Mastering probability requires not just understanding concepts but also quickly recalling formulas and definitions during exams. Mnemonics and simple shortcuts can significantly boost your efficiency and accuracy.
Here are some handy mnemonics and shortcuts for the 'Probability of an Event' topic:
CBSE vs. JEE Main Relevance: These mnemonics and shortcuts are equally beneficial for both CBSE Board Exams and JEE Main. For CBSE, they ensure accurate application of basic formulas, while for JEE Main, they provide the speed and precision needed for competitive problem-solving.
Keep these in mind, and you'll find tackling probability questions much more manageable!
Mastering the basics of probability is crucial for both JEE Main and board exams. Here are some quick, exam-focused tips to help you accurately calculate the probability of an event.
Pro Tip for JEE: While the fundamental concepts remain the same for boards and JEE, JEE questions often test your ability to apply combinatorics correctly to find `n(E)` and `n(S)` under pressure. Practice with diverse problems is key!
Understanding probability isn't just about memorizing formulas; it's about developing an intuition for how likely an event is to occur. At its core, probability is a numerical measure of uncertainty.
Imagine you're about to toss a fair coin. What are the chances it lands on 'Heads'? Most people would intuitively say "50-50" or "half a chance." Probability formalizes this intuitive idea by assigning a number between 0 and 1 to the likelihood of an event.
To grasp the probability of an event, we need to understand a few fundamental ideas:
For events with equally likely outcomes, the probability of an event E, denoted as P(E), is intuitively calculated as:
$$P(E) = frac{ ext{Number of Favorable Outcomes}}{ ext{Total Number of Possible Outcomes}}$$
Here, "Favorable Outcomes" are simply the outcomes that constitute your event E.
Consider rolling a fair six-sided die once.
Using the intuitive formula:
$$P( ext{getting a number > 4}) = frac{ ext{Number of outcomes in E}}{ ext{Total number of outcomes in S}} = frac{2}{6} = frac{1}{3}$$
This means there's a 1 in 3 chance, or approximately 33.33% likelihood, of rolling a number greater than 4. You can 'feel' that 2 out of 6 possibilities is a certain proportion, and that's exactly what probability quantifies.
This intuitive understanding forms the absolute bedrock for both CBSE board exams and JEE Main. While JEE questions will involve more complex scenarios and combinations of events, the fundamental concept of (Favorable Outcomes / Total Outcomes) for equally likely events remains central. A strong intuition helps in identifying the sample space and favorable outcomes correctly, even in intricate problems.
Keep practicing to build your "probability sense" — it's invaluable!
Probability isn't just a theoretical concept; it's a fundamental tool used across countless real-world scenarios to make informed decisions, assess risks, and predict outcomes. Understanding the probability of an event allows us to quantify uncertainty, which is crucial in various fields.
In essence, from daily decisions like choosing what to wear to complex strategic planning in global industries, probability provides the framework for understanding and navigating the uncertainties of the world around us. Mastering its fundamentals, as covered in your JEE syllabus, equips you with a powerful analytical tool.
Understanding probability can sometimes feel abstract. Analogies serve as powerful tools to demystify complex concepts by relating them to everyday scenarios. For the probability of an event, these analogies help in visualizing the ratio of favorable outcomes to total possible outcomes.
This is arguably the most common and effective analogy for introducing basic probability because it directly maps to the mathematical definition.
This analogy helps visualize probability, especially when dealing with continuous spaces or areas, and reinforces the idea of a smaller desired space within a larger total space.
This analogy is highly relatable for understanding the probability of selection from a larger group.
These analogies, while simple, provide a strong foundation for grasping the core concept of probability โ the likelihood of an event occurring. Mastering this fundamental understanding is crucial for both CBSE board exams and the more complex problems encountered in JEE Main.
Keep these simple mental models in mind; they will help you dissect even challenging probability problems!
Before diving into the formal definitions and calculations of probability, ensure you are comfortable with the following concepts:
Tip: Before proceeding, ensure you can comfortably solve basic problems related to these topics. A quick review will significantly enhance your learning experience for "Probability of an Event."
Understanding the pitfalls is crucial for securing marks. Students often lose marks not due to lack of knowledge, but by falling into common traps. Be vigilant!
Trap 1: Incorrect Identification of the Sample Space (S)
Trap 2: Misinterpretation of the Event (E)
Trap 3: Assuming Equally Likely Outcomes Always
Trap 4: Incorrect Use of the Complement Rule
Trap 5: Arithmetic and Simplification Errors
Practice diligently and cross-verify your sample space and event definitions to avoid these common pitfalls!
Understanding the probability of an event is fundamental to the entire unit of Statistics and Probability. Master these core concepts for both Board exams and JEE Main.
P(E) = (Number of Favorable Outcomes for E) / (Total Number of Possible Outcomes in S)
P(E) = n(E) / n(S)
0 โค P(E) โค 1
P(E') = 1 - P(E)
While CBSE primarily focuses on the classical definition, JEE requires understanding the axiomatic definition:
P(A โช B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A โฉ B)
P(A โช B) = P(A) + P(B)
Remember: A strong grasp of Permutations and Combinations is a prerequisite for accurately determining n(S) and n(E) in complex problems, especially for JEE. Practice identifying the type of events (mutually exclusive, independent, dependent) early on!
For students preparing for the CBSE Board Examinations, the topic of "Probability of an Event" is fundamental and carries significant weight. The focus in CBSE is primarily on a clear understanding of basic definitions, formulas, and their direct application to common scenarios. Unlike JEE, which often delves into complex combinatorial probability, CBSE emphasizes a solid conceptual foundation and step-by-step problem-solving.
| Aspect | CBSE Board Exams | JEE Main |
|---|---|---|
| Problem Complexity | Direct application of formulas, simpler scenarios. | Requires deeper analytical skills, often combined with advanced P&C. |
| Combinatorics | Basic counting (listing outcomes for small sample spaces). | Extensive use of Permutations & Combinations for complex counting. |
| Step-by-Step | Emphasis on showing all steps clearly for marks. | Focus on correct final answer and efficient problem-solving. |
Mastering these foundational aspects will ensure you score well in the CBSE board exams for probability of an event!
Welcome to the "Probability of an Event" section! This is a foundational topic for all of Probability, and a strong understanding here is crucial for tackling more advanced concepts in JEE. JEE frequently tests the core principles, often integrating them with Permutations and Combinations.
JEE vs. CBSE: While CBSE also covers these fundamental concepts, JEE problems will invariably require a much deeper understanding and application of P&C for accurate counting. The complexity of constructing the sample space and identifying favorable outcomes will be significantly higher in JEE.
Focus on understanding the problem statement thoroughly and breaking it down into identifying the sample space and the specific event before attempting to count outcomes. Practice a variety of problems to build your intuition for counting.
No CBSE problems available yet.
No JEE problems available yet.
No videos available yet.
No images available yet.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).
Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).
Using Bayes' Theorem:
| Step | Calculation | Value |
|---|---|---|
| P(A) (Total Prob.) | P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2) | $(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$ |
| P(B1|A) | P(A โฉ B1) / P(A) | $0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545) |
Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.
No summary available yet.
No educational resource available yet.