersections. For instance, if a ship receives bearings (directional lines) from two different lighthouses, the point where these two bearing lines intersect on a map indicates the ship's current position. This is a basic form of triangulation, a method for locating a point by forming triangles with known points.





These examples highlight how the ability to find the intersection of lines is a foundational skill with direct practical applications, making it a crucial topic not just for exams but for understanding the world around us. Keep an eye out for these linear intersections in your daily life!
๐Ÿ”„ Common Analogies

Common Analogies for Intersection of Lines



Understanding the intersection of lines in coordinate geometry becomes much clearer when related to real-world scenarios. Analogies help to visualize and solidify the mathematical concepts, making them intuitive and easier to recall. Here are a couple of common analogies:

1. Roads and Highways


This is perhaps the most intuitive analogy for understanding how lines interact in a plane.



  • Intersecting Lines: Crossing Roads/Junctions

    Imagine two different roads or highways that cross each other. At the point where they meet, there is an intersection or a junction. This single, unique point is where both roads exist simultaneously. In mathematics, this corresponds to two lines having a unique solution โ€“ a single point (x, y) that satisfies the equations of both lines.


    JEE Relevance: Finding this point is crucial for problems involving distances from the intersection, areas of triangles formed by intersecting lines, or conditions for concurrency.


  • Parallel Lines: Lanes on a Highway/Parallel Streets

    Consider two lanes on a highway going in the same direction, or two parallel streets in a city. These roads run side-by-side, maintaining a constant distance from each other, and they never meet or cross. Similarly, in coordinate geometry, parallel lines have the same slope but different y-intercepts, and their equations have no common solution. This means they will never intersect.


    JEE Relevance: Identifying parallel lines is fundamental for problems related to distances between parallel lines or finding the equation of a line parallel to another.


  • Coincident Lines: The Same Road

    Imagine two different names given to the exact same stretch of road, or perhaps one road being built directly on top of another such that they occupy the identical path. These roads are essentially the same road. In mathematics, coincident lines have the same slope and the same y-intercept. Their equations are proportional to each other, meaning they represent the exact same line. Consequently, they have infinitely many solutions, as every point on one line is also a point on the other.


    JEE Relevance: Understanding coincident lines is important when determining consistency of systems of linear equations or analyzing conditions under which two line equations represent the same path.



2. Train Tracks


Another effective analogy, particularly for the concept of parallel lines.



  • Intersecting Tracks: Rail Junctions/Switches

    At a train station or a rail yard, you often see different tracks converging or crossing each other at a junction or switch point. Trains from different lines can use these specific points to change routes. This is a clear representation of two lines intersecting at a unique point.


  • Parallel Tracks: Standard Rail Lines

    The most common image of train tracks is two rails running perfectly parallel to each other, maintaining a fixed distance. These rails are designed never to meet, ensuring the train travels straight. This perfectly illustrates the concept of parallel lines in geometry, which never intersect.


  • Coincident Tracks: Two trains on the same track

    While less common physically, imagine two trains running on the exact same set of tracks, one directly behind the other, or two separate track plans that are identical. This represents the idea of coincident lines where they share every single point, leading to infinitely many points of intersection.



These analogies provide a tangible way to grasp the abstract concepts of intersecting, parallel, and coincident lines, making it easier to apply these principles when solving problems in coordinate geometry. A strong conceptual foundation is key for both CBSE board exams and JEE Main.
๐Ÿ“‹ Prerequisites

Prerequisites for Intersection of Lines



Before diving into the concept of the intersection of lines, it's crucial to have a strong foundation in basic straight-line concepts and algebraic techniques. These foundational skills will enable you to understand and efficiently solve problems related to intersecting lines in both board exams and competitive examinations like JEE.



Fundamental Straight Line Concepts




  • Understanding Different Forms of a Straight Line Equation:


    • General Form: Ax + By + C = 0. You should be able to derive any other form from this and vice versa.


    • Slope-Intercept Form: y = mx + c, where 'm' is the slope and 'c' is the y-intercept.


    • Point-Slope Form: y - yโ‚ = m(x - xโ‚), representing a line passing through (xโ‚, yโ‚) with slope 'm'.


    • Two-Point Form: (y - yโ‚)/(x - xโ‚) = (yโ‚‚ - yโ‚)/(xโ‚‚ - xโ‚), for a line passing through (xโ‚, yโ‚) and (xโ‚‚, yโ‚‚).




