๐Ÿ“–Topic Explanations

๐ŸŒ Overview
Hello students! Welcome to Probability of an event!

Life is full of uncertainties, isn't it? Every day, we encounter situations where we're not entirely sure what the outcome will be. But what if you could quantify those chances? What if you could assign a numerical value to the likelihood of something happening? That's precisely what Probability allows us to do!

Think about it: Will it rain tomorrow? Will your favorite cricket team win the match? What are the odds of picking a specific card from a deck, or rolling a particular number on a die? These are all questions that probability helps us answer. It's the fascinating branch of mathematics that equips us with the tools to measure and understand the likelihood of various outcomes in uncertain situations.

For your JEE Main and board exams, Probability is a critical and scoring topic. It's not just about memorizing formulas; it's about developing a robust logical and analytical mindset. It frequently appears in exams, often in combination with concepts like Permutations and Combinations, making it a powerful tool in your problem-solving arsenal. Mastering this topic will significantly boost your confidence and performance.

Beyond academics, the applications of probability are virtually limitless! From making informed decisions in finance and economics, designing effective medical trials, and predicting weather patterns, to optimizing engineering processes and even understanding the complexities of genetic inheritance โ€“ probability is a fundamental concept across almost every scientific and professional field. It empowers us to make better decisions in the face of uncertainty.

In this section, we'll embark on an exciting journey to demystify uncertainty. We'll start with the foundational concepts: understanding what an 'experiment' and an 'event' are, defining the 'sample space,' and learning how to assign a numerical value to the chance of an event occurring. You'll learn about basic definitions, different types of events like mutually exclusive and independent events, and the fundamental rules that govern probability calculations.

Get ready to transform your understanding of chance into a powerful mathematical skill. This foundational knowledge will be your stepping stone to mastering more complex scenarios and unlocking the secrets hidden within uncertain data. Let's dive in and quantify the possibilities!
๐Ÿ“š Fundamentals
Hello, aspiring mathematicians! Welcome to the fascinating world of Probability! This is where we learn to quantify uncertainty, to put a number on how likely something is to happen. Isn't that cool? From predicting weather to winning a lottery, probability is everywhere. Let's dive in and build a rock-solid foundation for this super important topic.

### What is Probability? The Idea of Likelihood

Imagine you're about to toss a coin. What's the chance it will land on 'Heads'? Or what if you roll a standard six-sided die? What's the likelihood of getting a '3'? This "chance" or "likelihood" is what probability helps us measure.

In simple terms, Probability is a measure of the likelihood that an event will occur. It's a numerical value between 0 and 1, where 0 means the event is impossible, and 1 means the event is certain to happen.

Think about it like this:
* If your mom says, "There's a 0% chance you're going out tonight!" โ€“ she means it's impossible.
* If your teacher says, "There's a 100% chance you'll get good marks if you study diligently!" โ€“ she means it's certain.

Probability simply converts these percentages into decimals: 0% becomes 0, and 100% becomes 1. So, a 50% chance is a probability of 0.5. Simple, right?

### The Language of Probability: Key Terms You MUST Know

Before we start calculating probabilities, we need to understand some basic terminology. These are the building blocks!

1. Experiment: An action or process that results in an observable outcome.
* Examples: Tossing a coin, rolling a die, drawing a card from a deck, choosing a student from a class.

2. Outcome: A single result of an experiment.
* Examples:
* For tossing a coin: Getting a 'Head' or getting a 'Tail'.
* For rolling a die: Getting a '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', or '6'.

3. Sample Space (S): The set of all possible outcomes of an experiment. We usually denote it with 'S' and list the outcomes within curly braces {}.
* Examples:
* For tossing a coin: S = {Head, Tail} or S = {H, T}.
* For rolling a die: S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}.
* For tossing two coins: S = {HH, HT, TH, TT}.

4. Event (E): A subset of the sample space. It's a collection of one or more outcomes that we are interested in.
* Examples:
* From tossing a coin, an event could be "getting a Head". Here, E = {H}.
* From rolling a die, an event could be "getting an even number". Here, E = {2, 4, 6}.
* Another event from rolling a die could be "getting a number greater than 4". Here, E = {5, 6}.

### The Classical Definition of Probability: Your Go-To Formula!

Most of the basic probability problems you'll encounter, especially in the initial stages for CBSE and JEE, rely on what's called the Classical Definition of Probability. This definition applies when all outcomes in the sample space are equally likely.

The formula is beautifully simple:

P(E) = (Number of outcomes favorable to Event E) / (Total number of possible outcomes in the Sample Space)

Let's break down this formula:
* P(E): This is the probability of event E happening.
* Number of favorable outcomes (n(E)): This is how many outcomes in the sample space match the description of your event.
* Total number of possible outcomes (n(S)): This is simply the total count of all unique outcomes in your sample space.

So, the formula can also be written as:
P(E) = n(E) / n(S)

The crucial condition for using this formula is that all outcomes must be equally likely. For example, a "fair" coin means Heads and Tails are equally likely. A "fair" die means each number from 1 to 6 is equally likely. If a coin is biased (e.g., always lands on Heads), this formula wouldn't directly apply.

### Properties of Probability: Rules of the Game

Here are some fundamental properties of probability that are extremely important:

1. Probability is always between 0 and 1:

0 โ‰ค P(E) โ‰ค 1
* A probability cannot be negative.
* A probability cannot be greater than 1.
* If your calculation gives you a negative number or a number greater than 1, you've made a mistake!

2. P(E) = 0 for an Impossible Event:
* An event that cannot happen has a probability of 0.
* Example: What is the probability of rolling a 7 on a standard six-sided die?
* Sample Space S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, so n(S) = 6.
* Event E = {getting a 7} = {}, so n(E) = 0.
* P(E) = 0/6 = 0. This is an impossible event.

3. P(E) = 1 for a Sure (or Certain) Event:
* An event that is certain to happen has a probability of 1.
* Example: What is the probability of rolling a number less than 7 on a standard six-sided die?
* Sample Space S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, so n(S) = 6.
* Event E = {getting a number less than 7} = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, so n(E) = 6.
* P(E) = 6/6 = 1. This is a sure event.

4. Sum of Probabilities of all Elementary Events:
* If you list all individual outcomes (elementary events) in a sample space, the sum of their probabilities will always be 1.
* Example: For a coin toss, P(H) = 1/2 and P(T) = 1/2.
* P(H) + P(T) = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1.

### Let's Work Through Some Examples!

Understanding these concepts becomes super easy with examples. Pay close attention to how we define the sample space and the event.

#### Example 1: Tossing a Fair Coin

You toss a fair coin once. What is the probability of:
a) Getting a Head?
b) Getting a Tail?

Step-by-step solution:
1. Identify the Experiment: Tossing a fair coin.
2. Determine the Sample Space (S): The possible outcomes are Head (H) and Tail (T).
So, S = {H, T}.
3. Count Total Outcomes (n(S)): There are 2 possible outcomes. So, n(S) = 2.

a) Event E1: Getting a Head.
* Favorable Outcomes (n(E1)): Only one outcome is a Head: {H}. So, n(E1) = 1.
* Calculate Probability:
P(E1) = n(E1) / n(S) = 1 / 2

b) Event E2: Getting a Tail.
* Favorable Outcomes (n(E2)): Only one outcome is a Tail: {T}. So, n(E2) = 1.
* Calculate Probability:
P(E2) = n(E2) / n(S) = 1 / 2

Notice that P(H) + P(T) = 1/2 + 1/2 = 1. This reinforces the property we discussed!

#### Example 2: Rolling a Single Fair Die

You roll a fair six-sided die once. What is the probability of:
a) Getting an even number?
b) Getting a number greater than 4?
c) Getting a prime number?

Step-by-step solution:
1. Identify the Experiment: Rolling a fair six-sided die.
2. Determine the Sample Space (S): The possible outcomes are {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}.
So, S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}.
3. Count Total Outcomes (n(S)): There are 6 possible outcomes. So, n(S) = 6.

a) Event E1: Getting an even number.
* Favorable Outcomes (n(E1)): The even numbers in S are {2, 4, 6}. So, n(E1) = 3.
* Calculate Probability:
P(E1) = n(E1) / n(S) = 3 / 6 = 1 / 2

b) Event E2: Getting a number greater than 4.
* Favorable Outcomes (n(E2)): The numbers greater than 4 in S are {5, 6}. So, n(E2) = 2.
* Calculate Probability:
P(E2) = n(E2) / n(S) = 2 / 6 = 1 / 3

c) Event E3: Getting a prime number.
* Favorable Outcomes (n(E3)): Remember, a prime number is a natural number greater than 1 that has no positive divisors other than 1 and itself. The prime numbers in S are {2, 3, 5}. So, n(E3) = 3. (Note: 1 is not a prime number).
* Calculate Probability:
P(E3) = n(E3) / n(S) = 3 / 6 = 1 / 2

#### Example 3: Drawing a Card from a Deck

A single card is drawn from a well-shuffled deck of 52 playing cards. What is the probability of:
a) Drawing a King?
b) Drawing a Red card?
c) Drawing an Ace of Spades?