  • Slope of a Line:


    • Knowledge of how to calculate the slope given two points (xโ‚, yโ‚) and (xโ‚‚, yโ‚‚) using m = (yโ‚‚ - yโ‚)/(xโ‚‚ - xโ‚).


    • Understanding that for a line Ax + By + C = 0, the slope m = -A/B.




  • Conditions for Parallel and Perpendicular Lines:


    • Parallel Lines: Two lines with slopes mโ‚ and mโ‚‚ are parallel if mโ‚ = mโ‚‚.


    • Perpendicular Lines: Two lines with slopes mโ‚ and mโ‚‚ are perpendicular if mโ‚ * mโ‚‚ = -1 (provided both slopes exist). If one is vertical, the other must be horizontal.





Algebraic Techniques




  • Solving Systems of Linear Equations:
    The point of intersection of two lines is essentially the solution to the system of equations representing those lines.


    • CBSE Focus: Mastery of methods like substitution and elimination is essential for finding the unique solution (intersection point).


    • JEE Focus: While substitution and elimination are fundamental, JEE problems often benefit from a quicker understanding of the nature of solutions for systems of linear equations. You should be familiar with the conditions for:

      • Unique Solution: aโ‚/aโ‚‚ โ‰  bโ‚/bโ‚‚ (intersecting lines)

      • No Solution: aโ‚/aโ‚‚ = bโ‚/bโ‚‚ โ‰  cโ‚/cโ‚‚ (parallel and distinct lines)

      • Infinitely Many Solutions: aโ‚/aโ‚‚ = bโ‚/bโ‚‚ = cโ‚/cโ‚‚ (coincident lines)


      Familiarity with Cramer's Rule (using determinants) can significantly speed up solving systems in JEE.






Motivational Note: Mastering these prerequisites will not only make "Intersection of Lines" straightforward but also lay a solid foundation for more advanced topics in coordinate geometry, like pairs of straight lines and conic sections. Practice these basic concepts diligently!


โš ๏ธ Common Exam Traps
Understanding common pitfalls is crucial for excelling in exams. For "Intersection of Lines," many traps arise from overlooking special cases, algebraic errors, or misinterpreting the question's context.

Here are some common exam traps related to the intersection of lines:



  • Algebraic Calculation Errors:

    • Trap: The most frequent mistake is making simple arithmetic errors or sign errors while solving the system of two linear equations. Whether using substitution, elimination, or determinant methods, a small calculation slip can lead to an incorrect intersection point.

    • Tip: After finding your intersection point (x, y), always substitute these values back into *both* original line equations to verify they satisfy both. This quick check can save significant marks.




  • Ignoring Parallel or Coincident Lines:

    • Trap: Students often jump directly to solving the equations without first checking the relationship between the lines. If the lines are parallel (slopes are equal, y-intercepts are different), they will never intersect, leading to an inconsistent system (e.g., 0 = 5). If they are coincident (slopes and y-intercepts are equal), they are the same line, intersecting at infinitely many points, leading to an identity (e.g., 0 = 0).

    • Tip: Always compare the slopes (and y-intercepts, if necessary) of the lines first. For lines $A_1x + B_1y + C_1 = 0$ and $A_2x + B_2y + C_2 = 0$:

      • If $A_1/A_2 = B_1/B_2
        e C_1/C_2$, lines are parallel (no intersection).

      • If $A_1/A_2 = B_1/B_2 = C_1/C_2$, lines are coincident (infinite intersections).

      • Otherwise, they intersect at a unique point.






  • Incorrect Handling of Vertical Lines:

    • Trap: For a vertical line (equation of the form $x=k$), its slope is undefined. Trying to use $y = mx + c$ directly for such a line is incorrect and can lead to confusion or errors.

    • Tip: If one line is vertical (e.g., $x=3$), simply substitute $x=3$ into the equation of the other line to find the y-coordinate of the intersection point. Similarly for horizontal lines ($y=k$).




  • Parameter-Dependent Lines (JEE Specific):

    • Trap: Questions often involve lines with unknown parameters (e.g., $kx + (k+1)y + 5 = 0$). Students might overlook conditions where the parameter makes the lines parallel, or where a denominator in the solution becomes zero.

    • Tip: Always analyze how the parameter affects the slopes and coefficients. Consider edge cases where the parameter might lead to special conditions (e.g., a vertical line, parallel lines).




  • Confusing Concurrency with Simple Intersection of Two Lines:

    • Trap: When dealing with three or more lines, students might incorrectly assume they are concurrent (pass through a single point) without verifying.

    • Tip: To check for concurrency of three lines:

      1. Find the intersection point of any two of the lines.

      2. Substitute this point's coordinates into the equation of the third line.

      3. If the equation is satisfied, the lines are concurrent. If not, they form a triangle.






  • Not Verifying Solution in Contextual Problems:

    • Trap: Some problems might ask for an intersection point that satisfies additional conditions, such as lying in a specific quadrant, on a given line segment, or within a particular region. Finding the algebraic intersection point but failing to check these conditions is a common trap.

    • Tip: Always read the question carefully. After finding the algebraic intersection, ensure it meets *all* the stated geometric or contextual constraints. For example, if it asks for an intersection in the first quadrant, check if both x and y coordinates are positive.





Staying vigilant against these traps through careful calculation and conceptual understanding will significantly improve your accuracy and scores.
โญ Key Takeaways

Key Takeaways: Intersection of Lines



Understanding the intersection of lines is fundamental in coordinate geometry. This section summarizes the crucial concepts and methods you need to master for both board exams and JEE Main.



1. Definition of Intersection Point



  • The point of intersection of two or more lines is the unique point that lies on all those lines simultaneously.

  • Algebraically, it is the common solution to the system of linear equations representing the lines.



2. Methods to Find the Point of Intersection


Given two lines: L1: a1x + b1y + c1 = 0 and L2: a2x + b2y + c2 = 0.



  • Solving Simultaneous Equations: This is the most common approach.

    • Substitution Method: Express one variable in terms of the other from one equation and substitute it into the second equation.

    • Elimination Method: Multiply equations by suitable constants to make the coefficients of one variable equal, then add or subtract the equations to eliminate that variable.

    • Cross-Multiplication Method: A direct formula for x and y:

      x / (b1c2 - b2c1) = y / (c1a2 - c2a1) = 1 / (a1b2 - a2b1)

      (Valid only when a1b2 - a2b1 โ‰  0)





3. Conditions for Intersection (Nature of Solutions)


The type of intersection depends on the relationship between the slopes and y-intercepts of the lines.



























Condition Geometric Interpretation Number of Solutions
a1/a2 โ‰  b1/b2 Lines are intersecting (non-parallel) Unique Point
a1/a2 = b1/b2 โ‰  c1/c2 Lines are parallel and distinct No Point
a1/a2 = b1/b2 = c1/c2 Lines are coincident (same line) Infinitely Many Points


4. Concurrency of Three Lines (JEE Specific)


Three lines L1: a1x + b1y + c1 = 0, L2: a2x + b2y + c2 = 0, and L3: a3x + b3y + c3 = 0 are concurrent (intersect at a single point) if and only if the determinant of their coefficients is zero:




| a1 b1 c1 |

| a2 b2 c2 | = 0

| a3 b3 c3 |


JEE Tip: This determinant condition is a powerful tool for checking concurrency without finding the intersection point explicitly. It's also used to find an unknown parameter for which lines are concurrent.



5. Equation of a Line Passing Through the Intersection of Two Given Lines


If L1: a1x + b1y + c1 = 0 and L2: a2x + b2y + c2 = 0 are two intersecting lines, then the equation of any line passing through their point of intersection can be written as:



L1 + ฮปL2 = 0

i.e., (a1x + b1y + c1) + ฮป(a2x + b2y + c2) = 0


where ฮป (lambda) is any real constant. This represents a family of lines passing through the intersection point. To find a specific line from this family, one more condition (e.g., passing through another point, slope, intercept) will be given, allowing you to determine ฮป.


JEE Importance: This concept, often called the "Family of Lines," is extremely important for JEE Main and Advanced. It simplifies problems significantly as you don't need to explicitly find the intersection point first.




Keep these points in mind for effective problem-solving! Practice applying these conditions and methods diligently.


๐Ÿงฉ Problem Solving Approach

Problem Solving Approach: Intersection of Lines



Finding the intersection point of two straight lines is a fundamental concept in coordinate geometry. This point is the unique solution (x, y) that satisfies the equations of both lines simultaneously. The approach involves solving a system of two linear equations in two variables.

1. General Approach


Given two linear equations representing straight lines:



  • Line 1: $a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0$

  • Line 2: $a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0$


The core task is to find the values of x and y that satisfy both equations. This requires solving these simultaneous linear equations.