Step-by-step solution:
1. Identify the Experiment: Drawing one card from a standard deck.
2. Determine the Sample Space (S): All 52 cards in the deck.
3. Count Total Outcomes (n(S)): There are 52 cards. So, n(S) = 52.

(A quick recap of a deck of cards for those who might not be familiar:
* Total cards: 52
* Suits: 4 (Hearts โ™ฅ, Diamonds โ™ฆ, Clubs โ™ฃ, Spades โ™ )
* Colors: 2 (Red: Hearts & Diamonds; Black: Clubs & Spades)
* Cards per suit: 13 (A, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, J, Q, K)
* Face cards: J, Q, K (3 per suit, so 12 in total))

a) Event E1: Drawing a King.
* Favorable Outcomes (n(E1)): There are 4 Kings in a deck (King of Hearts, Diamonds, Clubs, Spades). So, n(E1) = 4.
* Calculate Probability:
P(E1) = n(E1) / n(S) = 4 / 52 = 1 / 13

b) Event E2: Drawing a Red card.
* Favorable Outcomes (n(E2)): There are 26 red cards in a deck (13 Hearts + 13 Diamonds). So, n(E2) = 26.
* Calculate Probability:
P(E2) = n(E2) / n(S) = 26 / 52 = 1 / 2

c) Event E3: Drawing an Ace of Spades.
* Favorable Outcomes (n(E3)): There is only one Ace of Spades in a deck. So, n(E3) = 1.
* Calculate Probability:
P(E3) = n(E3) / n(S) = 1 / 52

### CBSE vs. JEE Focus: Building Blocks

For both CBSE and JEE, a solid understanding of these fundamentals is absolutely non-negotiable.
* CBSE: The questions will largely revolve around applying the classical definition to straightforward scenarios like single coin tosses, dice rolls, or card draws, often involving simple counting.
* JEE: While the basic formula remains the same, JEE problems will rapidly escalate in complexity by combining multiple events, requiring advanced counting techniques (permutations and combinations), or introducing conditional probabilities. However, if you can't correctly identify the sample space and favorable outcomes for simple cases, you'll struggle with the complex ones. So, mastering these fundamentals is your first and most crucial step for JEE!

### Conclusion

You've just taken your first big step into probability! We've covered what probability means, the essential vocabulary, the core formula for calculating probability (the classical definition), and its key properties. Remember, the trickiest part is often correctly identifying the sample space and then carefully counting the favorable outcomes. Practice these basic examples until they feel second nature, and you'll be well-prepared to tackle more complex probability problems as we move forward! Keep exploring and keep learning!
๐Ÿ”ฌ Deep Dive
Welcome, future engineers, to a deep dive into one of the most fundamental concepts in mathematics: the Probability of an Event. This topic forms the bedrock of not just statistics but also decision-making, risk assessment, and various advanced mathematical models. For IIT JEE, a strong grasp here is crucial as it lays the groundwork for conditional probability, Bayes' Theorem, and probability distributions.

Let's begin our journey by building a robust conceptual understanding.

1. Revisiting the Foundation: Experiment, Sample Space, and Event



Before we define probability, let's quickly recap some essential terms we might have discussed earlier, but now with a sharper focus on how they relate to calculating probability.



  • Experiment (or Trial): An action or process that leads to one of several possible outcomes. Think of it as anything you do whose result isn't certain beforehand.

    • Example: Tossing a coin, rolling a die, drawing a card from a deck.




  • Outcome: A single possible result of an experiment.

    • Example: Getting a 'Head' when tossing a coin, rolling a '3' on a die, drawing the 'King of Spades'.




  • Sample Space (S): The set of all possible outcomes of an experiment. It's exhaustive, meaning it includes every single outcome, and mutually exclusive, meaning no two outcomes can occur simultaneously.

    • Example: For rolling a standard six-sided die, S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}.

    • Example: For tossing two coins, S = {HH, HT, TH, TT}.




  • Event (E): A subset of the sample space. It's a collection of one or more outcomes that we are interested in.

    • Example: For rolling a die, "getting an even number" is an event, E = {2, 4, 6}.

    • Example: For tossing two coins, "getting at least one head" is an event, E = {HH, HT, TH}.





2. The Classical Definition of Probability (A Priori Probability)



When we talk about the probability of an event in basic scenarios, we often refer to the classical definition. This definition is based on the assumption that all outcomes in the sample space are equally likely to occur.

Definition:


The probability of an event E, denoted as P(E), is the ratio of the number of outcomes favorable to the event E to the total number of equally likely outcomes in the sample space S.

Mathematically, we write it as:

P(E) = (Number of favorable outcomes for E) / (Total number of possible outcomes in S)

Or, using set notation:

P(E) = n(E) / n(S)

Where:

  • n(E) is the number of elements (outcomes) in event E.

  • n(S) is the number of elements (outcomes) in the sample space S.



Conditions for Classical Probability:


This definition is applicable only when:

  1. All outcomes in the sample space are equally likely (e.g., a fair coin, an unbiased die).

  2. The number of outcomes in the sample space is finite.



Properties of Probability:


From this definition, some fundamental properties emerge:

  • The probability of any event E always lies between 0 and 1, inclusive: 0 โ‰ค P(E) โ‰ค 1.

    • P(E) = 0 means the event is impossible (e.g., rolling a 7 on a standard die).

    • P(E) = 1 means the event is certain to happen (e.g., rolling a number less than 7 on a standard die).



  • The probability of the sample space (the certain event) is 1: P(S) = 1.

  • The probability of the empty set (the impossible event) is 0: P(ฮฆ) = 0.




JEE Focus: While the classical definition is intuitive, for JEE, you often need to combine it with advanced counting techniques (permutations and combinations) to correctly determine n(E) and n(S). Ensure you're proficient in counting principles!


Example 1: Rolling a Die
An unbiased six-sided die is rolled.

  1. What is the probability of getting an even number?

  2. What is the probability of getting a number greater than 4?


Solution:
The sample space S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}. So, n(S) = 6.

1. Let Eโ‚ be the event of getting an even number.
Eโ‚ = {2, 4, 6}. So, n(Eโ‚) = 3.
P(Eโ‚) = n(Eโ‚) / n(S) = 3 / 6 = 1/2.

2. Let Eโ‚‚ be the event of getting a number greater than 4.
Eโ‚‚ = {5, 6}. So, n(Eโ‚‚) = 2.
P(Eโ‚‚) = n(Eโ‚‚) / n(S) = 2 / 6 = 1/3.

3. Complement of an Event



The complement of an event E, denoted as E' or Eแถœ, is the event that E does not occur. It includes all outcomes in the sample space S that are not in E.

Since E and E' together make up the entire sample space S (i.e., E โˆช E' = S) and they are mutually exclusive (E โˆฉ E' = ฮฆ), their probabilities sum to 1.

Formula:


P(E') = 1 - P(E)

This formula is incredibly useful when it's easier to calculate the probability of an event *not* happening than of it happening directly.

Derivation:
We know that E โˆช E' = S and E โˆฉ E' = ฮฆ.
From the addition theorem (which we will cover next, but for mutually exclusive events, it's P(A โˆช B) = P(A) + P(B)), we have:
P(E โˆช E') = P(E) + P(E')
Since E โˆช E' = S, P(E โˆช E') = P(S) = 1.
Therefore, 1 = P(E) + P(E'), which implies P(E') = 1 - P(E).

Example 2: At Least One Head
Three fair coins are tossed. What is the probability of getting at least one head?

Solution:
The sample space S for tossing three coins is:
S = {HHH, HHT, HTH, THH, HTT, THT, TTH, TTT}
So, n(S) = 2ยณ = 8.

Let E be the event of getting at least one head.
Calculating n(E) directly would involve counting {HHH, HHT, HTH, THH, HTT, THT, TTH}, which is 7 outcomes.
P(E) = 7/8.