2. Methods for Solving Simultaneous Equations



a) Substitution Method



  1. From one equation, express one variable in terms of the other (e.g., $y = (c_1 - a_1x)/b_1$).

  2. Substitute this expression into the second equation.

  3. Solve the resulting single-variable linear equation for the remaining variable.

  4. Substitute this value back into the expression from step 1 to find the value of the first variable.



b) Elimination Method



  1. Multiply one or both equations by suitable constants such that the coefficients of one variable (either x or y) become equal in magnitude but opposite in sign.

  2. Add the two modified equations to eliminate that variable.

  3. Solve the resulting single-variable linear equation.

  4. Substitute this value back into either of the original equations to find the value of the other variable.



c) JEE Specific: Cramer's Rule / Determinant Method


This method is highly efficient for competitive exams, especially when dealing with parameters or when a quick check for special cases is needed.


For the system: $a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0$ and $a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0$, we can rewrite them as $a_1x + b_1y = -c_1$ and $a_2x + b_2y = -c_2$.


The point of intersection $(x, y)$ is given by:

















$x$ $y$ $1$
$frac{b_1(-c_2) - b_2(-c_1)}{a_1b_2 - a_2b_1}$ $frac{(-c_1)a_2 - (-c_2)a_1}{a_1b_2 - a_2b_1}$ $frac{1}{a_1b_2 - a_2b_1}$

Alternatively, if written as $a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0$ and $a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0$ directly:


$x = frac{b_1c_2 - b_2c_1}{a_1b_2 - a_2b_1}$ and $y = frac{c_1a_2 - c_2a_1}{a_1b_2 - a_2b_1}$


This method directly provides the coordinates provided the denominator $D = a_1b_2 - a_2b_1
e 0$.



3. Special Cases: No or Infinite Solutions


Before proceeding with solving, it's crucial to check for these conditions. This is particularly important for JEE Main where such questions frequently appear.




  • Parallel and Distinct Lines (No Solution):
    If $frac{a_1}{a_2} = frac{b_1}{b_2}
    e frac{c_1}{c_2}$ (i.e., slopes are equal but y-intercepts are different), the lines are parallel and never intersect. The determinant $D = a_1b_2 - a_2b_1 = 0$, but at least one of the numerators in Cramer's Rule will be non-zero.


  • Coincident Lines (Infinite Solutions):
    If $frac{a_1}{a_2} = frac{b_1}{b_2} = frac{c_1}{c_2}$ (i.e., the lines are identical), they intersect at every point. The determinant $D = a_1b_2 - a_2b_1 = 0$, and all numerators in Cramer's Rule will also be zero (an indeterminate form 0/0).



Example


Find the point of intersection of the lines $3x - 2y = 11$ and $x + 5y = -3$.


Using the Elimination Method:



  1. Equation 1: $3x - 2y = 11$

  2. Equation 2: $x + 5y = -3$

  3. Multiply Equation 2 by 3: $3(x + 5y) = 3(-3) implies 3x + 15y = -9$ (Equation 3)

  4. Subtract Equation 1 from Equation 3:
    $(3x + 15y) - (3x - 2y) = -9 - 11$
    $17y = -20 implies y = -frac{20}{17}$

  5. Substitute $y = -frac{20}{17}$ into Equation 2:
    $x + 5(-frac{20}{17}) = -3$
    $x - frac{100}{17} = -3$
    $x = -3 + frac{100}{17} = frac{-51 + 100}{17} = frac{49}{17}$


The point of intersection is $left(frac{49}{17}, -frac{20}{17}
ight)$.



Tips for JEE and Boards:



  • For CBSE Board Exams, show clear steps for substitution or elimination.

  • For JEE Main, master Cramer's Rule for speed. It's especially useful for questions involving parameters where you might need to check conditions for parallelism or coincidence.

  • Always quickly check the ratio of coefficients ($frac{a_1}{a_2}$ vs $frac{b_1}{b_2}$) to anticipate special cases (parallel or coincident lines) before diving into lengthy calculations.

  • The intersection point is crucial for many further topics like finding the area of a triangle, distance from a point to a line, or properties of families of lines.


Practicing diverse problems will enhance your speed and accuracy in finding intersection points, a core skill for coordinate geometry.

๐Ÿ“ CBSE Focus Areas

CBSE Focus Areas: Intersection of Lines



For CBSE board examinations, understanding the intersection of lines is fundamental and often tested through direct problems or as a part of broader coordinate geometry questions. The emphasis is on conceptual clarity and procedural accuracy in finding points of intersection and applying related conditions.

1. Finding the Point of Intersection of Two Lines


The most common and basic problem type in CBSE is to find the coordinates of the point where two lines intersect. This point is unique for non-parallel, non-coincident lines.



  • Method: The coordinates of the point of intersection (x, y) satisfy the equations of both lines simultaneously. Therefore, to find this point, one needs to solve the system of two linear equations in two variables (x and y).


  • Typical Equations: Lines are usually given in the general form (A_1x + B_1y + C_1 = 0) and (A_2x + B_2y + C_2 = 0).


  • Solution Techniques: Standard algebraic methods like substitution, elimination, or cross-multiplication are expected.


  • CBSE Importance: This is a foundational skill. Questions often involve finding the intersection point and then using it for further calculations, such as finding the distance from this point to another line, or the area of a triangle formed by three lines.



2. Condition for Concurrency of Three Lines


A significant topic for CBSE is the condition under which three given lines are concurrent (i.e., pass through a common point).



  • Concept: If three lines (A_1x + B_1y + C_1 = 0), (A_2x + B_2y + C_2 = 0), and (A_3x + B_3y + C_3 = 0) are concurrent, then the point of intersection of any two lines must lie on the third line.


  • Method 1 (Direct): Find the point of intersection of any two lines (e.g., L1 and L2). Substitute these coordinates into the equation of the third line (L3). If L3 is satisfied, the lines are concurrent.


  • Method 2 (Determinant Condition): For three lines to be concurrent, the determinant of their coefficients must be zero:































    Coefficient of x Coefficient of y Constant Term
    Line 1 (A_1) (B_1) (C_1)
    Line 2 (A_2) (B_2) (C_2)
    Line 3 (A_3) (B_3) (C_3)

    This implies: (egin{vmatrix} A_1 & B_1 & C_1 \ A_2 & B_2 & C_2 \ A_3 & B_3 & C_3 end{vmatrix} = 0).


  • CBSE Importance: This is a frequently asked question type, often involving a parameter (e.g., 'k' or 'm') that needs to be determined for the lines to be concurrent. Both methods are acceptable, but the determinant method is often quicker.



3. Equation of a Family of Lines Passing Through the Intersection of Two Given Lines


This concept allows us to write the equation of any line passing through the intersection of two known lines without actually finding the intersection point.



  • Formula: If two lines are given by (L_1 equiv A_1x + B_1y + C_1 = 0) and (L_2 equiv A_2x + B_2y + C_2 = 0), then the equation of any line passing through their intersection is given by (L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0), or ((A_1x + B_1y + C_1) + lambda (A_2x + B_2y + C_2) = 0), where (lambda) is a parameter.


  • Application: This is particularly useful when an additional condition is given to determine the specific line from this family (e.g., the line passes through another given point, or is parallel/perpendicular to another line, or has a specific intercept).


  • CBSE Importance: While slightly more advanced than direct intersection problems, questions based on the family of lines are common. Students should be proficient in using this form to efficiently solve problems that would otherwise involve finding the intersection point first.



Key Takeaway for CBSE: Master the algebraic methods for solving simultaneous linear equations. Understand the conditions and methods for checking concurrency of three lines. Be prepared to use the family of lines concept to derive equations of specific lines without explicit point of intersection calculations.

๐ŸŽ“ JEE Focus Areas

The concept of Intersection of Lines is fundamental in Coordinate Geometry and frequently tested in JEE Main. Mastery of this topic involves not just finding a point but understanding conditions for various intersection scenarios and utilizing advanced techniques like the family of lines.



Finding the Point of Intersection


Given two non-parallel, non-coincident lines, their intersection is a unique point. This point satisfies the equations of both lines simultaneously.



  • Method: Solve the system of two linear equations:

    • (L_1: a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0)

    • (L_2: a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0)


    Common methods include substitution, elimination, or cross-multiplication.


    JEE Tip: For speed, especially with coefficients, the determinant method (Cramer's Rule) or cross-multiplication can be efficient for finding ((x, y)).