Alternatively, using the complement:
Let E' be the event of NOT getting at least one head, which means getting NO heads at all.
E' = {TTT} (all tails). So, n(E') = 1.
P(E') = n(E') / n(S) = 1 / 8.
Now, using the complement formula:
P(E) = 1 - P(E') = 1 - (1/8) = 7/8.
This method is often simpler, especially for "at least one" scenarios.

4. Mutually Exclusive (Disjoint) Events



Two events A and B are said to be mutually exclusive if they cannot occur at the same time. In other words, their intersection is an empty set (ฮฆ).

Definition:


Events A and B are mutually exclusive if A โˆฉ B = ฮฆ.
This means that P(A โˆฉ B) = 0.

Example: When rolling a die, "getting an even number" (E = {2, 4, 6}) and "getting an odd number" (O = {1, 3, 5}) are mutually exclusive events because a number cannot be both even and odd simultaneously. E โˆฉ O = ฮฆ.

5. Exhaustive Events



A set of events Eโ‚, Eโ‚‚, ..., Eโ‚™ is said to be exhaustive if their union forms the entire sample space S. This means that at least one of these events must occur in any trial of the experiment.

Definition:


Events Eโ‚, Eโ‚‚, ..., Eโ‚™ are exhaustive if Eโ‚ โˆช Eโ‚‚ โˆช ... โˆช Eโ‚™ = S.

Example: When rolling a die, "getting an even number" (E = {2, 4, 6}) and "getting an odd number" (O = {1, 3, 5}) are exhaustive events because E โˆช O = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} = S.

6. Mutually Exclusive and Exhaustive Events



If a set of events Eโ‚, Eโ‚‚, ..., Eโ‚™ are both mutually exclusive and exhaustive, then they form a partition of the sample space. This means that exactly one of these events must occur in any given trial.

Property:


If Eโ‚, Eโ‚‚, ..., Eโ‚™ are mutually exclusive and exhaustive, then:
P(Eโ‚) + P(Eโ‚‚) + ... + P(Eโ‚™) = P(S) = 1

Example: In a medical test, a patient can either be 'positive' or 'negative'. These two outcomes are mutually exclusive (cannot be both) and exhaustive (must be one or the other). So, P(Positive) + P(Negative) = 1.

7. Addition Theorem of Probability



This is a very important theorem that helps calculate the probability of the union of two or more events.

For Two Events A and B:


The probability that at least one of two events A or B occurs is given by:

P(A โˆช B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A โˆฉ B)

Where:

  • P(A โˆช B) is the probability that event A occurs OR event B occurs (or both).

  • P(A) is the probability of event A.

  • P(B) is the probability of event B.

  • P(A โˆฉ B) is the probability that both event A AND event B occur simultaneously.



Derivation using Set Theory:


Recall the formula for the number of elements in the union of two sets:
n(A โˆช B) = n(A) + n(B) - n(A โˆฉ B)

Now, divide the entire equation by n(S), the total number of outcomes in the sample space:
n(A โˆช B) / n(S) = n(A) / n(S) + n(B) / n(S) - n(A โˆฉ B) / n(S)

By the classical definition of probability (P(E) = n(E) / n(S)), this translates directly to:
P(A โˆช B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A โˆฉ B)

The term P(A โˆฉ B) is subtracted because outcomes common to both A and B are counted twice: once in P(A) and once in P(B). Subtracting P(A โˆฉ B) corrects this double-counting.


Special Case: If A and B are mutually exclusive events, then A โˆฉ B = ฮฆ, so P(A โˆฉ B) = 0.
In this case, the addition theorem simplifies to:
P(A โˆช B) = P(A) + P(B)
This makes perfect sense: if they can't happen together, you just add their individual probabilities.


Example 3: Drawing a Card
A card is drawn from a well-shuffled deck of 52 playing cards. What is the probability that it is a King or a Red card?

Solution:
Total number of cards, n(S) = 52.

Let K be the event of drawing a King.
There are 4 Kings in a deck (King of Spades, Clubs, Hearts, Diamonds).
n(K) = 4. So, P(K) = 4/52 = 1/13.

Let R be the event of drawing a Red card.
There are 26 Red cards in a deck (13 Hearts, 13 Diamonds).
n(R) = 26. So, P(R) = 26/52 = 1/2.

Now, we need to find the probability of drawing a card that is both a King AND a Red card (K โˆฉ R).
The Kings that are red are the King of Hearts and the King of Diamonds.
n(K โˆฉ R) = 2. So, P(K โˆฉ R) = 2/52 = 1/26.

Using the Addition Theorem:
P(K โˆช R) = P(K) + P(R) - P(K โˆฉ R)
P(K โˆช R) = (4/52) + (26/52) - (2/52)
P(K โˆช R) = (4 + 26 - 2) / 52
P(K โˆช R) = 28 / 52 = 7/13.

For Three Events A, B, and C:


The addition theorem can be extended for three events:

P(A โˆช B โˆช C) = P(A) + P(B) + P(C) - P(A โˆฉ B) - P(B โˆฉ C) - P(C โˆฉ A) + P(A โˆฉ B โˆฉ C)

This formula is based on the Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion. Each term is either adding probabilities (for individual events) or subtracting for double-counted intersections, and then adding back the triple intersection because it was subtracted thrice and needs to be included once.


Common Pitfall for JEE: Students often forget to subtract the intersection terms, especially for three events, leading to incorrect probabilities greater than 1. Always visualize with Venn diagrams to avoid double-counting.


Example 4: Student Exam Performance
In a class, 30% of students passed in Math (M), 20% passed in Physics (P), and 15% passed in Chemistry (C). It is known that 10% passed in Math and Physics, 5% passed in Physics and Chemistry, 7% passed in Math and Chemistry, and 3% passed in all three subjects. What is the probability that a randomly selected student passed in at least one of the three subjects?

Solution:
Given probabilities:
P(M) = 0.30
P(P) = 0.20
P(C) = 0.15

P(M โˆฉ P) = 0.10
P(P โˆฉ C) = 0.05
P(M โˆฉ C) = 0.07

P(M โˆฉ P โˆฉ C) = 0.03

We need to find P(M โˆช P โˆช C). Using the Addition Theorem for three events:
P(M โˆช P โˆช C) = P(M) + P(P) + P(C) - P(M โˆฉ P) - P(P โˆฉ C) - P(M โˆฉ C) + P(M โˆฉ P โˆฉ C)
P(M โˆช P โˆช C) = 0.30 + 0.20 + 0.15 - 0.10 - 0.05 - 0.07 + 0.03
P(M โˆช P โˆช C) = 0.65 - 0.22 + 0.03
P(M โˆช P โˆช C) = 0.43 + 0.03
P(M โˆช P โˆช C) = 0.46

So, the probability that a randomly selected student passed in at least one of the three subjects is 0.46 or 46%.

Conclusion


Understanding the probability of an event is foundational. By mastering the classical definition, the concept of complements, and the powerful addition theorem (for both two and three events), you equip yourself with the tools to solve a wide range of problems, from simple coin tosses to complex scenarios involving multiple overlapping events. Remember, practice is key, especially for JEE, where problems often combine these concepts with intricate counting techniques. Keep practicing, and you'll find probability to be a very scoring topic!
๐ŸŽฏ Shortcuts

Mastering probability requires not just understanding concepts but also quickly recalling formulas and definitions during exams. Mnemonics and simple shortcuts can significantly boost your efficiency and accuracy.



Mnemonics for Probability Fundamentals



Here are some handy mnemonics and shortcuts for the 'Probability of an Event' topic:




  • Definition of Probability: P(E) = (Number of Favorable Outcomes) / (Total Number of Possible Outcomes)

    • Mnemonic: F-A-T-T

      • Favorable Above, Total Throughout.

      • Think of the fraction bar separating Favorable (numerator) from Total (denominator).





  • Range of Probability: 0 ≤ P(E) ≤ 1

    • Mnemonic: "Zero to One is Done!"

      • Probability values always lie between 0 (inclusive) and 1 (inclusive). If your calculated probability is outside this range, you've made a mistake.





  • Impossible and Sure Events

    • Impossible Event (P(E) = 0):

      • Mnemonic: "Im-ZERO-sible"

      • Think of 'zero' in 'impossible'.



    • Sure/Certain Event (P(E) = 1):

      • Mnemonic: "Sure is ONE-hundred percent"

      • One (1) represents 100% certainty.





  • Complementary Events: P(E') = 1 - P(E) or P(E) + P(E') = 1

    • Mnemonic: "Opposite's One Minus"

      • The probability of an event *not* happening (E') is 1 minus the probability of it happening (E).





  • Mutually Exclusive Events (Addition Rule): P(A ∪ B) = P(A) + P(B)

    • Mnemonic: "No Overlap, Just Add Up!"

      • If two events cannot occur at the same time (no common outcomes), you simply add their individual probabilities to find the probability of either one occurring.





  • General Addition Theorem (for any two events A and B): P(A ∪ B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A ∩ B)

    • Mnemonic: "Add, then Subtract the Both"

      • When calculating the probability of A or B (or both), you add their individual probabilities and then subtract the probability of both happening (A and B) to avoid double-counting the overlap.

      • Think of A U B = A + B - (A & B).







Quick Recall Tips & Shortcuts




  • "OR" means Add (usually): In probability problems, if the question asks for the probability of Event A OR Event B, it generally implies using the addition theorem (P(A U B)). Remember to check for mutual exclusiveness or overlap.

  • "AND" means Multiply (for independent events): If the question asks for the probability of Event A AND Event B happening, especially in sequential or independent trials, it often involves multiplying probabilities (P(A ∩ B) = P(A) * P(B) if independent).

  • Visualize with Venn Diagrams: For problems involving two or three events, quickly sketching a Venn diagram can clarify the relationships between events (intersections, unions, complements) and help you apply the correct formula. This is particularly useful for JEE Main problems where complex wording can obscure simple applications.

  • Total Probability Check: When dealing with a set of mutually exclusive and exhaustive events (events that cover all possibilities without overlap), their probabilities must sum to 1. This is a quick self-check.



CBSE vs. JEE Main Relevance: These mnemonics and shortcuts are equally beneficial for both CBSE Board Exams and JEE Main. For CBSE, they ensure accurate application of basic formulas, while for JEE Main, they provide the speed and precision needed for competitive problem-solving.



Keep these in mind, and you'll find tackling probability questions much more manageable!

๐Ÿ’ก Quick Tips

๐Ÿš€ Quick Tips: Probability of an Event


Mastering the basics of probability is crucial for both JEE Main and board exams. Here are some quick, exam-focused tips to help you accurately calculate the probability of an event.





  • Understand the Fundamental Formula: The probability of an event E, denoted as P(E), is given by:


    P(E) = (Number of favorable outcomes for E) / (Total number of possible outcomes) = n(E) / n(S)


    Ensure that all outcomes in the sample space (S) are equally likely. If they are not, this formula cannot be directly applied, and you'll need to adjust your sample space or use axiomatic probability.


  • Identify Sample Space (S) Correctly:

    • The sample space is the set of all possible outcomes of a random experiment.

    • Carefully list or count all unique and equally likely outcomes. For complex scenarios, combinatorics (permutations and combinations) are often used to find `n(S)`.

    • JEE Tip: Errors in counting `n(S)` are a common source of mistakes. Practice problems involving various types of sample spaces (coins, dice, cards, balls in bags, arrangements).




  • Identify Event Space (E) Accurately:

    • The event space is a subset of the sample space, containing only the outcomes favorable to the specific event you're interested in.

    • Similar to `n(S)`, `n(E)` often requires careful application of combinatorics. Read the event description very carefully.

    • CBSE & JEE Tip: Pay close attention to keywords like "at least", "at most", "exactly", "not more than", "odd", "even", etc., as they define the boundaries of your event E.




  • Properties of Probability:

    • The probability of any event E always lies between 0 and 1, inclusive: 0 โ‰ค P(E) โ‰ค 1.

    • The probability of an impossible event (null set, denoted by ∅) is 0.

    • The probability of a sure event (the entire sample space S) is 1, i.e., P(S) = 1.




  • Use the Complement Rule Strategically:

    • If E is an event, then E' (or Ec) is its complement, representing the event "not E".

    • The complement rule states: P(E') = 1 - P(E).

    • This is a powerful shortcut! Often, calculating P(E') (e.g., "none of them", "at most zero") is much easier than calculating P(E) directly (e.g., "at least one"). Always check if the complement approach simplifies the problem.




  • Avoid Double Counting: When listing or counting outcomes, ensure each outcome is counted only once. This is particularly relevant when dealing with complex scenarios or set operations (though the latter is more for 'Operations on Events').




Pro Tip for JEE: While the fundamental concepts remain the same for boards and JEE, JEE questions often test your ability to apply combinatorics correctly to find `n(E)` and `n(S)` under pressure. Practice with diverse problems is key!


๐Ÿง  Intuitive Understanding

Understanding probability isn't just about memorizing formulas; it's about developing an intuition for how likely an event is to occur. At its core, probability is a numerical measure of uncertainty.



What is Probability?


Imagine you're about to toss a fair coin. What are the chances it lands on 'Heads'? Most people would intuitively say "50-50" or "half a chance." Probability formalizes this intuitive idea by assigning a number between 0 and 1 to the likelihood of an event.



  • A probability of 0 means the event is impossible.

  • A probability of 1 means the event is certain to happen.

  • A probability of 0.5 (or 1/2) means the event has an equal chance of happening or not happening.



Key Intuitive Concepts:


To grasp the probability of an event, we need to understand a few fundamental ideas:



  • Experiment: Any action or process that results in well-defined outcomes.

    • Intuition: Something you do where the result isn't always the same (e.g., rolling a die, spinning a wheel).



  • Outcome: A single possible result of an experiment.

    • Intuition: What actually happens when you perform the experiment (e.g., rolling a '3', getting 'Heads').



  • Sample Space (S): The set of all possible outcomes of an experiment.

    • Intuition: A complete list of everything that could possibly happen (e.g., for rolling a die, S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}).



  • Event (E): A specific outcome or a collection of outcomes from the sample space that we are interested in.

    • Intuition: What you're hoping for or focusing on (e.g., "getting an even number" when rolling a die, E = {2, 4, 6}).



  • Equally Likely Outcomes: Outcomes that have the same chance of occurring.

    • Intuition: When everything is "fair" or "unbiased" (e.g., a fair coin, a standard die). This is a crucial assumption for basic probability calculations.





The Intuitive Formula:


For events with equally likely outcomes, the probability of an event E, denoted as P(E), is intuitively calculated as:


$$P(E) = frac{ ext{Number of Favorable Outcomes}}{ ext{Total Number of Possible Outcomes}}$$


Here, "Favorable Outcomes" are simply the outcomes that constitute your event E.



Example for Intuitive Understanding:


Consider rolling a fair six-sided die once.



  • Experiment: Rolling a die.

  • Sample Space (S): {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6} — Total possible outcomes = 6.

  • Event (E): Getting a number greater than 4.

  • Favorable Outcomes (for event E): {5, 6} — Number of favorable outcomes = 2.


Using the intuitive formula:


$$P( ext{getting a number > 4}) = frac{ ext{Number of outcomes in E}}{ ext{Total number of outcomes in S}} = frac{2}{6} = frac{1}{3}$$


This means there's a 1 in 3 chance, or approximately 33.33% likelihood, of rolling a number greater than 4. You can 'feel' that 2 out of 6 possibilities is a certain proportion, and that's exactly what probability quantifies.



JEE and CBSE Callout:


This intuitive understanding forms the absolute bedrock for both CBSE board exams and JEE Main. While JEE questions will involve more complex scenarios and combinations of events, the fundamental concept of (Favorable Outcomes / Total Outcomes) for equally likely events remains central. A strong intuition helps in identifying the sample space and favorable outcomes correctly, even in intricate problems.


Keep practicing to build your "probability sense" — it's invaluable!

๐ŸŒ Real World Applications

Real World Applications of Probability of an Event


Probability isn't just a theoretical concept; it's a fundamental tool used across countless real-world scenarios to make informed decisions, assess risks, and predict outcomes. Understanding the probability of an event allows us to quantify uncertainty, which is crucial in various fields.



1. Weather Forecasting




  • Application: Meteorologists use complex statistical models and historical data to predict weather patterns. When a forecast states there's a 70% chance of rain tomorrow, it means that under similar atmospheric conditions in the past, rain occurred 70% of the time.


  • Impact: This information helps individuals plan their day (e.g., carrying an umbrella) and industries like agriculture, aviation, and construction make critical operational decisions.



2. Insurance Sector




  • Application: Insurance companies operate entirely on the principles of probability. They calculate the probability of events like car accidents, house fires, illnesses, or deaths for different demographic groups.


  • Impact: Based on these probabilities, actuaries determine policy premiums. For instance, a young, inexperienced driver might pay higher car insurance premiums because statistical data shows a higher probability of them being involved in an accident compared to an older, experienced driver.



3. Medical Diagnosis and Public Health




  • Application: Medical professionals use probability to assess the likelihood of a patient having a specific disease given their symptoms, test results, and medical history. For example, a doctor might say there's a high probability of a certain condition if a test comes back positive, but they also consider the false positive rate (the probability of the test being positive when the disease is absent).