Conditions for Intersection of Two Lines


It's crucial to understand when and how lines intersect:































Condition Relationship Number of Intersections Determinant Condition
(frac{a_1}{a_2}
eq frac{b_1}{b_2})
Intersecting (Unique Point) One (a_1b_2 - a_2b_1
eq 0)
(frac{a_1}{a_2} = frac{b_1}{b_2}
eq frac{c_1}{c_2})
Parallel (Non-coincident) None (a_1b_2 - a_2b_1 = 0) and (b_1c_2 - b_2c_1
eq 0)
(frac{a_1}{a_2} = frac{b_1}{b_2} = frac{c_1}{c_2}) Coincident (Identical Lines) Infinite (a_1b_2 - a_2b_1 = 0), (b_1c_2 - b_2c_1 = 0), (c_1a_2 - c_2a_1 = 0)


Family of Lines (or Lines Concurrent with Two Given Lines)


This is a high-priority JEE concept. The equation of any line passing through the intersection of two given lines (L_1: a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0) and (L_2: a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0) is given by:


[L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0]


Where (lambda) is an arbitrary constant (real number). This equation represents a "family" of lines, all of which pass through the common intersection point of (L_1) and (L_2).



  • Application: Use this concept to find the equation of a specific line from this family if an additional condition is provided (e.g., passes through another given point, is parallel/perpendicular to another line, has a specific intercept, or satisfies some geometric property). Substituting the condition into (L_1 + lambda L_2 = 0) allows you to determine the value of (lambda).

  • CBSE vs JEE: While CBSE might touch upon this, JEE extensively tests its application in complex problems, often combining it with other concepts like distances, angles, or properties of triangles.



Concurrency of Three Lines


Three lines (L_1=0, L_2=0, L_3=0) are said to be concurrent if they all intersect at a single common point.



  • Method 1: Find the point of intersection of any two lines (say (L_1) and (L_2)). Then, check if this point satisfies the equation of the third line ((L_3)). If it does, the lines are concurrent.

  • Method 2 (Determinant Condition): The three lines (a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0), (a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0), and (a_3x + b_3y + c_3 = 0) are concurrent if and only if the determinant of their coefficients is zero:

    [egin{vmatrix} a_1 & b_1 & c_1 \ a_2 & b_2 & c_2 \ a_3 & b_3 & c_3 end{vmatrix} = 0]


    JEE Tip: This determinant condition is quick and efficient for problems asking to prove concurrency or find a parameter for which lines are concurrent.



Focus on understanding the underlying geometric interpretation of these algebraic conditions. Practice a variety of problems, especially those involving the family of lines, as they are a strong indicator of conceptual understanding and problem-solving skill in JEE.

๐ŸŒ Overview
Intersection of two lines is obtained by solving their equations simultaneously. Depending on relative slopes, lines may intersect at a point (unique solution), be parallel (no solution) or coincide (infinitely many solutions). Determinant tests provide quick criteria.
๐Ÿ“š Fundamentals
โ€ข Determinant test: ฮ” = A1B2 โˆ’ A2B1.
โ€ข Unique point if ฮ” โ‰  0. If ฮ” = 0 and C1/B1 โ‰  C2/B2 (proportional A,B but not C), lines parallel distinct; if all proportional, coincident.
โ€ข Solve using substitution/elimination or Cramerโ€™s rule.
๐Ÿ”ฌ Deep Dive
Matrix viewpoint of linear systems; rank and consistency; geometric interpretation of solution sets in 2D; extension to least squares intersection (overdetermined).
๐ŸŽฏ Shortcuts
โ€œฮ” decides destinyโ€: ฮ” โ‰  0 โ†’ intersect; ฮ” = 0 โ†’ parallel/coincident.
๐Ÿ’ก Quick Tips
โ€ข Prefer elimination when coefficients are friendly.
โ€ข For vertical lines, use x = constant directly.
โ€ข Verify the point in both equations to catch algebra slips.
๐Ÿง  Intuitive Understanding
Two straight lines in a plane either meet once, never meet (parallel) or are the same line (coincident). Algebra mirrors the geometry through consistent/independent/dependent systems.
๐ŸŒ Real World Applications
Solving two linear constraints: market equilibrium (supplyโ€“demand), crossing schedules, layout intersections in design/CAD, and collision checks in 2D models.
๐Ÿ”„ Common Analogies
Think of two rails: if they have different directions, they cross; if same direction and different offsets, they never meet; if exactly overlapping, they are the same path.
๐Ÿ“‹ Prerequisites
Forms of line equations; solving simultaneous linear equations; determinant basics; slope and intercept understanding.
โš ๏ธ Common Exam Traps
โ€ข Miscomputing ฮ” due to sign/order errors.
โ€ข Declaring parallel without verifying C proportionality.
โ€ข Arithmetic mistakes when substituting back to check.
โญ Key Takeaways
โ€ข Determinant test is fastest for uniqueness.
โ€ข Reduce algebra by choosing the easiest pair of forms.
โ€ข Always check special cases: vertical/horizontal lines.
๐Ÿงฉ Problem Solving Approach
Standardize forms โ†’ compute ฮ” โ†’ if ฮ” โ‰  0, solve (Cramerโ€™s/substitution) โ†’ simplify coordinates and validate โ†’ interpret geometry (parallel/coincident if ฮ” = 0).
๐Ÿ“ CBSE Focus Areas
Finding intersection point; classifying line pairs (intersecting/parallel/coincident); basic determinant idea.
๐ŸŽ“ JEE Focus Areas
Cramerโ€™s rule; parameter-based conditions for intersection; handling degenerate/special cases efficiently; interpreting geometric constraints.