  • Impact: In public health, probability helps epidemiologists predict the spread of infectious diseases, assess vaccine efficacy, and allocate resources effectively during health crises.



4. Finance and Investment




  • Application: Investors and financial analysts use probability to quantify risk and make investment decisions. They might calculate the probability of a stock price increasing or decreasing, or the probability of a company defaulting on its debt.


  • Impact: This helps in portfolio diversification, option pricing, and overall risk management. For example, a fund manager might assess the probability of different economic scenarios (recession, growth) and their impact on various asset classes to optimize returns.



5. Quality Control in Manufacturing




  • Application: Manufacturers use probability to maintain quality standards. They might randomly sample products from a production line and, based on the probability of finding defects, decide whether to accept or reject an entire batch.


  • Impact: This ensures that products meet specified standards, minimizes waste, and reduces the chances of defective items reaching consumers.



In essence, from daily decisions like choosing what to wear to complex strategic planning in global industries, probability provides the framework for understanding and navigating the uncertainties of the world around us. Mastering its fundamentals, as covered in your JEE syllabus, equips you with a powerful analytical tool.

๐Ÿ”„ Common Analogies

Understanding probability can sometimes feel abstract. Analogies serve as powerful tools to demystify complex concepts by relating them to everyday scenarios. For the probability of an event, these analogies help in visualizing the ratio of favorable outcomes to total possible outcomes.



1. Marbles in a Bag (The Classic Model)


This is arguably the most common and effective analogy for introducing basic probability because it directly maps to the mathematical definition.



  • Scenario: Imagine a bag containing different colored marbles โ€“ say, 3 red, 2 blue, and 5 green marbles.

  • Total Outcomes: The total number of marbles in the bag (3 + 2 + 5 = 10 marbles). This represents all possible outcomes if you were to pick one marble randomly.

  • Favorable Outcomes: If you want to find the probability of picking a blue marble, the favorable outcomes are the 2 blue marbles.

  • Probability: The probability of picking a blue marble is (Number of Blue Marbles) / (Total Number of Marbles) = 2/10 = 1/5.

  • Key takeaway: This analogy vividly illustrates that probability is a fraction representing the 'part' (favorable) out of the 'whole' (total).



2. Dartboard/Target Practice (Geometric Probability Intuition)


This analogy helps visualize probability, especially when dealing with continuous spaces or areas, and reinforces the idea of a smaller desired space within a larger total space.



  • Scenario: Consider throwing a dart at a large circular dartboard. Within this dartboard, there's a smaller, specific region (e.g., the bullseye or a red zone) that gives you bonus points.

  • Total Outcomes: The entire area of the dartboard represents all possible places your dart could land.

  • Favorable Outcomes: The area of the specific region (e.g., the bullseye) represents the outcomes you desire.

  • Probability: The probability of hitting the bullseye is approximately (Area of Bullseye) / (Total Area of Dartboard).

  • Key takeaway: This shows that probability isn't always about discrete counts but can also be about proportions of space or magnitude.



3. Lottery/Raffle Tickets (Chances of Selection)


This analogy is highly relatable for understanding the probability of selection from a larger group.



  • Scenario: You buy 5 tickets for a raffle where a total of 100 tickets have been sold. Only one ticket will be drawn as the winner.

  • Total Outcomes: The total number of tickets sold (100) represents all possible winning tickets.

  • Favorable Outcomes: The number of tickets you purchased (5) represents your chances of winning.

  • Probability: Your probability of winning the raffle is (Number of Your Tickets) / (Total Number of Tickets) = 5/100 = 1/20.

  • Key takeaway: This analogy clearly demonstrates how increasing your 'favorable outcomes' (buying more tickets) directly increases your probability of success.



These analogies, while simple, provide a strong foundation for grasping the core concept of probability โ€“ the likelihood of an event occurring. Mastering this fundamental understanding is crucial for both CBSE board exams and the more complex problems encountered in JEE Main.


Keep these simple mental models in mind; they will help you dissect even challenging probability problems!

๐Ÿ“‹ Prerequisites
To effectively grasp the concepts of "Probability of an Event" for both JEE Main and board exams, a strong foundation in a few key mathematical areas is essential. These prerequisites will enable you to correctly identify sample spaces, count outcomes, and manipulate probabilities.

Essential Prerequisites for Probability of an Event


Before diving into the formal definitions and calculations of probability, ensure you are comfortable with the following concepts:





  • 1. Basic Set Theory:

    • Concepts: Understanding of sets, elements, subsets, universal set, empty set, union ($cup$), intersection ($cap$), complement ($A'$ or $A^c$), and set difference ($A-B$).

    • Relevance: In probability, the sample space is treated as a universal set, and events are defined as subsets of this sample space. Operations like "A or B" correspond to $A cup B$, "A and B" to $A cap B$, and "not A" to $A^c$. Knowledge of Venn diagrams is also extremely helpful for visualizing events and their relationships.

    • JEE vs. CBSE: Both curricula heavily rely on set theory to define and understand probability concepts. JEE often involves more intricate scenarios requiring a robust understanding of set operations.




  • 2. Permutations and Combinations (Combinatorics):

    • Concepts: Fundamental Principle of Counting (multiplication and addition rules), permutations (arrangements of distinct or non-distinct items), and combinations (selections without regard to order).

    • Relevance: This is arguably the most crucial prerequisite for the classical definition of probability, which states $P(E) = frac{ ext{Number of favorable outcomes}}{ ext{Total number of possible outcomes}}$. To calculate these 'numbers', you will frequently need to apply permutation and combination formulas or the fundamental principle of counting. Problems involving cards, dice, balls in bags, or arrangements often require these counting techniques.

    • JEE vs. CBSE: While CBSE introduces basic counting principles, JEE questions on probability very frequently integrate complex permutation and combination problems to determine the size of the sample space and favorable events. Mastery of this unit is non-negotiable for JEE.




  • 3. Fractions and Basic Arithmetic:

    • Concepts: Operations with fractions (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division), simplification, percentages, and basic algebra.

    • Relevance: Probabilities are typically expressed as fractions or decimals between 0 and 1. You will constantly be performing arithmetic operations with these values. A solid grasp of fractions is fundamental to solving probability problems and interpreting results.

    • JEE vs. CBSE: Essential for both. It's the bedrock of numerical calculations in probability.




  • 4. Intuitive Understanding of Experiments and Outcomes:

    • Concepts: An informal understanding of what constitutes a "random experiment" (e.g., tossing a coin, rolling a die, drawing a card) and what its possible "outcomes" are.

    • Relevance: Although these terms are formally defined within the probability unit, having an intuitive sense from earlier grades or general knowledge helps in quickly relating theoretical concepts to practical scenarios.

    • JEE vs. CBSE: This is a foundational intuitive understanding that precedes formal definitions in both curricula.






Tip: Before proceeding, ensure you can comfortably solve basic problems related to these topics. A quick review will significantly enhance your learning experience for "Probability of an Event."

โš ๏ธ Common Exam Traps

Common Exam Traps in Probability of an Event


Understanding the pitfalls is crucial for securing marks. Students often lose marks not due to lack of knowledge, but by falling into common traps. Be vigilant!





  • Trap 1: Incorrect Identification of the Sample Space (S)



    • Missing Outcomes: Students frequently overlook possible outcomes, especially in multi-step experiments (e.g., tossing three coins: forgetting HTH, THH, etc., if not systematic).

    • Double Counting: In scenarios involving selections or arrangements, students might count the same outcome multiple times if order is incorrectly considered or ignored.

    • Order Matters vs. Order Doesn't: A classic trap! When rolling two dice, (1, 2) is distinct from (2, 1) if they are distinguishable dice. If they are identical, then (1, 2) and (2, 1) are often treated as the same outcome if we're only interested in the combination of numbers. However, for calculating probabilities using n(E)/n(S), the sample space usually consists of equally likely outcomes, implying distinguishable objects unless specified. Always assume objects are distinguishable unless stated otherwise (e.g., two dice are distinct, two coins are distinct).

    • JEE Tip: Complex combinatorial problems often hide this trap. Ensure your denominator n(S) is formed correctly using permutations or combinations as per the problem's demand.





  • Trap 2: Misinterpretation of the Event (E)



    • "At least one": Often miscalculated as "exactly one." The phrase "at least one" means one or more. It's usually easier to calculate its complement: P(at least one) = 1 - P(none).

    • "Not more than": Means less than or equal to. For example, "not more than 3" means 0, 1, 2, or 3.

    • "Exactly": Requires precise matching. For example, "exactly two heads" means HH, but not HHH.

    • CBSE vs. JEE: CBSE questions typically use straightforward language. JEE questions might use more convoluted phrasing, requiring careful logical interpretation.





  • Trap 3: Assuming Equally Likely Outcomes Always



    • The fundamental formula P(E) = n(E)/n(S) is valid only if all outcomes in the sample space S are equally likely.

    • Biased Objects: If a coin is biased, or a die is loaded, then the outcomes are not equally likely, and this formula cannot be directly applied. You would need to assign individual probabilities to each outcome.

    • Sums/Differences: When rolling two dice, the sums (e.g., sum=2, sum=7, sum=12) are NOT equally likely outcomes. There's only one way to get a sum of 2 (1,1), but six ways to get a sum of 7 ((1,6), (2,5), (3,4), (4,3), (5,2), (6,1)). In such cases, the sample space should be the 36 equally likely pairs of rolls, not the 11 possible sums.





  • Trap 4: Incorrect Use of the Complement Rule



    • While useful for "at least one" scenarios, students sometimes calculate P(E') but then forget to subtract it from 1 to get P(E). Remember, P(E) = 1 - P(E').

    • Conversely, sometimes direct calculation of P(E) is simpler than P(E'), especially if E' involves many more cases. Don't blindly apply the complement rule if it complicates the problem.





  • Trap 5: Arithmetic and Simplification Errors



    • Basic calculation mistakes (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division) are common, especially when dealing with large numbers from combinatorics.

    • Incorrect simplification of fractions. Always simplify your final answer to the lowest terms.

    • Forgetting that probability must always be between 0 and 1 (inclusive). If your answer is outside this range, you've made a mistake.






Practice diligently and cross-verify your sample space and event definitions to avoid these common pitfalls!


โญ Key Takeaways

๐Ÿš€ Key Takeaways: Probability of an Event



Understanding the probability of an event is fundamental to the entire unit of Statistics and Probability. Master these core concepts for both Board exams and JEE Main.



1. Definition and Basic Formula



  • The probability of an event E, denoted as P(E), is a numerical measure of the likelihood of its occurrence.

  • For a finite sample space S (where all outcomes are equally likely), the probability of an event E is given by:



    P(E) = (Number of Favorable Outcomes for E) / (Total Number of Possible Outcomes in S)


    P(E) = n(E) / n(S)





2. Range of Probability



  • The probability of any event E always lies between 0 and 1, inclusive.



    0 โ‰ค P(E) โ‰ค 1



  • A probability of 0 signifies an Impossible Event (it will never occur).

  • A probability of 1 signifies a Sure Event (or Certain Event) (it will always occur).



3. Complementary Events



  • If E is an event, then E' (or Ec or ฤ’) denotes its complementary event, meaning "not E".

  • The probability of the complementary event is:



    P(E') = 1 - P(E)



  • This formula is extremely useful when it's easier to calculate the probability of "not E" than "E" directly.



4. Axiomatic Approach to Probability (JEE Focus)


While CBSE primarily focuses on the classical definition, JEE requires understanding the axiomatic definition:



  1. For any event E, P(E) โ‰ฅ 0.

  2. P(S) = 1, where S is the sample space.

  3. If E1, E2, E3, ... are mutually exclusive (disjoint) events, then P(E1 โˆช E2 โˆช E3 โˆช ...) = P(E1) + P(E2) + P(E3) + ...



5. Union of Two Events (Addition Theorem)



  • For any two events A and B:



    P(A โˆช B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A โˆฉ B)


    Where P(A โˆฉ B) is the probability of both A and B occurring. This term prevents double-counting outcomes common to both events.

  • Special Case: Mutually Exclusive Events

    If A and B are mutually exclusive (meaning they cannot occur simultaneously, so A โˆฉ B = ร˜), then P(A โˆฉ B) = 0.

    The formula simplifies to:



    P(A โˆช B) = P(A) + P(B)





6. Practical Steps for Solving Problems



  1. Identify the Sample Space (S): List all possible outcomes of the experiment. Determine n(S).

  2. Identify the Event (E): Clearly define the event for which probability is to be found.

  3. Count Favorable Outcomes (n(E)): Determine the number of outcomes in S that satisfy event E.

  4. Apply the Formula: Calculate P(E) = n(E) / n(S).

  5. Verify: Ensure 0 โ‰ค P(E) โ‰ค 1.




Remember: A strong grasp of Permutations and Combinations is a prerequisite for accurately determining n(S) and n(E) in complex problems, especially for JEE. Practice identifying the type of events (mutually exclusive, independent, dependent) early on!


๐Ÿงฉ Problem Solving Approach

Problem Solving Approach for Probability of an Event


Understanding how to systematically approach probability problems is crucial for both CBSE board exams and JEE Main. The core idea is to correctly identify all possible outcomes and then count the specific outcomes that satisfy the given event.

Systematic Steps for Solving Probability Problems


Follow these steps to effectively solve problems related to the probability of an event:



  1. Define the Random Experiment:

    • Clearly understand the action being performed (e.g., tossing a coin, rolling a die, drawing a card). This sets the context for all possible outcomes.




  2. Determine the Sample Space (S):

    • List or conceptualize all possible distinct outcomes of the random experiment. Each outcome must be equally likely.

    • Calculate the total number of outcomes, denoted as n(S).

    • JEE Main Tip: For complex scenarios, especially involving selection or arrangement, proficiency in Permutations and Combinations (P&C) is indispensable for accurately determining n(S). Ensure you use the correct P&C formula based on whether order matters and if repetition is allowed.




  3. Identify the Event (E):

    • Clearly define the specific outcome or set of outcomes you are interested in (e.g., getting a 'head', rolling an 'even number', drawing a 'king').




  4. Calculate Favorable Outcomes (n(E)):

    • Count the number of outcomes from the sample space that satisfy the conditions of the event (E). This is n(E).

    • JEE Main Tip: Similar to n(S), calculating n(E) often requires a strong grasp of P&C. Miscounting favorable outcomes is a common mistake. Break down complex events into simpler, mutually exclusive cases if necessary.




  5. Apply the Probability Formula:

    • Use the classical definition of probability:

      P(E) = n(E) / n(S)

      where P(E) is the probability of event E.




  6. Simplify and Verify:

    • Simplify the fraction to its lowest terms.

    • Ensure that the probability value lies between 0 and 1 (inclusive). If it's outside this range, recheck your calculations.

    • Consider if using the complementary event (P(E) = 1 - P(E')) would simplify the calculation of n(E) or n(S). This is particularly useful when it's easier to count the cases where an event *does not* occur.





Key Strategies & Tips:



  • Visual Aids: For simpler experiments (like two dice rolls), drawing a table or a tree diagram can help visualize the sample space and favorable outcomes.

  • "At Least" Problems: These are often best solved using the complementary probability rule. For example, P(at least one head) = 1 - P(no heads).

  • "And" / "Or" Events: Understand when to use addition (for "or", often involves mutually exclusive events) and multiplication (for "and", often involves independent events, or conditional probability for dependent ones).



Example Problem & Solution


Problem: Two fair dice are rolled. What is the probability that the sum of the numbers appearing on the dice is 7?

Solution:


  1. Random Experiment: Rolling two fair dice.


  2. Sample Space (S): Each die has 6 faces. When two dice are rolled, the total number of outcomes is 6 * 6 = 36.

    So, n(S) = 36.


  3. Event (E): The sum of the numbers appearing on the dice is 7.


  4. Favorable Outcomes (n(E)): The pairs that sum to 7 are:
    (1, 6), (2, 5), (3, 4), (4, 3), (5, 2), (6, 1).

    So, n(E) = 6.


  5. Apply Formula:
    P(Sum is 7) = n(E) / n(S) = 6 / 36


  6. Simplify and Verify:
    P(Sum is 7) = 1/6. (This is between 0 and 1, so plausible.)



Mastering this systematic approach, coupled with strong foundational knowledge of Permutations and Combinations, will significantly improve your accuracy and speed in solving probability problems.
๐Ÿ“ CBSE Focus Areas

For students preparing for the CBSE Board Examinations, the topic of "Probability of an Event" is fundamental and carries significant weight. The focus in CBSE is primarily on a clear understanding of basic definitions, formulas, and their direct application to common scenarios. Unlike JEE, which often delves into complex combinatorial probability, CBSE emphasizes a solid conceptual foundation and step-by-step problem-solving.