No CBSE problems available yet.

No JEE problems available yet.

No videos available yet.

No images available yet.

๐Ÿ“Important Formulas (3)

Condition for Unique Intersection in 2D
$$ frac{a_1}{a_2} eq frac{b_1}{b_2} ext{ or } (a_1 b_2 - a_2 b_1) eq 0 $$
Text: For two lines $L_1: a_1x + b_1y + c_1 = 0$ and $L_2: a_2x + b_2y + c_2 = 0$ to intersect at a unique point, the determinant of the coefficient matrix must be non-zero.
This is the fundamental condition stating that the two lines must not be parallel (i.e., their slopes must be unequal). If this condition holds, solving the system of equations yields the unique point of intersection.
Variables: To quickly check if two given straight lines in the Cartesian plane have a single point of intersection (i.e., they are neither parallel nor coincident).
Condition for Intersection of Lines in 3D (Vector Form)
$$ (vec{b}_1 imes vec{b}_2) cdot (vec{a}_2 - vec{a}_1) = 0 $$
Text: For two lines $vec{r} = vec{a}_1 + lambda vec{b}_1$ and $vec{r} = vec{a}_2 + mu vec{b}_2$ to intersect, the shortest distance between them must be zero. This requires the lines to be coplanar.
If the scalar triple product is zero, the lines are coplanar. If they are also non-parallel (i.e., $vec{b}_1 eq kvec{b}_2$), then they must intersect. If they are parallel and satisfy this condition, they are coincident. This is a critical condition for <span style='color: #c90000;'>JEE Advanced</span> problems involving skew lines.
Variables: Essential for verifying if two lines in 3D space intersect. If the result is non-zero, the lines are skew (non-intersecting and non-parallel).
Finding Intersection Point in 3D (Parametric Method)
$$ vec{a}_1 + lambda vec{b}_1 = vec{a}_2 + mu vec{b}_2 $$
Text: Equating the general points of the two lines, $vec{r}_1(lambda) = vec{r}_2(mu)$, yields three scalar equations by equating the $mathbf{i}, mathbf{j}, mathbf{k}$ components.
To find the point of intersection, solve any two of the scalar equations simultaneously to find the values of the parameters $lambda$ and $mu$. These values <strong>must satisfy the third equation</strong>. If they do, substitute $lambda$ back into $vec{r}_1$ (or $mu$ into $vec{r}_2$) to get the intersection coordinates.
Variables: Used to calculate the exact coordinates $(x, y, z)$ of the intersection point after the coplanarity condition (SD=0) has been verified.

๐Ÿ“šReferences & Further Reading (10)