Key Concepts Emphasized by CBSE:



  • Classical Definition of Probability: CBSE questions frequently test the understanding that the probability of an event E is the ratio of the number of outcomes favorable to E to the total number of possible outcomes in the sample space S, provided all outcomes are equally likely.

    • Formula: P(E) = Number of favorable outcomes (n(E)) / Total number of possible outcomes (n(S)).



  • Sample Space (S) and Events (E): Clear identification and listing of the sample space for an experiment and the outcomes constituting an event are crucial. Elementary events (single outcomes) and compound events (multiple outcomes) are important distinctions.

  • Range of Probability: Understanding that the probability of any event E always lies between 0 and 1, i.e., 0 ≤ P(E) ≤ 1.

    • Impossible Event: An event that cannot occur has a probability of 0.

    • Sure Event (or Certain Event): An event that is certain to occur has a probability of 1.



  • Complementary Events: If E is an event, then 'not E' (denoted as E' or Ec or E with a bar) is its complementary event. CBSE expects students to know and apply the relation: P(E) + P(E') = 1, or P(E') = 1 - P(E). This is a very common type of question.

  • Mutually Exclusive Events: Two events are mutually exclusive if they cannot occur simultaneously. For such events A and B, P(A and B) = 0.

    • Addition Rule for Mutually Exclusive Events: P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B).



  • Addition Rule for General Events (not necessarily mutually exclusive): For any two events A and B, P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A and B). While this formula is part of the CBSE syllabus, problems usually involve straightforward application or situations where P(A and B) is easily identifiable.



Common Problem Types in CBSE Exams:


CBSE questions typically revolve around:

  • Coin Tosses: Calculating probabilities for specific outcomes when one, two, or three coins are tossed.

  • Dice Rolls: Finding probabilities related to sums, differences, multiples, or specific numbers when one or two dice are rolled.

  • Playing Cards: Probability calculations involving drawing specific cards (e.g., face card, red king, ace) from a standard deck of 52 cards. Clear knowledge of the deck's composition is essential.

  • Drawing Objects from a Bag/Container: Problems involving drawing balls of different colors, socks, or marbles from a container without replacement (in simpler cases) or with replacement.

  • Numbers from a Set: Finding the probability of selecting a particular type of number (e.g., even, prime, multiple of 3) from a given set.



CBSE vs. JEE Main Emphasis:



























Aspect CBSE Board Exams JEE Main
Problem Complexity Direct application of formulas, simpler scenarios. Requires deeper analytical skills, often combined with advanced P&C.
Combinatorics Basic counting (listing outcomes for small sample spaces). Extensive use of Permutations & Combinations for complex counting.
Step-by-Step Emphasis on showing all steps clearly for marks. Focus on correct final answer and efficient problem-solving.


Exam Tips for CBSE:



  • Clearly Define Sample Space: Always start by explicitly listing or describing the sample space (S) and its size (n(S)).

  • Identify Favorable Outcomes: Clearly list or describe the event (E) and count the number of favorable outcomes (n(E)).

  • State Formulas: Always write down the formula before substituting values.

  • Simplify Fractions: Present your final probability answer as a simplified fraction.

  • Read Carefully: Pay close attention to keywords like "at least," "at most," "not," "and," "or," as they dictate the event definition.


Mastering these foundational aspects will ensure you score well in the CBSE board exams for probability of an event!

๐ŸŽ“ JEE Focus Areas

Welcome to the "Probability of an Event" section! This is a foundational topic for all of Probability, and a strong understanding here is crucial for tackling more advanced concepts in JEE. JEE frequently tests the core principles, often integrating them with Permutations and Combinations.



Core Concepts & JEE Focus




  • Classical Definition of Probability:

    • For a random experiment, if all outcomes are equally likely, the probability of an event E is defined as:

      P(E) = Number of favourable outcomes for E / Total number of possible outcomes

      Or, using set notation: P(E) = n(E) / n(S), where n(E) is the number of elements in event E, and n(S) is the number of elements in the sample space S.

    • JEE Emphasis: The biggest challenge in JEE problems is often correctly calculating n(E) and n(S). This almost invariably requires strong skills in Permutations and Combinations. Many probability problems are P&C problems disguised as probability questions.



  • Sample Space (S):

    • The set of all possible outcomes of a random experiment. Correctly defining the sample space is the first and most critical step.

    • Example: Tossing two coins, S = {HH, HT, TH, TT}; Rolling a die, S = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}.



  • Event (E):

    • Any subset of the sample space.

    • Example: For rolling a die, "getting an even number" is E = {2, 4, 6}.



  • Fundamental Properties of Probability:

    • 0 ≤ P(E) ≤ 1: The probability of any event must be between 0 and 1, inclusive.

    • P(S) = 1: The probability of the sure event (the entire sample space) is 1.

    • P(φ) = 0: The probability of the impossible event (empty set) is 0.

    • Complement of an Event (E'): P(E') = 1 - P(E). This rule is incredibly useful for "at least" or "not" type problems, as calculating the probability of the complementary event is often simpler.





JEE Practical Tips & Common Scenarios




  • Master Permutations & Combinations: This is non-negotiable. Be proficient in problems involving arrangements (permutations) and selections (combinations) for dice, cards (standard 52-card deck), balls in urns, forming words/numbers, etc.

  • "At Least" Problems: Often best solved using the complement rule.

    P(at least one) = 1 - P(none).

    For instance, finding the probability of "at least one head" in three coin tosses is easier by calculating 1 - P(no heads) = 1 - P(TTT).

  • Mutually Exclusive Events: If events E1 and E2 cannot occur simultaneously (i.e., E1 ∩ E2 = φ), then P(E1 ∪ E2) = P(E1) + P(E2). This is a special case of the Addition Theorem for Probability, which is critical for problems involving "OR".

  • Exhaustive Events: A set of events is exhaustive if their union forms the entire sample space (S). If E1, E2, ..., Ek are exhaustive and mutually exclusive, then P(E1) + P(E2) + ... + P(Ek) = 1.

  • Careful Counting: In many problems, students incorrectly count n(S) or n(E). Always double-check your method of counting โ€“ are the outcomes truly equally likely? Are you distinguishing identical items or treating them distinctly as required by the problem?



JEE vs. CBSE: While CBSE also covers these fundamental concepts, JEE problems will invariably require a much deeper understanding and application of P&C for accurate counting. The complexity of constructing the sample space and identifying favorable outcomes will be significantly higher in JEE.



Focus on understanding the problem statement thoroughly and breaking it down into identifying the sample space and the specific event before attempting to count outcomes. Practice a variety of problems to build your intuition for counting.

๐ŸŒ Overview
Probability quantifies uncertainty of events in a sample space. Using the axiomatic approach: 0 โ‰ค P(A) โ‰ค 1, P(S)=1, and additivity for disjoint events. For equally likely outcomes, P(A)=favourable/total.
๐Ÿ“š Fundamentals
โ€ข 0 โ‰ค P(A) โ‰ค 1; P(S)=1; P(โˆ…)=0.
โ€ข P(Aโ€ฒ)=1โˆ’P(A).
โ€ข P(AโˆชB)=P(A)+P(B)โˆ’P(AโˆฉB); if AโˆฉB=โˆ… then P(AโˆชB)=P(A)+P(B).
โ€ข Equally likely: P(A)=|A|/|S|.
๐Ÿ”ฌ Deep Dive
Kolmogorov axioms; extension to ฯƒ-algebras (conceptual only); frequency vs Bayesian interpretations (intuition).
๐ŸŽฏ Shortcuts
โ€œCIAโ€: Complement, Inclusionโ€“exclusion, Additivity (disjoint).
๐Ÿ’ก Quick Tips
โ€ข If events are mutually exclusive, never multiply.
โ€ข For at least one occurrence, use complement: 1 โˆ’ P(none).
โ€ข Check replacement vs without-replacement carefully.
๐Ÿง  Intuitive Understanding
Probability is the long-run frequency you would observe if you repeated the experiment many times under identical conditions.
๐ŸŒ Real World Applications
Risk analysis, quality control, weather forecasting, reliability engineering, and decision-making under uncertainty.
๐Ÿ”„ Common Analogies
Dartboard area analogy: probability corresponds to the fraction of area (outcomes) that count as โ€œsuccessโ€.
๐Ÿ“‹ Prerequisites
Sets, Venn diagrams, counting principles (permutations and combinations), basic algebra.
โš ๏ธ Common Exam Traps
โ€ข Treating non-disjoint events as disjoint.
โ€ข Forgetting to subtract overlaps.
โ€ข Implicit assumptions of equally likely where it doesnโ€™t hold.
โญ Key Takeaways
โ€ข Always define S and event conditions clearly.
โ€ข Use additivity for disjoint events and inclusionโ€“exclusion otherwise.
โ€ข โ€œEqually likelyโ€ is an assumptionโ€”verify it before applying |A|/|S|.
๐Ÿงฉ Problem Solving Approach
Translate the scenario into outcomes and events; verify independence/disjointness; apply axioms or counting appropriately; simplify using complements when easier.
๐Ÿ“ CBSE Focus Areas
Definition-level exercises; Venn diagram identities; simple card/dice/balls problems.
๐ŸŽ“ JEE Focus Areas
Counting pitfalls; overlapping events; at-least/at-most framing; complement and symmetry tricks.

No CBSE problems available yet.

No JEE problems available yet.

No videos available yet.

No images available yet.

๐Ÿ“Important Formulas (5)

Classical Definition of Probability (Equiprobable Spaces)
P(E) = frac{ ext{Number of favorable outcomes}}{ ext{Total number of possible outcomes}} = frac{n(E)}{n(S)}
Text: P(E) = n(E) / n(S)
This is the fundamental definition used when the sample space (S) is finite and all outcomes are equally likely (equiprobable). n(E) is the count of outcomes in the event E, and n(S) is the total count in the sample space.
Variables: Used as the baseline definition for problems involving coin tosses, card draws, or dice rolls, requiring accurate counting methods (Permutations and Combinations) to determine n(E) and n(S).
Range of Probability
0 le P(E) le 1
Text: 0 <= P(E) <= 1
The probability of any event E must lie between 0 (for an impossible event) and 1 (for a sure event), inclusive. If a calculation yields a probability outside this range, a mathematical error has occurred.
Variables: Used for verifying the validity of any calculated probability value.
Probability of Complementary Event
P(E') = 1 - P(E) quad ext{or} quad P(E) + P(E') = 1
Text: P(E complement) = 1 - P(E)
The probability that event E does not occur (denoted E' or $ar{E}$) is found by subtracting the probability of E occurring from 1. This is crucial for solving 'at least one' problems efficiently.
Variables: Use when calculating P(E) directly involves complex counting of multiple cases, but calculating the probability of the complement (E') is straightforward (e.g., P(at least one success) = 1 - P(no success)).
Addition Theorem for General Events (Union)
P(A cup B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A cap B)
Text: P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A and B)
Calculates the probability that event A occurs, or event B occurs, or both occur. The term $P(A cap B)$ (intersection) must be subtracted to correct for double-counting outcomes common to both A and B. This principle extends to three or more events (Inclusion-Exclusion Principle, often tested in JEE).
Variables: Used when calculating the probability of a union of two overlapping events (A and B are NOT mutually exclusive).
Addition Theorem for Mutually Exclusive Events
ext{If } A cap B = emptyset, ext{ then } P(A cup B) = P(A) + P(B)
Text: If A and B are mutually exclusive, P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B)
If two events A and B cannot occur simultaneously (i.e., their intersection is the null set, $P(A cap B) = 0$), then the probability of their union is simply the sum of their individual probabilities.
Variables: Used when the occurrence of one event prevents the occurrence of the other (disjoint events), such as getting a 3 or a 4 on a single die roll.

๐Ÿ“šReferences & Further Reading (10)

Book
Handbook of Mathematics (Probability Section)
By: Arihant Experts
N/A
A focused compilation of all essential formulas, theorems, and common problem types related to probability, designed for quick reference and revision.
Note: Highly practical for JEE Main and quick revision before CBSE exams. Provides concise definitions and direct application examples relevant to objective testing.
Book
By:
Website
Wolfram MathWorld: Event (Probability Theory)
By: Eric Weisstein
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Event.html
Provides precise mathematical definitions, standard notation (set theory perspective), and rigorous properties related to events in probability theory.
Note: Useful for students seeking precise mathematical rigor, especially those aiming for JEE Advanced where clear distinction between definitions (e.g., mutually exclusive vs. independent) is essential.
Website
By:
PDF
Introduction to Probability (MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes)
By: Dimitri Bertsekas & John Tsitsiklis
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/6-041sc-probabilistic-systems-analysis-and-applied-probability-fall-2010/resources/lecture-notes/
University-level lecture notes detailing the formal definition of probability, set theory review, and foundational concepts like the law of total probability and independence.
Note: Provides depth and a clear, formal structure suitable for JEE Advanced preparation. Helps in understanding the structure of complex probability problems often seen in competitive exams.
PDF
By:
Article
Tricks for Solving Complex Probability Problems in Competitive Examinations
By: JEE Preparation Staff
N/A (Exam Prep Magazine)
An article focusing on shortcuts, common patterns, and application of symmetry principles in calculating the probability of complex events (e.g., distribution of objects, random walks).
Note: Highly practical for maximizing speed and accuracy in JEE Main. Focuses on transforming word problems into solvable probability expressions quickly.
Article
By:
Research_Paper
Connecting Set Theory and Probability: A Unified Approach to Events
By: Statistical Review Board
N/A (Academic Journal)
Explores how set operations (union, intersection, complement) directly translate into probability operations (addition rule, multiplication rule) regarding events.
Note: Reinforces the crucial link between counting/set theory (often a weak point for students) and probability axioms. Excellent for JEE preparation where complex event definitions rely heavily on set notation.
Research_Paper
By:

โš ๏ธCommon Mistakes to Avoid (63)

Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th
Important Other

โŒ Assuming Equiprobability in Reduced or Derived Sample Spaces

Students frequently make the subtle, minor mistake of assuming that outcomes remain equiprobable when the sample space is reduced or defined based on prior probabilities (e.g., in problems involving conditional probability or Bayes' theorem). They apply the simple counting formula $P(E) = n(E)/n(S')$ to the reduced space $S'$ without verifying that the outcomes in $S'$ are equally likely.
๐Ÿ’ญ Why This Happens:
This minor error stems from an over-reliance on the basic definition of probability $n(E)/n(S)$ taught early on. In advanced JEE problems, the outcomes defining the restricted event (the new denominator) usually retain the probabilistic weight of the original experiment, meaning the outcomes are not equiprobable in the new context.
โœ… Correct Approach:
Always define the probability mass function (PMF) associated with the events. When dealing with restricted sample spaces (Event B occurring), use the rigorous conditional probability approach (Bayes' Theorem or definition $P(A|B) = P(A cap B) / P(B)$). Never use simple counting for derived sample spaces unless you can prove the new events are equally likely.
๐Ÿ“ Examples:
โŒ Wrong:

Scenario: Two boxes, B1 (P=0.7) and B2 (P=0.3), are selected. B1 has 9 Red (R) and 1 Blue (B). B2 has 1R and 9B. A ball is drawn and is Red (Event A).

Wrong Logic: The sample space $S'$ (Red ball drawn) contains two outcomes: R from B1 and R from B2. The student assumes $P(R|B1) = P(R|B2)$ in this restricted space and concludes $P(B1|A) = 1/2$. This ignores the prior probabilities (0.7 vs 0.3).

โœ… Correct:

Using Bayes' Theorem:

StepCalculationValue
P(A) (Total Prob.)P(A|B1)P(B1) + P(A|B2)P(B2)$(0.9)(0.7) + (0.1)(0.3) = 0.63 + 0.03 = 0.66$
P(B1|A)P(A โˆฉ B1) / P(A)$0.63 / 0.66 = 21/22$ (Approx. 0.9545)

Conclusion: The events {R from B1} and {R from B2} are clearly not equiprobable, proving the need for formal probability calculation.

๐Ÿ’ก Prevention Tips:
JEE Tip: If the problem involves selection stages (e.g., choosing a box, then a ball), assume the resulting events are NOT equiprobable unless proven otherwise.
Always identify the initial probability structure (prior probabilities) before attempting counting methods.
Use the definition of conditional probability $P(A|B)$ to handle reduced sample spaces, relying on calculated probabilities $P(A cap B)$ and $P(B)$, rather than simple ratios of counts.
CBSE_12th

No summary available yet.

No educational resource available yet.

Probability of an event

Subject: Mathematics
Complexity: Mid
Syllabus: JEE_Main

Content Completeness: 33.3%

33.3%
๐Ÿ“š Explanations: 0
๐Ÿ“ CBSE Problems: 0
๐ŸŽฏ JEE Problems: 0
๐ŸŽฅ Videos: 0
๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ Images: 0
๐Ÿ“ Formulas: 5
๐Ÿ“š References: 10
โš ๏ธ Mistakes: 63
๐Ÿค– AI Explanation: No