Book
Vectors and 3D Geometry for JEE Advanced
By: A. Das Gupta
N/A
An advanced text focusing on the 3D interpretation of line intersections, using vector and Cartesian forms, including the condition for coplanarity and shortest distance between skew lines.
Note: Critical resource specifically targeting complex 3D problems frequently encountered in JEE Advanced.
Book
By:
Website
Geometric View of Solutions to Ax = b (Line Intersections via Linear Algebra)
By: MIT OpenCourseWare (18.06 Linear Algebra)
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/18-06-linear-algebra-spring-2010/
Explores the intersection of lines (and planes) as a system of linear equations, providing a deeper mathematical context using matrix theory relevant for advanced conceptual understanding.
Note: Valuable for JEE Advanced aspirants seeking a deeper understanding of the linear algebraic interpretation of geometric problems.
Website
By:
PDF
Aakash Institute: 3D Geometry Module - Skew Lines and Coplanarity
By: Aakash Educational Services Ltd.
N/A (Proprietary Material)
Coaching institute study material focusing on advanced problem-solving techniques, parametric substitution methods, and specific numerical examples for checking line intersection in 3D space.
Note: Highly practical resource for exam-oriented solving of complex JEE problems.
PDF
By:
Article
Teaching the Geometry of Linear Equations: Connecting Algebra and Visualization
By: M. J. Kendall
N/A (Pedagogical Resource)
Discusses pedagogical approaches to visualizing 2D and 3D intersection problems, helping students interpret the algebraic results (no solution, unique solution, infinite solutions) geometrically.
Note: Helpful for teachers and highly self-motivated students to build robust conceptual visualization.
Article
By:
Research_Paper
Trajectory Planning using Intersection Detection for Collision Avoidance in Robotics
By: L. R. Schmidt and G. H. Lee
N/A (IEEE Transactions)
An applied paper using the shortest distance formula between 3D line segments (representing potential robot paths) to predict and avoid collisions.
Note: Illustrates the practical, real-world relevance of the shortest distance calculation, motivating conceptual study for JEE/Advanced.
Research_Paper
By:

โš ๏ธCommon Mistakes to Avoid (62)

Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Incomplete Parameter Consistency Check for 3D Intersection

Students often correctly parameterize the two lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ using $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$ respectively, and equate the corresponding coordinates ($x, y, z$). The mistake lies in stopping after solving for the parameters ($lambda_1, lambda_2$) using only two of the three coordinate equations. They fail to substitute these solutions into the third, un-used equation, leading to the incorrect conclusion that the lines intersect when they are actually skew.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from treating the 3D problem like a 2D simultaneous equation problem. In 2D, two equations are sufficient to find the unique point. In 3D, the third equation acts as a necessary consistency check to confirm that the intersection point truly exists in space.
โœ… Correct Approach:

To check for intersection in 3D geometry:

  1. Represent the lines $L_1$ and $L_2$ in parametric form: $mathbf{r}_1(lambda_1)$ and $mathbf{r}_2(lambda_2)$.
  2. Equate the coordinates: $x_1=x_2, y_1=y_2, z_1=z_2$. This yields a system of three linear equations in terms of $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  3. Solve two equations (e.g., $x$ and $y$ equations) simultaneously to find unique values for $lambda_1$ and $lambda_2$.
  4. Crucial Step (Check): Substitute these values into the third equation (e.g., the $z$ equation). If the third equation is satisfied, the lines intersect (Shortest Distance, SD = 0). If the third equation is not satisfied, the lines are skew (SD > 0).
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:
Line $L_1$ and $L_2$ parameters are solved from $x$ and $y$ equations, yielding $lambda_1=2$ and $lambda_2=1$. Student concludes intersection without checking the $z$ coordinates. They assume the resulting points will automatically match for $z$.
โœ… Correct:

Given lines resulting in:

EquationResult
$x$-coordinate: $lambda_1 - 2lambda_2 = 1$(Eq I)
$y$-coordinate: $2lambda_1 - lambda_2 = 1$(Eq II)
$z$-coordinate: $3lambda_1 + 2lambda_2 = 5$(Eq III)

Solving (I) & (II) gives $lambda_1 = 1/3, lambda_2 = -1/3$.

Check in (III): $3(1/3) + 2(-1/3) = 1 - 2/3 = 1/3$.

Since the RHS of (III) is 5, and $1/3
eq 5$, the system is inconsistent. The lines are skew.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
  • Mnemonic: Always use the 'Solve Two, Check One' rule for 3D intersection.
  • JEE Context: If the problem asks if the lines intersect, always use this parameter method first. The shortest distance formula is typically reserved for finding the distance when they are confirmed to be skew.
  • Verify SD=0: Mathematically, intersection means the shortest distance between the lines is zero. The inconsistency in the third equation proves SD $
    eq 0$.
CBSE_12th

No summary available yet.

No educational resource available yet.

Intersection of lines

Subject: Mathematics
Complexity: Mid
Syllabus: JEE_Main

Content Completeness: 33.3%

33.3%
๐Ÿ“š Explanations: 0
๐Ÿ“ CBSE Problems: 0
๐ŸŽฏ JEE Problems: 0
๐ŸŽฅ Videos: 0
๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ Images: 0
๐Ÿ“ Formulas: 3
๐Ÿ“š References: 10
โš ๏ธ Mistakes: 62
๐Ÿค– AI Explanation: No